Brains Violators Canada

X-rays: How to detect the ùltimate slavery device’
I. M. R. Pinheiro
ABSTRACT
Two cases of skull implants are mentioned: One leaves external signs of its existence and is
easily acknowledged by medical practitioners. The other does not leave any external sign of
its existence and demands the police to take over the role of the doctors, given it is being used
EVEN, and mostly, for illegal medical research at the expense of the rights of other human
beings. Criminalization of medical mistakes is an issue which is also dealt with in this piece.
Keywords:
X-ray, Medicine, crime, negligence, head, device.
1. Introduction:
1
I. M. R. Pinheiro
In this paper, we refer to the case of I. M. R. Pinheiro, whose CT scans slices are here copied,
as well as to the reported cases, as for literature, of people who claimed to hold slavery
devices installed illegally and criminally in their heads, but the claimed condition was never
believed by the press, or the dominant scientific media, probably because of the absence of
convincement on them as to the reports being accurate, rather than delusional, or
consequence of some other type of mental hysteria.
Basically, the history of medical mistakes on Earth probably dates back to the invention of
the drug industry. Apparently, when people started to become interested in `how much money
they could make at the expense of other people's manufactured interest in whatever they had
to offer', rather than interested in `producing meaningful creations to the Universe and then
getting appreciated for the real gain achieved, as for society as a whole', Medicine seems to
have deviated from its ethical guidelines in a progressive way, matching the voracity of the
drug industry as to make profit which should be seen as illegitimate, or undeserved. The same
process also took place in several other enterprises, such as TV screenings (advertisements).
At the beginning, everything had a nice basic intent, which has been, with time, deviated to
profit for profit, with people ending up subjecting themselves to `subliminal messages' and
brain washing, via TV images or posters images, each time their eyes, even slightly, crossed
over them. Some experts in Marketing claim that even a 180 degree sight of certain billboards
will induce the person to buy the product in the next stop on the road, for instance. It is
obviously the case that not every human being's mind is vulnerable to such `subliminal
Marketing strategy', and those with more philosophical formation, meaning deeper reasoning,
used to perform logical analysis over everything they do on Earth, taking every small action
2
I. M. R. Pinheiro
of theirs as having a World impact, are far less likely to ever be induced to purchase a single
product in the supermarket that they did not intentionally, and rationally, wish to purchase
before arriving there, or seeing the billboard, etc. Nonwithstanding, they will still be getting
brain washed by the same billboard or TV commercial, what might then be seen as
inconvenient to the least.
The problem with `profit for profit' reasoning is that the human being is not the centre of
everything anymore, and what becomes the centre is the money or the possessions.
Possessions which are deserved, holding merit, such as due to those who produced significant
contribution to the REAL improvement of society, are not to be criticized. However,
possessions arising from what should be seen as ìllegal or criminal mental manipulation of
others' are definitely to be criticized and never to be endorsed by rational people.
What happens then is that if every professional is worried about how much money they will
make in their lives, rather than how important and meaningful their contribution to this World
and society is, they will be willing to sell anything to the unwarned client coming to their
doors for help. This thought will undermine any mental trial of being ethical.
Drug industries put their sales professionals absolutely everywhere, and boundaries, or
humanitarian concern, is lost from the moment competition is established. Nobody would
need more than one brand of medicine if the medicine contains the same elements as the
others, or it is the best found. Why competition in the drug industry, or profit, is something to
be thought of in a far better way.
Unless each industry were competing for top personalized services, as to good treatment of
the client, with personal ingredients added to each mix of medicine as to satisfy the full
physical needs of the patient, their competition may easily be seen as criminal, and against
3
I. M. R. Pinheiro
the public interest, or against society as a whole.
Once the thought of `profit for profit' is inserted in society, however, there is no sector which
is not passive of ethical loss, what means more injury than welfare to society members.
