• Embed Doc
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
1
 
Interactions
 
2
 c  o  e  t  i    o 
 o  a  t      o 
 c  o  e  t  i    o 
 c  a  b   e  s  u  p  e  s  e  d   e  d   b   y  a  s i    t   d  i   f   f    u  s  e  s  b   e  c  o m e  s 
 a l      u  e  c h    a    g  e i      s i        g h    t     
  s   i   m   p   l  e    i   t  e   r  a   t   i  o   n
   (    t  r   i  a   l    &   e  r  r  o  r    )
  c   r  e  a   t   i   v  e   d  e  s   t   r   u  c   t   i  o   n
   (   u  n  p   l  a  n  n  e  d   c  o  n  s  e  q   u  e  n  c  e  s    )
   l  e  a   r   n   i   n  g     p   r  o  c  e  s  s
   (   r  e   f   i  n   i  n  g    g   o  a   l  s    )
  d  e  s   i  g    n    p   r  o  c  e  s  s
   (   a  r   t   i   f   i  c   i  a   l   e   v  o   l  u   t   i  o  n    )
community
111222
 a  g  e  e  s  o  & i    s  s h   a  p  e  d   b   y m a i    t   a i    s  e l    a  t  i    o  s h  i    p  t   o 
 
 d  i    s  t   u  b   s  e l    a  t  i    o  s  c  e  a  t  i    g  t  h   a  t  i    s l    a  g  e  e  o  u  g h   g  a i    s f    a m e  s  p  o  s  s i    b  i   l   i    t  i    e  s f    o m u  s  t   b   e  s h   a  e  d   t  h   o  u  g h  
   t    h   a   t    f   a    i    l   s   m   a   y    l   e   a    d   t   o   n   e   w   m   a   y   p   r   o   m   p   t   a   n   e   w   m   a   y   c   r   e   a   t   e   a   m   u    l   t    i   p    l    i   e   r   e    f    f   e   c   t    l   e   a    d    i   n   g   t   o   m   o   r   e   m   o   t    i   v   a   t   e   s   p   o   s   s   e   s   s
m u  s  t   b   e  p  o  e  d   t  h   o  u  g h  
    h   e    l   p   s    i   m   p   r   o   v   e
 e  d   u  c  e  s i    s k   , e  c  o  u  a  g i    g  e f    o m s  e l    a  t  i    o  s  c  e  a  t  i    g  a l   l    d   e l   i    e i    e i    t   a  b  l    y l    e  a  d   t   o i   f    s  t   o  g  , a i    s  e  c  a l   l    s f    o  e f   f   i    c i    e  c  y  , d   a  g  e  o  u  s l    y  e  d   u  c i    g  b   e  e f   i    t  f    o m  (   i    c  e  a  s  e  e f   f   i    c i    e  c  y  b   y  )    s h   a i    g  s k  i   l   l    s wi    t  h  i    a  a  g  e  e  s  o  & i    s  s h   a  p  e  d   b   y m a i    t   a i    s  e l    a  t  i    o  s h  i    p  t   o 
conventioncontext
(environment)
innovationcommunity commuconventioncontext
may fail to recognizeeach faces
   i   s   i    m   b   a   l   a   n   c   e   i   n   r   e   l   a   t   i   o   n   s   a    m   o   n   g
  p  o  s e l    o  n  g - t  e r   m t   h r e  a t   s t   o  a  n  y
  c  r  e  a  t  e  s  n  e    w
   i   s   b   a   l   a   n   c   e   i   n   r   e   l   a   t   i   o   n   s   a    m   o   n   g
 p  r   e  s  e  r   v   e  s   s  t   a  t   u  s   q  u  o   b   y    r   e  s  i   s  t   i   n   g  
   i   s   a    m   e   a   s   u   r   e   o    f   p   r   o   p   e   n   s   i   t   y    f   o   r
aidsrequirescomes fromdrive
pressure
 (external)
decay
 (internal)
change
(disturbance)
misfit
(pain)
recognition
(definition)
insight
(seeing opportunity)
