Sub: Filing perjury, breach of contracts case etc.

against the agents and witnesses of the ULIPs of Bajaj

Allianz Insurance Company and Standard Chartered Bank, India

I shall not commit the grievous sin of losing faith in Man.

-- Crisis of Civilization, Rabindranath Tagore

This is to inform you that I have four policies with Bajaj Allianz Insurance Company. All the policies were
mediated by the Standard Chartered Bank, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
The policies are as follows:

I.

POLICY
NOS.

DOC

SUM
ASSURED

PREMIUM

LAST
PREMIUM

DOM

AGENTS

WITNESSES

0160209908

20/03/10
.

Rs. 250000

Rs. 50000

20.03.16

20.03.20.

Arnab
Sengupta

Debabrata
Choudhury

Agent Code:
5111012820

II.

0132842390

28/08/09

Rs. 125000

Rs. 25000

28.08.18.

28.08.19.

Sharmishtha
Das
Agent Code:
5111006665

III.

0000318843

26/04/02

Rs. 200000

Rs. 7362

26.04.21.

26.04.22

IV.

0184158148

17/03/11

Rs. 300000

Rs. 60000

??????

??????

SCB

Acronyms: DOC: Date of commencement; DOM: Date of Maturity; SCB: Standard Chartered Bank
The allegations are against the following witnesses, my trusted above-mentioned Banks faithful
employees and my ex-friends, who had signed my policy documents along with me:

Rupanjan
Chatterjee

1. Debabrata Choudhury
Cell: 9830185334
Standard Chartered Bank, Shyambajar Branch
21 A R. G. Kar Road, Kolkata- 700004
Name not written in capital alphabet in the bond
2. Rupanjan Chatterjee
Cell phone no. not available.
Standard Chartered Bank, Shyambajar Branch
21 A R. G. Kar Road, Kolkata- 700004
3. Arnab Sengupta
Address not mentioned in the bond
Cell phone no. not available.
4. Sharmishtha Das
Cell: 9830470450 (Phone calls not attended by her)
Address not mentioned in the bond
Before elaborating the allegations against all these four persons, I must mention the following points
regarding III and IV:
(a) The III is normal endowment policy for my son, Akhar Bandyopadhyay and it was gifted by my
mother, Late Sova Bandyopadhyay to his grandson. I do not have any allegations against this
policy except low returns compared to Life Insurance Corporation of India.
(b) The premium paid for the IV was returned to me without any compensation in October, 2012
by SCB after much battle as my allegation was the opacity of the bondalmost nothing was
written in the bond, thus it had infringed Right To Information (RTI, 2005). This has a serious
implications for other policies (to be elaborated afterwards)
Now I am going to elaborate my case of losing faith in Man(sic, sexism unintended) I, Dr. Debaprasad
Bandyopadhyay, S/o Late Sadhan Prasad Bandyopadhyay and Late Sova Bandyopadhyay of Anekanta,
23/1, JoyNarayan Banerji Lane, Baranagar, Kolkata-700036, aged 47 years, by faith agnostic, solemnly
affirm in the name of the Indian Constitution, the following statements:
(c)

In the cases of policies I and II, the witnesses and agentsall of them were my trusted friends,
misguided me by making false verbal promises, intentional false verbal statements and
fabricating the true values of policies (Perjury IPO 191, 192, 193).

I must admit my fault that as a busy academician, it is very difficult for me to maintain my financial
portfolio. Therefore, I depended on Standard Chartered Bank (SB Ac. No. 333-1-011551-7) with a full
faith, trust for maintaining my financial portfolio. And lastly it is turned into a breach of oral contract as
they had made me to sign many documents without being given a chance to go through it. Thus they
exploited my innocence, honesty and dependency on the bank by selling toxic ULIPs.
Analogy: In case of intercourse with a verbal assurance of marriage and later on refusing to lead
conjugal life in the context of heterosexual relationship, the event of heart balm is considered as a crime