People then start getting degrees for the sake of earning more money, getting better jobs,
rather than for the sake of having talent for the area or being tailored for that sort of
profession. Easily, that deviates people to cheating in exams, assignments, even purchasing
full assignments to only sign their names on the `work' they have never performed, with sole
intentions of social ascendance, one way or another (via money or entitlements of the title,
perhaps even to being called `doctor' or `professor').
The passion for the `title', or gains with it, rather than for the duties and ethics involved, will
make several general practitioners kill and harm instead of healing and saving.
Frey ([Frey 2004]) brings the thesis that 40 thousand people die in the UK because of medical
mistakes each year.
They say Australia does not hold figures on that, still working on it, and such is quite
possible; given not even information on how many cases a specific solicitor actually wins for
their clients one has been able to locate in Australia so far.
The problem with the medical `mistake', or the medical `negligence', as people who
obviously do not care decided to name such atrocities, or crimes against human kind, quite
gratuitous ones, is that it will obviously bring consequences to at least one party involved,
which will last for lifetime, and the party involved is not prepared to take, as well as not
warned enough that this is what they are at the medical practitioner’s office for.
The thin line splitting patients from victims of crimes is obviously something which should
not exist at all, as well as the victims of crimes in Medicine, for the principle of Medicine, as
4
I. M. R. Pinheiro
stated by its father, Hippocrates, is basically mentioned in the Oath, pronounced by every
graduate in Medicine all over the World, as a condition for possible employment in the area:
“Classic Version of the Hippocratic Oath
I swear by Apollo Physician and Asclepius and Hygieia and Panaceia and all the gods and goddesses, making
them my witnesses, that I will fulfill, according to my ability and judgment, this oath and this covenant:
To hold him who has taught me this art as equal to my parents and to live my life in partnership with him, and if
he is in need of money to give him a share of mine, and to regard his offspring as equal to my brothers in male
lineage and to teach them this art - if they desire to learn it - without fee and covenant; to give a share of precepts
and oral instruction and all the other learning to my sons and to the sons of him who has instructed me and to
pupils who have signed the covenant and have taken an oath according to the medical law, but no one else.
I will apply dietetic measures for the benefit of the sick according to my ability and judgment; I will keep them
from harm and injustice.
I will neither give a deadly drug to anybody who asked for it, nor will I make a suggestion to this effect. Similarly I
will not give to a woman an abortive remedy. In purity and holiness I will guard my life and my art.
I will not use the knife, not even on sufferers from stone, but will withdraw in favor of such men as are engaged in
this work.
Whatever houses I may visit, I will come for the benefit of the sick, remaining free of all intentional injustice, of all
mischief and, in particular, of sexual relations with both female and male persons, be they free or slaves.
What I may see, or hear, in the course of the treatment, or even outside of the treatment in regards to the life of
men, which on no account one must spread abroad, I will keep to myself, holding such things shameful to be
spoken about.
If I fulfill this oath and do not violate it, may it be granted to me to enjoy life and art, being honored with fame
among all men for all time to come; if I transgress it and swear falsely, may the opposite of all this be my lot.”
[Edelstein 1943], as mentioned in [Medicine 1996].
Of course there is no point in considering free work in a World moved by money and the
more essential a service is, the better paid its provision should be, trivially, adopting the best
5
I. M. R. Pinheiro
Marxist principles we have read about, which are obviously, and trivially, just logical and
sensical. And those principles also match the economical principles for sales of goods. At the
same time, service provision should always imply excellence, or work to the best of one’s
ability. However, what needs not to be lost, and should definitely ènter’ the head of medical
practitioners, with allowed subliminal work for that end, is the ethos, the `why’ of the
profession in the World: The welfare, or improvement, of the quality of living of any person
subjected to a medical practitioner’s attention/care. Therefore, if any, no matter how small,
harm/injury derives from either action, or omission of such, by the practitioner, then
punishment equal to damage, immediate, should take place, with exclusion from profession
after at most three of those (obviously proved cases, even if by means of a liar detector).