preparation
(immersion)(a bit of luck)
articulation
(prototyping)
demonstration
(testing)
evaluates
adoption
(counter-change)
fit
(gain)
leads to newis reflected as increased
variety
(experiences)
actionsartifactsbeliefs
may lead tomay lead to
valueindividualsinnovation
a model of
 i    n  c r e  a  s e  s t   h e l   i    k  e l   i    h  o  o  d  o f 
DubberlyDesignOfficepreparedthisconceptmapasaprojectoftheInstitutefortheCreativeProcessattheAlbertaCollegeofArtandDesign.TheInstituteexiststofocusandorganizeactivities,enterprises,andinitiativesofACADwithregardtothecultivationofdialogue,research,andspecialprojectsthatdirectlyaddress thenatureofthecreativeprocessanddesignthinking.ACADisaleadingcentreforeducationandresearch,andacatalystforcreativeinquiryandculturaldevelopment.Pleasesendcommentsaboutthismodeltoicp@acad.ca
Acknowledgements
WritinganddesignbyHughDubberly,NathanFelde,andPaulPangaroAdditionaldesignbySeanDurhamandRyanReposarResearchbySatokoKakihara,ACADfacultyChrisFrey,WayneGiles,andDarleneLeeCopyright©2007DubberlyDesignOffice2501HarrisonStreet,#7SanFrancisco,CA941104156489799InstitutefortheCreativeProcessattheAlbertaCollegeofArt+Design1407-14AveNWCalgary,ABCanadaT2N4R34032847670
Sponsorship
EPCOR,afoundingpartneroftheInstitutefortheCreativeProcess,generouslyprovidedfundingforthisproject. PrintedinCanadaW.RossAshbydescribesvarietyasameasureofinformation.Varietydescribesasystem’spotentialtorespondtodisturbances—theoptionsithasavailable.Appliedtocommunities,varietydescribestheexperiences—therichnessoflanguageandrangeofculturaltools—theycanbringtobearonproblems.Inastableenvironment,increasingefficiencymakessense.Dowhatyou’vebeendoing,butdoitbetterandatalowercost.Thatmeansnarrowinglanguage—decreasingvariety.Inanunstableenvironment,pursuingefficiencymayactuallybedangerous.Youmaygetbetteratdoingthewrongthing—atdoingsomethingthatnolongermatters.Thekeyistomakesurewhatyouproduceisvaluable,beforeyouworryaboutmakingitmoreefficiently.Increasingeffectivenesscallsforincreasingvariety—changingperspective,bringingnewpeople,newexperience,andnewlanguageintotheconversationandexpandingthefieldofaction.Someorganizationshaveprocessesbywhichtheirmembersbuild(orbuy)newideasatasmallscale.Theorganizationsvet(orselectordestroy)ideas,movingafewtothenextstage.They“incubate”newideasin“hothouses”longenoughtolaunchthemintotheworld.Examplesinclude(perhapsmostnotably)RoyalDutchShell,somereligions(suchasCatholicism),venturecapitalfirms,and technologycompaniessuchasGoogle.Somecommunities(someecologies)seemtohavethevarietyandstructuresneededtoraisetheprobabilityofinnovation(withincertaindomains).Forexample,SiliconValley,Route128aroundBoston,Austin,ResearchTriangle,andSeattleallcurrentlyenjoy thisadvantage.Insightbeginsaprocessofrestoringfit.Insightremainsthemostmysteriouspartoftheinnovationprocess.Itmaybeirreducible,butitcanbeaided.Immersionwithinthecontextisalmostalwaysessential.Experiencewithotherdomainshelps(byincreasingvariety).Forexample,applyingpatternsfromotherdomainscanhelpsolvenewproblems.ThisisthepromiseofGenrichAltshuller’ssystemknownasTRIZ.Insightisatypeofhypothesis,aformofabduction.Insightmaycomefromjuxtapositionandpatternmatching.GyörgyPolyasuggestsasking:Whatistheunknown?Whatarethedata?Whatisthecondition?