• Embed Doc
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
Adaptive Limits in Inventory ControlAuthor(s): Samuel Eilon and Joseph ElmalehSource:
Management Science,
Vol. 16, No. 8, Application Series (Apr., 1970), pp. B533-B548Published by: INFORMSStable URL:
Accessed: 06/03/2009 21:32
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available athttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unlessyou have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and youmay use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained athttp://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=informs.Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printedpage of such transmission.JSTOR is a not-for-profit organization founded in 1995 to build trusted digital archives for scholarship. We work with thescholarly community to preserve their work and the materials they rely upon, and to build a common research platform thatpromotes the discovery and use of these resources. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
 INFORMS
is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to
 Management Science.
http://www.jstor.org
 
MANAGEMENT SCIENCEVol. 16, No. 8, April, 1970Printed in U.S.A.
ADAPTIVE LIMITSININVENTORYCONTROL*
SAMUEL EILON
AND
JOSEPHELMALEHImperialCollegeofScience and TechnologyInconventionalreorder policies for inventory control,stocksare allowedtofluctuate betweentwo prescribed imits:alowerlimitcorresponding toasafetystocktoguard againstrunouts,and anupperlimit to whichthe stockisreplenishedfromtimetotime.Methodshavebeen suggestedforcomputing optimalupperandlowerlimits for the case of stationary demandpatterns.The adoption of two rigid limitsforcontrollinginventoriesfornonstationarydemand patterns,which include trendsand seasonalfluctuations,isclearlynot satis-factory. Publishedpapers in inventory control rarely devoteenough attentionto theneed for a linkbetween forecasting and a reorder policy.Amethodissuggestedinthis paperforcomputing adaptivecontrol limitsbasedon aforecasting procedure thattakes accountof seasonal fluctuationsand trends.The method has been simulated forinventorymodels with varying parameters.Invariably ithas yielded results which were equal toandusuallybetterthanthoseobtained by the optimal "fixed-limits"method.Forexample,inthecase ofa normaldemand distribution, andagiven levelof satisfying demand, thereductionincostsre-sultingfrom theadaptive control procedurewas foundto bewell over30%.
Introduction
The essence ofinventory control isto determine when toorder and how muchtoordernew stock.Most of the literatureisconcernedwith thefollowingalternativepolicies:s,S-also knownas the two-bin system,where an orderis placed when the stockleveldeclinestos,the order quantity being Q=S
-
s; the stocklevel fluctuates betweenthetwo limitssandS, achievingtheupperlimitwhenreplacementisinstantaneous.S,T-alsoknownasthecyclicalreviewsystem,wherereplenishmentis effectedeveryintervalTtobringthestockleveltoanupperlimitS.s,S,T-this is essentiallyans,S system,except that reviewof the stock isnotcarriedoutcontinuouslybut atevery timeinterval T;ifthestock limit is then below s,anorderforreplenishmentis madeforQ
S
-
s.There has been aconsiderableamountofresearchinto optimizationof inventorypolicies.Soineofthe mainconclusionsmay be brieflysummarizedasfollows:1. It is impossibleto draw a universalcomparison betweenvarious inventorypolicies,since the behaviour of severaldependsonthe initialconditions of the systeminquestion.2.Given aset ofinitial conditions, itcan be shown that atleast one of the optimalpoliciesmustbe of thes,$type.3.In the case of astationarydemandpattern, an infinitehorizon, a discountingfactor(a < 1)and when abacklogof unsatisfieddemandisallowed, an optimals,S policycanbedetermined, irrespectiveof initial conditions.4.Whendemandpatterns changewithtime,whenlead-times arevariable,andwhenunsatisfied demandislost,themathematicaltreatmentfor formulatinganoptimal inventorypolicybecomesextremely complicated,veryoften insoluble.Wag-ner et al[4],whoinvestigated800different inventory cases,demonstratedthecompu-tationaldifficultiesinvolvedindetermining optimal controllimits and suggested ap-proximate empiricalsolutions.
*ReceivedJanuary, 1968;revisedMay1969.
 
B-534
SAMUELEILON ANDJOSEPH ELMALEHTABLE1Casea
Cycletime=2Cycletime=4Cycle time=6
Adap-Fixed Fixed Fixed Adap- FixedFixedFixedAdap-Fixed Fixed Fixedtive limits limitslimits tive limits limits limits tivelimits limitslirmitslimits4 =0k=1=2 limitsk=0k=4 =2 limitsk=0k=1k= 2Mean inventory of138 128 179235 188 176217 270229 225 278 319finished goodsStandard deviation 64 62 55139286 86 77110 109 100103offinished goodsMean quantity of173 171 184198182 187197 202191 199 199 203work inprogressStandard deviation 85 85 9479 118 113117 100152 153 151150ofwork in prog-ressMean inventory of 170 149 171210 212 202226266275 267 305343rawmaterialsStandard deviation114111117109 160 147159 149198 195 197 203ofrawmaterialsMean total inven-481 448 534643 582 565 640 738595 691 782865toriesandquan-tityofwork inprogressStandarderrorof
17
---
24
- - -
30
- --
forecastPercentageofde-8986 94 98 93 -94 96 100 96 96 9999mand of finishedgoods satisfiedPercentageofde- 88 88 95 99 9495 971O397 96 100100mandof raw ma-terialssatisfiedOrderingcosts 374 356 373 416 217 225203 221158 153 158154Run-out costs3407 37091709450 2034 1697 1049 130 11371193 00
Totalcosts 126801203012370 14140 14530 1352015000 17240 17030166001880021350
Demand: Normaldistribution-Mean 50;Standard deviation 5.Trend: None. Seasonality: None. Lead time: Normaldistribution-Mean4; Standard deviation1.
In anotherstudy [1] of stockcontrol for a fewraw materials ina firm belongingtothefood industry,weinvestigatedthrough simulationthe performanceof the abovementioned policiesand severalothers, namely:Q,T-similartoS, T, exceptthat replenishmentiseffectedbya fixedreorderquan-tity Q (insteadofbringing upthe stock level toan upper limitS), the valueof Q isdeterminedbythe classicalsquareroot formulaforminimum total costsperunit.T,s,S-this isa combinationof the
s,S
andthe
S,T
policies,namely replenish-ment is providedevery intervalTto bring thestock level uptotheupperlimit S,but ifinbetween reviewperiodsthe stock declinestos,an order for areplenishmentofS
-
sis made.
T,
s, Q-thisisacombinationof thes,SandQ,TpoliciesandthereforesimilartoT,s, Sexceptthatthereplenishmenttakesthe formofa fixedquantityQ.Of these variousmethodstheT,s,Swasfoundtobe mostpromisingand it wasthendecidedtoexploretheadvantagesofintroducinganadaptiveelement intothepolicy byallowingthemainparameterss and S to be redeterminedperiodically.TheModelTheinventory systemstudied here wasassumed to consist ofthreestagesinseries:-Inventoryofrawmaterials-Workinprogress-Inventoryoffinishedgoods
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...