The intentions of this paper are then criminalizing medical mistakes and providing reasons,
via real-life examples, for such. We follow this sequence of presentation:
1. First case;
1. Second case;
1. Difference between crimes and medical negligence;
1. The ultimate slavery device;
1. Conclusions;
1. Illustrations;
1. References.
1. First case
Our first example comes from a boy with X-ray exposed at [The Age 2008]: The X-ray refers
6
I. M. R. Pinheiro
to an implant of a piece of metal in a boy’s head. This implant does leave external signs as to
its insertion, and its nature is easily identified and confirmed by the medical practitioners.
As it is easy to notice, the fact that we know a knife was sunk in the boy’s head makes us sure
that the metal appears as white in the black and white X-ray. Therefore, it is definitely sound
to assert that if a white area is found in someone’s CT scan, not being the area present in a
known-to-be-normal CT, there is a probability x that that area will correspond to some alien
piece of metal. In case the person reports awareness of metal in their heads, there should not
be, obviously, any doubts left about it.
One should definitely consider a 99% certainty on the existence of the metal in the patient’s
head/victim’s head in case that victim/patient asserts the metal existence, before the X-ray is
made, to any other person in the World.
However, the medical assumption for all cases mentioned at
http://www.thewhyfiles.net/mkultra.htm and also a few in [Mediaeko 1996] has been that
there is no metal in the head of the patients or that the doctor, as well as any other
professional, include the police, would be `playing insane’ if ever agreeing with the patient’s
statements on that.
Such a position not only opposes the ethos of Medicine, as put forth by its father, but it also
goes against all possible logic on Earth. Basically, opening the head of such a patient, or
performing investigations following their reports and finding nothing, is still better than
ignoring or not trying, also far more coherent with both the ethos and the sense of
Medicine/Justice. The likelihood that there is nothing there, not even an òdd’ presence, or
occurrence, is almost zero, once the departure point has been the comparison between the
victim’s/patient’s CT and one considered `normal’ by Medicine (we could even refine to
7
I. M. R. Pinheiro
same age and gender as the person under discussion, if willing to be extremely `boring’ about
it).
These people, however, all died with what should be considered the most basic right to life in
society being violated: The right to a fair go.
Basically, the police, justice, and doctors, are all providing services to the community in
general. Therefore, they are all obliged to the American golden rules for customer’s service,
perhaps forgotten in the last 7 years or neglected:
The customer is always right, by default, until we have exhausted pursuing their assertions
and proved, with 100% proof, that they are equivocated. Doing anything different from that
ought to be considered a crime against human kind as a whole.
Several electronic documents testify on the wrong doings of people in general, but in
particular of governmental entities and Psychiatry over defenseless victims. One must notice
that there is no worse victimization than that imposed by Psychiatry over people: Whoever
had an incompetent teacher who, instead of `teaching’ them something, ùntaught’ what
others had taught, knows very well what the feeling of being found outrageously defenseless
before an authority is. Damages to those in that situation last for lifetime. It is here that one
wonders, as well, why cases of abuse of authority are not listed as police crimes. Abuse
happens all over the World and does generate lifetime damage for its victims. Sometimes
criminally, or unethically and unprofessionally seduced by a male lecturer, a female student
even has kids and there stops her career forever. Basically, pedophilia is considered a police
crime, but not unethical and unprofessional actions, deviating in most basic principles to
precisely the opposite of the institutional intent with the student. However, whilst a victim of
a pedophile may have been victim only once and not only overcome all that, get happily
8
I. M. R. Pinheiro
married, but get immediate justice, or justice in time to save their brains, like the real-life
case we have witnessed ourselves, as from direct report of the victim, case of Rhonda N.,
whose surname we omit for not having her authorization to use her case, but we also make it
clear that we are able to prove her case, trusting her report and arrest of her father, a victim of
an educational crime will absolutely never recover, or rarely. At UNESA, Rio de Janeiro, a
lecturer, married, named C. (same case as Rhonda`s), oppressed students his entire life, never
taught what he should in the program of his discipline, astonishingly one of the most
important ones for the integral formation of the students, Brazilian Problems, gave marks in
super-criminally elaborated exams (no criteria whatsoever which were educational) at
random, or according to his targeted possible victims, and got at least one female student
pregnant, therefore with lifetime damage to her career and life, on top of them both having