(Whataretheconstraints?)Whatistheconnectionbetweendataandunknown?Whatisarelatedproblem?Howcouldyourestatetheproblem?Whatcouldyoudrawtorepresenttheproblem?Noinnovationarisesfullyformed.Articulationprovidesameansofsharinganinsight.Demonstrationproves(ordisproves)theinsight’svalue.Demonstrationprovidesabasisforadoption;itisakeytocreatingchange.Demonstrationenablesevaluation.Testingdiscloseserrors,increasesunderstanding,andprovidesabasisforimprovement.Iterationisalwaysnecessary.Ofcourse,theconventionresultingfromasuccessfulinnovationdiffersfromtheconventionthatprecededit.Likewise,thecommunitythatexistsafteraninnovationislikelytohavechangedfromthecommunitythatprecededit.Thecontext,too,islikely tohavechangedbeyondthechangewhichcreatedthemisfitleadingtoaninnovation.Thescaleofchangevaries.Manypeoplehaveproposedmodels,forexample:MichaelGeoghegan:RecognizinganewdomainofinventionCreatingnewopportunitiesfordiscoverywithinthedomainImprovingtheefficiencywithwhichthediscoveriesareappliedHorstRittel:Simpleproblems,wherethegoalisdefinedComplexproblems,wherethegoalremainsunclearWickedproblems,whereconstituentscannotagreeonthegoalParrishHanna:TacticalorincrementalStrategicorpunctuatedCulturalorprocess-orientedEachinnovationisalinkbetweentwoconventions: theoneitreplacesandtheoneitbecomes.Aninnovationisapivot;ittransformsoneperiodintothenext.Everyconventionexistswithinacommunity.Aconventionestablishesarelationbetweenacommunityanditscontext.Itdefinesaway thecommunityexpectsitsmemberstobehaveinagivensituation.Itprescribesthetools theycanuse,evenwhattheycanthink.Everyinnovationhasaprecedentinapreviousconvention.Everycommunityexistswithinacontext.Contextistheenvironmentinwhichacommunitylives.Tosurvive,acommunitymusthaveastablerelationshipwithitsenvironment.Maintainingthatstablerelationshipisthepurposeofconventions.Acommunityisasystemofpeoplewhointeractwithinanagreedsetofrules—conventions.Typically,membersofacommunityshareacommonlocationorcommoninterests.Theymayberelatedbybirthormaycome togetherforsocialorbusinessreasons.Communitiesrelyonindividualstoprovidethevarietynecessaryforsurvival— toshareperspective,insight,ideas,andinspiration.Overtime,newmembersjoinandexistingmembersdepart.Thesechangescanaffecttheconventionsthecommunitykeeps.Entropyalwaysincreases.Resistingentropyrequiresenergyandvariety.Inevitably,botharelimited.Pressurefromoutsideordecayinsidechangestherelationshipbetweenacommunityanditscontext.Thatrelationship—formalizedasaconvention—isnolongercomfortable,nolongerafit.Adisturbanceupsetsanexistingconvention.Thisisarootcauseofinnovation.Adisturbancehasvarietyofitsown.Unlessacommunityhascorrespondingvarietytocancelit, thevarietyinadisturbancewilloverwhelmthecommunity.Varietycancelsvariety.Amisfitariseswhenaconventionnolongermaintainsadesiredrelationbetweenacommunityanditscontext.Misfitmanifestsitselfaspain.Itexactsacost—physical,mental,social,orfinancial—onmembersofthecommunity.
