Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
SO7-12-07-18.BRF.SUP.ACLU.JW Memo of P&A.pdf

SO7-12-07-18.BRF.SUP.ACLU.JW Memo of P&A.pdf

Ratings: (0)|Views: 38 |Likes:
LA Voice & CHIRLA’s Notice of Motion and Motion to Intervene on Judicial Watch’s suit against City - Motion for court to allow LA voice & CHIRLA to intervene in the suit
LA Voice & CHIRLA’s Notice of Motion and Motion to Intervene on Judicial Watch’s suit against City - Motion for court to allow LA voice & CHIRLA to intervene in the suit

More info:

Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

12/25/2013

pdf

text

original

 
iPOINTS & AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728
TABLEOFCONTENTS
INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................... 1A. Car Impounds in California ............................................................................................. 1B. Special Order 7: The LAPD’s Response to Impoundment Concerns.............................. 3C. The Instant Litigation Challenging Special Order 7........................................................ 5D. Proposed Intervener Organizations and their Members are Directly Affected by Special Order7 and the Present Litigation ............................................................................................. 6ARGUMENT.................................................................................................................................. 8I. CHIRLA AND LA VOICE HAVE STANDING AS MEMBERSHIP ORGANIZATIONS TOINTERVENE ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND THEIR MEMBERS...................... 8II. THIS COURT SHOULD GRANT PERMISSIVE INTERVENTION................................. 9A. Proposed Interveners Have a Direct and Immediate Interest in this Action and Can OnlyProtect It Through Intervention. .................................................................................... 10B. Proposed Interveners’ Interests Cannot Be Adequately Represented by Defendants. .. 12C. Intervention Will Not Enlarge the Issues or Otherwise Delay this Case....................... 14D. The Reasons for Intervention Clearly Outweigh Any Opposition. ............................... 15E. The Application is Timely Made................................................................................... 15CONCLUSION............................................................................................................................. 15

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->