• Embed Doc
  • Copy Link
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
U.S. Department of Education2006 No Child Left Behind – Blue Ribbon SchoolsProgram
Statistical Summary of National Participation
Public Schools:Public Schools: Total # Nominated by CSSO
a
..................................... 309Public Schools: Total # of Nominated Applied....................................274Public Schools: Total # of Nominated Recognized..............................242Public Schools: Percentage of Nominated Recognized.......................78%Private Schools:Private Schools: Total # Self-Nominated to CAPE
b
.............................103Private Schools: Total # of Nominated by CAPE.................................50Private Schools: Total # of Nominated Recognized............................50All Schools: Total # of Schools Nominated by CSSO
 
and by CAPE.........................359 Total # of Nominated Schools Applied...............................................324 Total # of Nominated Schools Recognized as NCLB-BRS....................292Percentage of Nominated Schools Recognized as NCLB-BRS.............81%
 
Number of States Represented.......................................................................42
aChief State School OfficersbCouncil for American Private Education
1November 2, 2006
 
 Additional Information
Public Schools Only:Private Schools Only:Geographic AreaGeographic Area
Rural37Rural1Small city or town in ruralarea51Small city or town in rural area8Suburban85Suburban25Suburban School withcharacteristics typical of anurban school33Suburban School withcharacteristics typical of anurban school5Urban or large centralcity36Urban or large city11
Types of SchoolsTypes of Schools
Elementary Schools156Elementary Schools49Middle Schools31Middle Schools0High Schools48High Schools1K-12 Schools4K-12 Schools0Charter3
Assessment Criteria and% of Students fromDisadvantagedBackgroundsAffiliation
Schools in top 10% in theirstate with at least 40% of students fromdisadvantagedbackgrounds48Catholic43Christian1Schools with dramaticallyimproving studentperformance in their statewith at least 40% of students fromdisadvantagedbackgrounds70Independent2Schools in top 10% withless than 40% of studentsfrom disadvantagebackgrounds124Jewish1Lutheran3
2November 2, 2006
 
Characteristics of all schools selected 
Smallest# of StudentsLargest# of StudentsLowest% of StudentsAverage% of StudentsHighest% of Students
Schools in top 10% intheir state with atleast 40% of studentsfrom disadvantagedbackgrounds1081726Poverty4056100LEP0749Mobility11331Schools withdramaticallyimproving studentperformance in theirstate with at least40% of students fromdisadvantagedbackgrounds821115Poverty4060100LEP01063Mobility01852Schools in top 10%with less than 40% of students fromdisadvantagebackgrounds1252505Poverty01139LEP0329Mobility0778
3November 2, 2006
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...