   C  o  n   v  e  n   t   i  o  n  s  e   x   i  s   t   i  n  a   w  e   b  o   f  c  u   l   t  u  r  e .   I  n  n  o   v  a   t   i  o  n   i  n  o  n  e  p   l  a  c  e  a   f   f  e  c   t  s  r  e   l  a   t  e  d  c  o  n   v  e  n   t   i  o  n  s  a  n  d   m  a   y  r  e  d  u  c  e   t   h  e   i  r   “   f   i   t ,   ”   h  a  s   t  e  n   i  n  g    f  u  r   t   h  e  r   i  n  n  o   v  a   t   i  o  n .   A  s   t   h  e  c   y  c   l  e  c  o  n   t   i  n  u  e  s ,  s  e  c  o  n  d  -  o  r   t   h   i  r  d  -  o  r  d  e  r  o  r   i  n  d   i  r  e  c   t  e   f   f  e  c   t  s  a  r  e  n  o   t   k  n  o   w  a   b   l  e   i  n  a  d   v  a  n  c  e .   R  e  s  u   l   t  s  c  a  n   b  e  s  u  r  p  r   i  s   i  n  g   a  n  d  c  o  n  s  e  q   u  e  n  c  e  s  u  n   i  n   t  e  n  d  e  d .  J  o  s  e  p   h   S  c   h  u   m  p  e   t  e  r  d  e  s  c  r   i   b  e  s  c  r  e  a   t   i   v  e  d  e  s   t  r  u  c   t   i  o  n  a  s   “   t   h  e  p  r  o  c  e  s  s  o   f   i  n  d  u  s   t  r   i  a   l   m  u   t  a   t   i  o  n   t   h  a   t   i  n  c  e  s  s  a  n   t   l   y  r  e   v  o   l  u   t   i  o  n   i   z  e  s   t   h  e  e  c  o  n  o   m   i  c  s   t  r  u  c   t  u  r  e   f  r  o   m   w   i   t   h   i  n ,   i  n  c  e  s  s  a  n   t   l   y  d  e  s   t  r  o   y   i  n  g    t   h  e  o   l  d  o  n  e ,   i  n  c  e  s  s  a  n   t   l   y  c  r  e  a   t   i  n  g   a  n  e   w  o  n  e .   ”
Recognitionofmisfitcomesfromobservationandexperience.Researchmethods—suchasethnography—help.Butidentifyingaproblemrequiresdefinition.Definitionsareconstructed—agreedto.Theyhaveconstituencies.Thus,definitionisapoliticalact,anexerciseofpower.Individualswhoarepreparedtoinnovatepossess:OptimismBelieftheycanimprovetheworldOpennesstochangeConfidencetomakeitsoTenacity,persistencetoseeitthroughPassion,desire,evenobsessionVarietyExperience,skill,andtalentDomainexpertiseKnowledgeofotherdomainsUnderstandingoftheprocessMethodsandtechniquesManagement,rhetorical,andpoliticalskillsPractice(Doingitafewtimeshelps.)Theyalsoknowwhatisnotknownbutnecessaryforprogress;theyunderstandhowtofindit;andtheyrecognizewhocanprovidethatknowledge.Forinsighttomatter,itmustbearticulated—givenform.ItmightbeaHypothesisModelordiagramOutlineScriptorstorySketchMock-upPrototypePilotInnovationisaholygrailofcontemporarysociety,andespeciallybusiness.Afloodofbooksandmagazinespromoteit.Designfirmspromiseit.Customersdemandit.Survival,we’retold,dependsonit.Butwhatisit?Andhowdowegetit?Weusedtoaskthesamequestionsaboutquality.ThenWalterShewhartandEdwardDeminganswered.Today,statisticalprocesscontrol,totalqualitymanagement(TQM),kaizen,andsix-sigmamanagementarefundamentaltoolsinbusiness.Organizationshavebecomemuchbetteratmanagingquality.Qualityhasbecomeacommodity,oratleast“tablestakes,”necessarybutnotsufficient.Now,innovationmattersmorebecauseyoucan’tcompeteonqualityalone,whetherasabusiness,acommunity,orasociety.Thenextarenaofglobalcompetitionisinnovation,butthepracticeofinnovationremainsstucksome40yearsbehindthepracticeofquality.Qualityislargelyaboutimprovingefficiency,whereasinnovationislargelyaboutimprovingeffectiveness.Improvingqualityisdecreasingdefects.It’saboutmeasuring.It’smakingprocessesmoreefficient.Itworkswithinanexistingparadigm.