of cheating on the part of assurer. (Section 415, I.P.C. and as such prima facie amounts to an offence
under Section 417, I.P.C ). If so, why is it not applicable to other cases of cheating with verbal
assurances/promises?
For this reason, let me look into the proved criminal pasts of these two service provider, viz :
A. ALLEGED CRIMINAL HISTORY OF STANDARD CHARTERED BANK
Involved in Beirut bombing case in 1983, though the case was withdrawn for unknown
reason (2012). The same thing happened to its1992 FERA violation case (The Financial
Express, NEW DELHI, NOV 17 2012, 01:18 IST). In the both cases, somehow they had
escaped the allegations. The estates of victims of the 1983 bombing of U.S. Marine
barracks in Beirut have dropped a lawsuit against Standard Chartered Plc (STAN.L) that
accused the bank of concealing Iranian transactions that could have satisfied a $2.67
billion (1.65 billion pounds) judgment. (Reuters, NEW YORK | Wed Dec 12, 2012
8:58pm GMT)

Involved in illicit drug trafficking: The Justice Department has signed similar
agreements, withholding prosecution in exchange for bank promises to tighten
oversight, Barclays and Standard Chartered. All admitted to criminal offenses; all were
handed the equivalent of traffic tickets pay a fine on your way out the door. (Source:
The Opinion Page, January 2, 2013)

Involved in Harshad Mehta scam 1992 : Standard Chartered Banks draft red herring
prospectus to raise $500 million-$700 million through the first-ever issue of Indian
Depository Receipts (IDRs) has completely blanked out at least 15 litigations pending
against it in connection with the securities scam of 1992 and a foreign exchange scandal
involving the misuse of its vostro account, also in the 1990s.The prospectus has
reportedly been cleared by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), which is
fully aware that most litigations pertaining to the 1992 scam are still dragging their way
through the Indian judicial system. It is shocking that the Bank has attempted to avoid
disclosure, given that the Bank's deep involvement in the scam is widely known in India
and the IDRs are being sold to Indian investors. What is worse, when asked about the
failure to disclose litigation pending against the Bank, SEBI has chosen to not to respond
to the emails marked to the entire top brass of the Bank. (Source: Sucheta Dalal,
Standard Chartered tries to cover up its messy past, but SEBI is in a slumber Standard
Chartered tries to cover up its messy past, but SEBI is in a slumber April 14, 2010)

Involved in money-laundering in Iran 2012 : IN A bombshell statement New Yorks

Department of Financial Services added Standard Chartered, a British bank, to the rank
of financial institutions under siege, calling it a rogue institution. It accuses Standard
Chartered of executing 60,000 secret transactions worth $250 billion for Iranian

customers in exchange for hundreds of millions of dollars in fees. In a footnote the

regulator also says that there is evidence of similar schemes with other countries
subject to American sanctions, including Libya, Myanmar and Sudan. (Source: The
Economist, Aug 6th 2012, 22:07 by T.E. | NEW YORK)

Standard Chartered follows dubious distinction of Citibank, 4 clients duped of crores:

In yet another banking fraud at the hands of greedy relationship managers of the
foreign banks, some employees of StanChart are believed to have duped a few wealthy
clients. According to reports, a few relationship managers at Standard
Chartered Bank's private banking business here have mis-sold debt securities to some of
its private banking clients with a promise to buy them back at higher returns, something
which is not possible under the existing regulations. (Source: Economic Times, 30 APR,
2011, 08.45PM IST, PTI )

To veil all these misdeeds SCB takes its recourse to welfare capitalism that obviously maintains social
hierarchy at the expenses of our hard-earned money-signifier looted by them deploying unfair means.
They think that the gimmick of one-day-breakfast to the poorest of the poor is enough for eye-washing.