injured the reputation of his wife for lifetime as well in top public manner, with the whole
university environment knowing about it. The female student may, at that stage, as it is far
more common, abandon studies there, and even if finishing the course, never work, or never
elaborate her potential for life and production in society. If this crime is not worse than
pedophilia, or equal, then the amount of evidence available for that reasoning can only be
false. The point was about authority and the power of decision over the life and future of
others: The educational example is to illustrate what people do even in what appears to be
lighter decisions, in terms of impact on the individual’s life; how unfair, unjust, selfish,
partial, biased, and criminal, people may get over others if ever given power over the life and
affairs of someone else. Of course any superficial investigation over animals’ rights, for
instance, would reveal figures that would shock any person of sense, and animals, just like
people, are not alive to be badly treated, sodomized, injured, especially cowardly, by other
9
I. M. R. Pinheiro
beings on Earth. Notice the figures regarding pets, as most shocking situation of all: People
who actually freely chose those animals to be slaved by them are, even so, negligent and tend
to abuse their ‘possible rights’ to the management of that life. A psychiatrist cannot choose
their patients, in principle. If it is in the nature of human beings injure to maximum even
animals they freely chose to slave, and slave does include a conscious choice over providing
that animal with all their possible needs, imagine what human beings cannot do against
medical patients left there, alone, with them, in a room, most of the time, or even with a
group of them, but with one determining the fortune of the subject…Therefore, rules such as
the above proposed rule, on taking for granted it is true that the patient holds an electronic
equipment in their heads if they declare they do and the X-ray shows 99% of probability they
do, and immediately ordering exploratory surgery, should be in place to make it more likely
that the individual holds some chance in the fight for minimum rights to life.
`Prof.’ `Dr.’ X, from Australia, 2000, caused to MRP lifetime damage, and not stopping by
the career and life, he still has been directly responsible, with his public affair, unfortunately
employed at the university at his suggestion, for the device creation and usage against MRP.
He did it because MRP never accepted his advances, what is ALSO very usual in Academia.
The doctor criminally denying the device existence is then promoted to collaborator in the
crimes of X against MRP.
Of course, if all the crimes which are this serious, as to the damage to women, more
especially (and one must notice here sexism is a World decision since the Romans, there to
artificially and criminally guarantee that males would overcome women in their performance
both in life and at work, at their own slaved expense (slavery, in modern times, may be seen
as paid positions, such as secretary, house wife, etc.)), become police case, of most basic and
10
I. M. R. Pinheiro
immediate order as possible, given the amount of extra damage for lifetime induced upon
their victims each and every extra second they last for, at least potentially affecting the
welfare of the whole World, as for what that woman could represent to society otherwise,
their victims will finally have some chance.
Cases of slavery which is unauthorized, highly criminal, and have happened via devices
illegally implanted in people, are found reported everywhere in the World, some having
ended up placed along with those groups which claim to be fans of extra-terrestrial stories
seen, by vast majority of society, as at least borderline groups of people. Sad enough!
One report on a few of those cases is found at http://www.thewhyfiles.net/mkultra.htm.
[Mediaeko 1996] also brings a few. In fact, it is not that hard to locate them on the Internet.
Cases with X-rays clearly showing abnormalities and exposed on the Net, however, are not
that easy to be found.
The case of Robert Naeslund is found in the public domain (Picture 12), even his picture is
found in the open, so that we may mention his full name here. Why is his case different?
Because he apparently found a doctor, Mrs. Kilde, who not only agreed with the obvious, as
for his X-ray, but has also performed due surgery and finally removed the intrusive object
from his head. His case does not bring an X-ray as we hoped for (similar to MRP or the other
cases here mentioned), it is infinitely worse, once the color of the object seems to blend,
even, with the color of his skull in the X-ray. Obviously the case that Mrs. Kilde was
demanded infinitely more skills to identify the object and do something about it than the
doctor in the case of M. R. Pinheiro, or any of those missed cases appearing in even
electronic documents available on the Internet, where the victim testifies, in direct report, on
the insertion: The X-rays show precisely something like the metal in the knife, as for contrast
11
I. M. R. Pinheiro
in them, and the doctors had the courage of denying the victims minimum ethics in their
performance as their `doctors’.