BusinessWeek 
designeditorBruceNussbaumhassuggestedyoucan’tmeasureyourwaytoinnovation—measurementbeingthehallmarkofqualityprocesses.Andthoughsomesix-sigmaadvocatesdisagree,Nussbaumispointingoutafundamentaldifferencebetweenmanagingqualityandmanaginginnovation.Innovationiscreatinganewparadigm.It’snotgettingbetteratplayingthesamegame;it’schangingtherulesandchangingthegame.Innovationisnotworkingharder;it’sworkingsmarter.Thisposterproposesamodelforinnovation.Ittakestheformofaconceptmap,aseriesoftermsandlinksformingpropositions.Themodelisbuiltontheideathatinnovationisaboutchangingparadigms.Themodelsituatesinnovationbetweentwoconven- tions.Innovationtransformsoldintonew.Itisaprocess—aprocessinwhichinsightinspireschangeandcreatesvalue. Theprocessbeginswhenexternalpressureorinternaldecaydisturbstherelationbetweenacommunityanditscontext,arelationmaintainedbyaconvention.Theexistingconventionnolonger“fits.”Perhapsthecontextchanged.Orthecommunity.Oreventheconvention.Someonenoticesthemisfit.Itcausesstress.Itcreatesenoughfriction,enoughpain,tojumpintopeople’sconsciousness.Perceptionofmisfitalmostsimultaneouslygivesrisetoproposalsforchange,forreframing.Theseproposalscompeteforattention.Mostfailtoinspire,areignored,andfadeaway.Thechangesthatsurvivearebydefinitionthoseacommunityfindseffective.Theyspreadbecausetheyincreasefit(gain)andlowerpainorcost(deliveringvalue).Werarelyrecognizeinnovationwhileit’shappening.Instead,innovationisoftenalabelappliedafterthefact,whenitsvalueisclearandanewconventionhasbecomeestablished.Ethnographyandotherresearchtechniquesmayhelpidentifyopportunitiesforinnovation.Designmethodsmayincreasethespeedofgeneratingandtestingnewideas.Butnewideasarestillsubjecttonaturalselection(ornaturaldestruction)inthepoliticalprocessorthemarketplace.Innovationremainsmessy.Evendangerous.Luckandchance,beingattherightplaceattherighttime,stillplayarole.Butheightenedsensitivityandpersistentalertnessmayincreaseluck.Thismodelisnotarecipe.Atbestitsuggestswaystoincrease theprobabilityofinnovation.Ourgoalisforittospurdiscussion.Ourhopeisthatincreasedunderstandingwillspurinnovationandincreasethegreatergood.
   C  r  e  a   t   i  n  g    v  a  r   i  a   t   i  o  n   i  s   t   h  e   f   i  r  s   t   m  e  c   h  a  n   i  s   m  o   f  e   v  o   l  u   t   i  o  n  —  a  n  d  d  e  s   i  g   n .    T  e  s   t   i  n  g   a  p  r  o   t  o   t   y  p  e   m  a   y  r  a   i  s  e  q   u  e  s   t   i  o  n  s  a   b  o  u   t   t   h  e   f  r  a   m   i  n  g   o   f  a  p  r  o   b   l  e   m  o  r  d  e   f   i  n   i   t   i  o  n  o   f  g   o  a   l  s .   R  e   f  r  a   m   i  n  g   o  r  r  e   f   i  n   i  n  g   o  p  e  n  s   t   h  e  p  o  s  s   i   b   i   l   i   t   y   t  o   t  r   y   i  n  g   o   t   h  e  r  a  p  p  r  o  a  c   h  e  s .   N  a   t  u  r  a   l  d  e  s   t  r  u  c   t   i  o  n   (    i .  e . ,  d   i  s  c  a  r  d   i  n  g   p  o  o  r   l   y  p  e  r   f  o  r   m   i  n  g    v  a  r   i  a   t   i  o  n  s    )   i  s   t   h  e  s  e  c  o  n  d   m  e  c   h  a  n   i  s   m  o   f  e   v  o   l  u   t   i  o  n  —  a  n  d  d  e  s   i  g   n .
