Professional Documents
Culture Documents
In 2006 two British developers came up with the idea of creating a website that would allow citizensto use the relatively recent freedom of information law in Britain in a digital way. In this way the website What do they know? from the British NGOMy Societycame into existence.The international version of this project, called Alaveteli is now being implemented in 9 countries. Beyond Alaveteli there are other similar designed software working in the United StatesofAmerica,Chileand Germany. Thelast census availablenotedupto15websitesacrosstheworld. As these portals start to spread new challenges emerge for practitioners in terms of making FOI requests, as well as to public servants in terms of answering them. Furthermore, new legal challenges emerge as old access to information laws, and different legal traditions cope with thedigital age.As we will show, some of these challenges in developing countries are a bit more complex that in the developedworld.
and usability. In terms of technology the team looked for relatively clean code, Open Source software and a community that could support a long term work. By that time Alaveteli was the only software doing the former. Furthermore, the previous existence of an Alaveteli website adapted to Spain made translating the content relatively easier. The website also included significant amount of material developedbyspecialistNGOsinUruguay. Getting the data about Uruguayan government offices was difficult. The uruguayan state is not a small one (albeit the countryis small)and emails were not easily available. We made use of anofficialagenda of authorities (in closed format) to get the first emails of uruguayan authorities. Many of them did not workastheywereeitheroutofdateorwerenotinusebytherelevantofficers. Quesabes.uy was enhanced by the work of DATA, a NGO devoted to to Open Data andtransparency. Design, technical enhancement and thelaunch strategy was discussed. We decided tocollaborate with a local NGO already working on FOI in Uruguay. The objective was to engage with people already workingon the subject, reachingout ourpotential communityofusers. Furthermoreour theory of change behind this move, was to bridge the traditional divide between techie people and traditional NGOs, as civil society was in need to present a united front to solve the crucialissue of making the site workand push uruguayan authorities to accept emails as a valid mechanism within the law. DATA then coordinated support from other NGOs working on this topic in Europe and Latin America and launched thewebsitewithsignificantlocalandinternationalpublicity.
Largely the Uruguayan state still ignoresusers. Furthermoresomeoffices answered they were not going toanswerFOI requestthroughemail(ironicallytheanswers showed theywereable to dojustthat). With the evidence available DATA and CAinfo Uruguay filed a legal complaint tothe UruguayanFOI regulator (Access to Information Unit) to urge uruguayan state authorities to answer FOI requestthroughemails.
The regulator followed swiftly issuing an order to accept Quesabes.uy requests and solving a set of complexlegaldilemasforuruguayanpublicadministrators.
software. Yet the crucial point has been made: the state has to answer FOI requests through email in the 21st century.