Of course, the veracity of an X-ray may be doubted if it does not come with the details of
those belonging to M. R. Pinheiro, here exposed. There are a few ways of getting images of
skulls, one of them being using dead people and their skeletons, for instance. However, Mr.
Naeslund is apparently a solid personality, appears with traces of surgery, and testifies on his
X-rays online being accurate.
Notice that the object, of the size of a string of hair, appearing in Picture 13, may look like
even a hair to someone else. However, the fact that it should not be there would have to
oblige any ethical general practitioner (even!) to order immediate surgery (at least
exploratory). The fact that Medicine cannot tell what it is for sure makes surgery even more
urgent. If there is no report, as from the patient’s share, on anything strange happening to
their skulls, things are even worse, for that may be anything at all, including a new disease
being formed which nobody knows how long it will take to kill the person or impair them.
The more time goes by, the more permanent damage, of now intentional nature, by the doctor
towards the patient having X-rays with them, will take place in the absolutely defenseless
poor patient’s body. Therefore, the longer it takes for any doctor on Earth to accept the need
of surgery and the existence of an at least severely atypical object in the head of the patient,
the more years all previous and current doctors of the person should spend in jail paying for
what they had the courage of doing to them, opposing their Oath, stated with, more than
likely, so much proud, by time they accept their titles.
To summarize on the case involving the boy, the boy suffered an external illegal implant,
easily identifiable by any doctor, and even amateur in Medicine, which must have been also
12
I. M. R. Pinheiro
easily removed by the doctor in due time. We call this sort of implant, which is easily seen
from outside of the victim’s body, implant of type 1.
1. Second case
Our second example is about M. R. Pinheiro’s implant: She has been a victim of a criminal
implant, which leaves no external signs of its insertion or existence. We compare her CT
scans with that of a `taken-to-be-normal’ person (or simply not slaved). Upon comparison,
we notice several oddities:
1. Blown-up right ear region;
1. Èaten-away’ white material (as for CT presentation color);
1. Symmetric holes on back of brains.
Besides, in comparing CT scan I with II, we also notice formation of synapses by the back of
brains, phenomenon never reported before in the medical literature.
When we match these facts with the early reports of M. R. Pinheiro, long before she had her
first CT scan, of any sort, we realize there is no room for doubts.
In 2004, before having the CT, the female victim had reported moves of another female, of
advanced age, as to imply picking an object from her right pocket, something which hid
perfectly in her fist, and the feeling that the lady had then inserted the object in her head in
angle, dropping it inside of her right ear with her experiencing a rush of (less than one second
lasting) cold in the èar corridor’.
Considering her history on Earth and the fact that she had been born via surgery in the belly
region (only procedure which guarantees perfection of the head, provided no problems have
13
I. M. R. Pinheiro
naturally occurred in the fetus formation/development), the likelihood that her ear was
already `blown up’ would be close to zero percent.
Besides, she had had ‘OPGs’ taken throughout her life that far and the simple superficial
analysis of the ÒPGs’ (panoramic dental image) reveals perfection and balance of structures,
as well as equal distribution, in what regards ear regions.
Also, her first CT scan, with copy not accessible to us, clearly brought an òdd’ ball resting
by the ear bag (right ear again) in 2004. M. R. Pinheiro did insist, with strength, that the ball
was an exotic presence in her ear region. Of course, it was on the duty of the doctor
recommending surgery to at least fully investigate the ball, if nothing else. However, what the
female practitioner does (G. P.) is stating that the occurrence was trivial because not only she
had thought it to be normal, but the laboratory (these days they print diagnosis in the own CT
results) also had. It is not easy at all to accept human incompetence, especially in such crucial
sectors of human production, where their critical/unprofessional action/omission may dictate
whether a patient will get `saved’ or `condemned’, in terms of at least future pain or injury.