---------
 
3
Toward a model of innovation
Can we reach consensus on such a model forinnovation?One step may be to propose models for discussion.Last year, Lance Carlson, President of the AlbertaCollege of Art and Design (ACAD), initiated aproject (through ACAD’s Institute for the CreativeProcess) to create a “concept map” of innovation.The Institute worked with ACAD faculty, DubberlyDesign Office, Paul Pangaro, and Nathan Felde todevelop a series of models and published one as aposter.This article describes the published model andillustrates the process of developing it.
Concept maps
This model of innovation takes the form of aconcept map. “A concept map is a schematicdevice for representing a set of concept meaningsembedded in a framework of propositions.” (Novakand Gowan, 1984) In a concept map, nodes andlinks form a web of meaning, a semantic mesh.Nodes are nouns. Links are verbs. A noun-verb-noun sequence forms a proposition, a sentence.Concept maps are similar to entity-relationshipdiagrams and entailment meshes, though lessconstrained and less rigorous.This concept map uses text direction and arrowsto indicate reading direction. Type size indicatesimportance and hierarchy. Colored backgrounds join related terms.Creating concept maps involves trade-offs. Addingterms provides detail and may help clarify, butmore terms mean more links, increasing thereader’s effort.Concept maps differ from traditional texts bymaking links explicit, by creating multiple pathways.People often ask, “Where should I start reading?”You can start anywhere. Concept maps have no realstarting point; they are webs. Still, like any model,concept maps benefit from explanation. They canbe explained by telling a story. Conversely, telling astory paints a picture, creates a model in the mindof the listener.
Previous spread: A model of innovation, March 2007. DubberlyDesign Office prepared this concept map as a project of theInstitute for Creative Process at the Alberta College of Artand Design (ACAD). Written and designed by Hugh Dubberly,Nathan Felde, and Paul Pangaro, additional design by SeanDurham and Ryan Reposar. Research by Satoko Kakihara andACAD faculty Chris Frey, Wayne Giles, and Darlene Lee.The model is a direct product of interaction among the team;but it is also the indirect product of interactions with severalothers who shared their insights with the authors, includingRobin Bahr, Chris Conley, Peter Esmonde, Shelley Evenson,Michael Geoghegan, Kathy McCoy, Michael McCoy, FredMurrell, and Rick Robinson.
by Hugh DubberlyFor the last few years, innovation has been a bigtopic in conversation about business management.A small industry fuels the conversation with articles,books, and conferences.Designers, too, are involved. Prominent productdesign firms offer workshops and other servicespromising innovation. Leading design schoolspromote “design thinking” as a path to innovation.But despite all the conversation, there is littleconsensus on what innovation is and how to get it.The current conversation about innovation issimilar to an earlier conversation about quality. Asrecently as the late 1980s, quality was somethingbusinesses actively sought but had trouble defining.Today, statistical process control, TQM, Kaizen,and Six-Sigma management are common tools inbusinesses around the world.As businesses have become good at managingquality, quality has become a sort of commodity—“table stakes,” necessary but not sufficient toensure success. When everyone offers quality,quality no longer stands out. Businesses must lookelsewhere for differentiation. The next arena forcompetition has become innovation.The question becomes: Can innovation be “tamed”as quality was?A key step in taming quality was Walter Shewhartand Edward Deming proposing a process model.(Shewhart, 1939) Their quality cycle is now widelytaught and has become an important part of thequality canon. But innovation has no correspondingmodel.
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...