B. ALLEGED CRIMINAL HISTORY OF BAJAJ ALLIANZ INSURANCE COMPANY

Taking serious note of violation of claims servicing regulations by Bajaj Allianz General
Insurance, insurance regulator Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) has
asked it to scrupulously adhere to the norms. The regulator has also directed Bajaj Allianz to
put in place a system so that all claim/papers/documents are properly docketed. PTI, Jan 8,
2013 (Source: The Hindu Business Line)

Bajaj Allianz to pay Rs 16.65 lakh compensation to road mishap victim' s(Mahinder Babber)
family. The tractor driver and its owner did not contest the case while the insurance company
contended that the accident took place due to the deceased Babber's negligence. The insurance
company said the truck driver and owner were liable to pay the compensation amount as the
driver was not holding a valid driving license at the time of accident. PTI: NEW DELHI, MAR 06
2013, 17:04 IST (Source: The Financial Express)
Criminal complaint against Bajaj Allianz, Team Life Care Insurance: Both the companies
indulged in all types of violations while selling insurance policies. No policy should charge more
than 40 per cent as charges from the policy amount as per the Insurance Act, 1938. But in this
case almost 70 per cent has gone as premium charges. As per the Section 41 of Insurance Act,
1938, no agent whether Individual or corporate agent should employ sub-agents to sell
insurance policies. With the connivance of Bajaj Allianz, the Team Life Care Insurance is
indulging in such malpractices. (Source: Corporate Frauds Watch, THURSDAY, 20 NOVEMBER
2008)

Keeping in mind such criminal background of these two companies, I must say that their criminal
mindset has been operating in all the cases of miss-selling investment policies in the name of insurance
policies. All these cases have strengthened my allegations against these two companies.
Apart from the abovementioned allegations against these two companies, I have further allegations
against Standard Chartered Bank:

In case of House Building Loan (Floating), beware of rigging/cheating! When interest rate is
low in the market, they do not decrease the rate following market! However, in case of
increased market rate on interest, their action is too prompt.
In case of redemption of accrued bonus points for using cards, you will never get awards as
the phone-banking personnel always answer, That is lapsed. There is no auto-credit
system! Surprising!!!

MY DEMANDS:

With reference to (b), keeping in mind the precedence, I wish to get back I and IIs full
investment with compensation.
I wish to get compensation for IV.
In addition to that, I need to have compensation of Rs. 20,00000 INR for causing mental agony,
depression, frustration, wasting my time etc. by selling market-linked products by verbally
suppressing facts.
I wish to know the utilization of allocation charges, taken for I & II through Right To Information
Act (2005). I suspect that money-signifier was utilized by the same ethical fraud (a neologism to
describe writing-speaking aporia) in money-laundering among terrorists. Not only that, I have
another query: What service has Bajaj Allianz really given to deserve getting 35%-65% (covert
and overt charges) of the investment over three years to administer the policy? The fund
administration charge is separately levied to manage the fund, but I am anticipating fraudulent
allocation of units.
Proper punishment of the witnesses and agents along with Insurance company and bankers.

Lastly, I am appealing to the concerned authorities, with a good faith that to treat this type of case in
holistic perspective so that, not only me but all the victims of such cheating could be benefitted. All the
victims are crying for unknowingly buying ULIPs by hearing false promises. Our country, from the Vedic
era, has been depending on oral transmission (archewriting in Derridean sense of the term) of
knowledge and wisdom. Indian citizens are largely depending on verbal assurances. In that case,
blackmailing (Sorry for this racist term that unveil white mythology) them with forms written in a small
illegible letters is a crime vide Taking note that fine print terms and conditions imposed "unilaterally"
by a company cannot be used to their advantage, a district consumer forum has asked the Standard
Chartered Bank to compensate one of its clients with Rs 50,000. It has also asked the bank to "remove

the hold on his account," "credit back Rs one lakh," and remove all annual charges. "It shows that unfair
trade practices are galore and such terms in fine print cannot be read to the advantage if persons who
unilaterally imposed these," stated the order passed by the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum
(district New Delhi). (Source: The Times of India, Jan 2, 2013, 04.41 PM IST)

Yours Sincerely,
S/D Dr. Debaprasad Banyopadhyay
11/03/13