One may wonder why the laboratory would assert normality in the results... There is a high
chance the laboratory worries solely about the specific query of the patient, either relying on
computer limitations of screening of head or concentrating on specific parts of the head
themselves. However, the doctor is far more than any machine and obviously has better, or
more comprehensive formation, than the laboratory personnel. Therefore, a doctor with ethics
cannot, ever, use the laboratory diagnosis as excuse, or basis, for justification of their
professional public statements.
This initial ball happened to actually be `the ultimate slavery device’, created some when in
time between end of 2001 and middle of 2003. Its creation relates directly to the
14
I. M. R. Pinheiro
Biotechnology Industry, which we know means mixing the human body elements with
technology, or so we wish for its full meaning to be (some people consider it to be more than
that and to include artificial and scientific manipulation of that all, not necessarily mixing
technology with body materials for longer than a surgery duration, for instance).
One may not realize, but the `cyborg’ era has started long ago, with the creation of the first
machine to àid the human body’ via connection to it. This specific monstrosity, the ultimate,
however, has been created with criminal objectives, therefore never part of any authorized
research project on Earth, and not funded by any ethical company. Unfortunately, lots of
people might have become the victims of such a monstrosity, going on since at least 2003 in
the World: All because both doctors and justice makers took precisely the opposite to the
logical choice and hang on to the one percent of chance that both the report of M. R. Pinheiro
and the images here reproduced were not accurate.
Trivially, symmetric holes do not appear in human brains via disease of any sort, especially
more than one. Worse, there is also no disease which `makes bridges’ between selected pieces
of the brains. The fact that a clear track had been noticed in 2004 in the X ray, as originating
by the ear corridor, going up the drums and ending at the back of the ear, makes of both
laboratory and G. P. real life criminals/assassins.
To summarize, M. R. Pinheiro’s case would be a case of an internal illegal implant,
impossible to be noticed by any person without having CT scans to read from, should be
easily detectable and acknowledged by doctors, but has proved itself to be the hardest event
ever in terms of being confirmed by a doctor, with not only M. R. Pinheiro dying with no
justice, obliged to watch her entire body resources used by atrocious violators, instead of
herself, but with several other cases of victims, who could easily have saved themselves from
15
I. M. R. Pinheiro
the device if ever warned, being observed in the World without a single ethical medical report
ever (Feb. 2009), some actually dying from its insertion and presence in their bodies, even
hours after the illegal implantation took place. Her type of implant will be classified by us as
Type 2.
3. Difference between crimes and medical negligence
It is obviously the case that the only difference between the crimes listed in the criminal
codes and the so called medical negligence is the size of the punishment. As for the damage,
both are equal: No doubts there. The problem, obviously, is that several professionals think of
themselves as superior to a normal person or are seen, by the vast majority of people, as
superior to them. However, if people are seen as bearing the same nature before the laws, and
any person may end up being a victim of either situation (crime or medical negligence) then
the punishment should be of same nature for both cases.
What counts the most is not the intention of actually damaging the patient during a procedure
or a consultation, but the fact that the doctor had the courage of, when aware of their
incompetence to judge the case, even if partial, not declare, in the open, to the patient, that
they were aware of it. Basically, the principle of freedom and that of equality of all, before
any service provision and the law, does imply the person being aware, fully aware, of both
the laws in place and the standards of the service being received. Of course the patient cannot
be regarded as someone who may judge, by default, whether a doctor, or any other
professional, from any other field, is competent to do what they claim they are competent to
do in a public way. Obviously the case that all the control, as well as inspection processes,
16
I. M. R. Pinheiro
has to be external to both the patient and the professional, and the government is even more
accountable for a medical mistake than the doctor, whenever the concern and authorities for
immediate action are not present there, in the relationship formed between them, even if with
frugal intentions, by the time it is established.
