Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTERNAL ASSIGNMENT Name of the candidate : Rajesh Kumar Enrollment no. : 07315903911 Course : MBA-II Section : A Batch : 2011-2013 Subject : Human Resource Management Subject code : MS-112 Topic of assignment : VRS Policy and Its Effects Subject Teachers name : Ms Meenakshi Singh
CERTIFICATE OF MERIT
This is to certify that HRM Project Assignment entitled VRS policy and its effects submitted to Rukmini Devi Institute of Advanced Studies. Its original work carried out by Rajesh Kumar under the guidance of Ms. Meenakshi Singh. Signature of Guide Ms. Meenakshi Singh (Guide) Student name : Rajesh Kumar Enrollment no-07315903911 MBA-II Sec-A (RDIAS)
Page No.
4 5 6 7 8 9 11 13 15 16 17 18
Introduction
4
What is VRS ?
A voluntary retirement scheme (VRS) is a package offered to certain employees as an incentive to retire. It usually contains generous benefits and is typically targeted at employees in middle age and/ or those who have been with a company for a considerable amount of time (e.g., ten years). Such benefits often include tax-free severance. This severance may be so expensive that it causes companies to reconsider the value of a VRS.
Why a VRS ?
The chief goal of a VRS is to downsize the number of employees on a given payroll. Basically it happened in the situation of overstaffed company. It also happens when company has suffered a heavy loss either through financial crisis, Bankruptcy, Economic slowdown or any other reasons. On that situation company is unable to pay the employees salaries, renumeration or full compensation.
Abstract
5
After the nationalization of banks in India in 1969 and then in 1980, a large number of regulatory measures were adopted by Reserve Bank of India to improve the banking network and operations of public sector banks. This rapid growth had an excessive focus on quantitative achievements which made many banks inefficient, unprofitable and undercapitalized. Over staffing was one of the ills recognized by the second Narsimham committee report (April 1990). Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS) in Public Sector Banks was formally taken up by the Government of India in November 1999, with a view to rightsize the over staffed banks. VRS being an exit policy taken upon by banks uniformly to become competitive as regards the human resource management, it has posed certain challenges.
VRS IN SBI
The SBI was formed through an Act of Parliament in 1955 by taking over the Imperial Bank. The SBI was the largest bank in India in terms of network of branches, revenues and workforce. It offered a wide range of services for both personal and corporate banking. The personal banking services included credit cards, housing loans, consumer loans, and insurance & for corporate banking, SBI offered infrastructure finance, cash management and loan syndication. Indian Banks Association (IBA) formulated a VRS package for PSBs, which was approved by the Finance ministry. VRS was approved by SBI board in December 2000. SBI promoted the VRS as a Golden Handshake. Indian Banks Association (IBA) to circulate the voluntary, retirement scheme to Public Sector Banks as per their individual manpower planning. It became operational after adoption by the respective bank's Board of Directors. The scheme remained open till March 31, 2001. The scheme envisaged to assists banks in their efforts to optimize the use of human resources and achieve a balanced age and skills profile in tune with their business strategies.
VRS features
7
The following guidelines under scheme was issued by Indian Bank's Association-
The scheme allowed the banks to give the payment of VRS package in two
installments
Minimum of fifty per cent of the amount to be paid in cash immediately Remaining payment can be made within six month either in cash or in form of
bonds.
All the permanent employees with 15 years of service or 40 years of age were
eligible to avail of it with ex-gratia amounting to 60 days salary as of March 31, 2000.
Employees eligible for VRS but who did not want to avail themselves of the
scheme were provided with the option of choosing to go on a sabbatical leave for 5 years
Right of refusal to give retirement to the volunteers have been granted to bank
management, recruiting against vacancies arising through the VRS route had been disallowed.
Banks had been asked to undertake a complete manpower planning exercise before
offering VRS.
Scope of VRS
Positive Impact: Better Retirement Planning
A VRS can be an attractive option for those nearing retirement age and those who do not have dependent children.
Growth visible
In year (2001-2002) State Bank of India posted impressive first quarter performance with 21% jump in interest income and 26% rise in earnings. The bank's profits growth was however, trimmed by over 100% increase in tax provision
Social Justification
Retrenchment and firing the employees are not better options by which Labour unions offended. IBA has approved VRS which is justified which create social respect among employees. Strikes and Lockouts are avoided.
Willful Option
It is thoroughly based upon will of employees that when they will take retirement and plan future also. There is no any pressure.
10
Delays in Transaction
Delays in remittance and money transfer due to scarcity of employees from various branches for interest lost.
Workforce Burden
VRS move would significantly increase workforce burden and the government has now
disallowed new staff recruitment, forcing banks to retrain the remaining staff to handle new duties at the shortest possible notice.
11
Problem of recruitment
Due to shortage of experienced persons in Banking Service Recruitment Board (BSRB), Hiring & Recruitment become tuff task.
Competition inability
SBI had many strong organizational strengths and an excellent training system, but due to weak HR policies, it had lost its experts to its competitors. It seems helpless in market competition.
12
VRS inequality
Also, on occasion, executives or management have not been bound by the same VRS practices as employees with lower positions or pay.
VRS conflicts
The officers who were denied the VRS formed an action group in March 2001. They claimed that SBI had violated the guidelines of the Government and the Indian Banks Association. The group filed cases before High Courts in various parts of the country, challenging SBIs decisions. A delegation of VRS-denied officers even met the Finance Minister and also submitted a memorandum to the SBI management. 13
14
Findings
FICCI report stated that the Indian banking industry was overstaffed by 35%. In order to trim the workforce and reduce staff cost, the Government announced that it would be reducing its manpower. SBI, like all the other public sector banks, had little choice in the matter Banks would have collapsed if the VRS was not implemented. SBIs decision was taken in haste with no proper manpower planning undertaken. Theres no doubt that the VRS was mismanaged. It left all branches short on staff and managers and the remaining staff frustrated. That would lead to a tremendous increase in the workload on the existing workforce. Media reports also called SBIs decision to restrict the VRS as arbitrary, discriminatory and belying the voluntary character of the scheme. The arbitrariness and insensitivity at the corporate level had dealt a severe blow to the employees of the SBI and PSBs. Analysts felt that SBI was not able to realize the critical importance of recognizing inherent merit and rewarding the performers.
15
Reducing employee strength before technology arrived only led to chaos. SBI HR executive says that the decision was taken too swiftly to enable proper communication to employees. Usually in public sector banks, the management has an interface with the employees, offering them a counselling-cum-discussion session. But in this case, since a huge number of employees were in the process of exit, this procedure was skipped.
Conclusion
Post-VRS was just money-making machines. There were fundamental fallacies in the way banks carried out the VRS. A good VRS should be demographically aligned, based on age and competency profile of the employees, should have a clear-cut manpower plan and should be driven by keeping in mind future strategies of the business. These were missing in the VRS implementation among public sector banks. VRS was unwise move. Phased implementation over five or six years will induce an ordered reduction in staff would give a better picture of effects of VRS. For wider perspective decision, it is necessary to analyze the results of short term. Best-planned VRSs have an impact on employee morale which enhances employees skills and knowledge according to changing circumstances.VRS gives opportunity to avail the facility of future planning and career planning.
16
Bibliography
www.indiainfoline.com
17
Course Section Batch Subject Subject Topic Subject of : Human code assignment Teacher's name : : :
: A
MBA-II
VRS : Ms
Policy
19