We do not hold one or two patients who lose their lives in unnecessary operations claimed to
be urgently needed by doctors in a certain Country per year; figures are incredibly high,
instead, as well as unbelievable. If ever every Country were obliged to list, sincerely, their
cases of medical negligence, nobody would stop self-instructing themselves in every piece of
Medicine and holding severe disrespect for the profession. Easy mechanisms of punishment
may be put in place such as under paying the category in general until all practitioners present
mistake zero, or progressively increase, from top diminishment in pay, as the figures
decrease, as for medical mistakes.
An informed patient will have a free choice, basic condition for human rights, and that is the
only way to be fair. The problem with the usual criminal is obviously the disloyalty of the
attack and the impossibility of the victim of escaping gratuitous and unprovoked aggression
or violence. That is why they are so well punished, even though some disagree and think they
are under-punished for what they do.
Once the patients receive sincere information from the doctor, as to their competence to judge
certain disease presence, and etc., they are finally in a loyal relationship and the doctor leaves
the position of equality to any usual criminal.
Whilst such does not happen and the patient is left with no choice, even in terms of showing
their CTs to other doctors (carrying them, or a copy), as it has happened to MRP in 2004, the
police should be the adequate authority for denouncement by the patient/victim of any
17
I. M. R. Pinheiro
medical mistakes and all of them should be regarded as ordinary crimes which generate same
loss to victims (one arm, one leg, one ear, one year of life, etc.) as the usual crimes.
4. The ultimate slavery device and how such a criminal tool, of Dantesque proportions,
has not been brought to the open yet, but has been used against human beings for at
least five years so far, considering the date of this paper writing as a basis.
The reasons would be:
1. Chance that quite a few medical professionals have graduated showing clear impossibility
of ever respecting the Oath, especially in its main underlying reason; some revealing
themselves psychopaths by the undergraduate course, with the entire body of students, as
well as concerned staff, available to testify on all the signs of psychopathy in their minds
already back then;
1. Chance that quite a few practitioners ARE actually out there, right now, performing worst
World atrocities, mostly against women, and nobody is there to stop them in time, that is,
before the next patient becomes their victim (please consider [Kristen 2008] as proof
here);
1. Existence of implants which do not display any external sign of their insertion, and
existence of own implants, in general, with insertion still experiencing generalized denial
by all scientific and medical media, such implants being passive of varied criminal usage,
but representing special extraordinary danger to most violated class of people in the
World: The women;
18
I. M. R. Pinheiro
1. Easy proof that the theory taught in Medicine implies surgery recommendation as soon as
oddity is found in any X-ray of any patient, an oddity being an image which is definitely
not usually present in all other people in the Universe who have not had either personal
reports or findings relating abnormalities, but also easy proof of rejection of most basic
ethical recommendation for this sort of case by the medical practitioners;
1. Permissive character of the Australian society, as to human rights breach, not only with
clear generalized allowance for it to happen, but also with generalized absence of
punishment for those making the breach possible, or even making the breach themselves;
1. Brazilian decision, as a Country, of obstructing and hiding any possible achievement of
highest order, by Brazilian females, at any expense, and also of criminally attacking
easiest victims of all, honest women;
1. Generalized chauvinistic attitude, involving crimes of highest order, of the entire World
towards every woman who is perceived, by vast majority of it, as better than a male, in
any regards;
1. Proof of generalized incompetence, supported by society in general, of all medical
practitioners for very long (so, doctors would be taking more over themselves than they
can actually take, perhaps not having conscious understanding that it is more than what
they are capable of actually coping with).
Astonishing enough, we realized that all the above points could not be easier to be proven
correct with minimum effort.
Proofs:
1. Existence of implants (c):
19
I. M. R. Pinheiro
It is obviously the case that nobody doubts their existence, for even implants for hearing exist
and are advertised all over the World. See, then, in what regards LEGAL implants, the
following sources, as example: [Joe 2008] and [Surf 2008].
If legal implants do exist for sure, and we take breast and ear as examples, of course implants
DO EXIST in general.
Once research is always ahead of whatever is advertised, for only solidified research may be
allowed to be advertised, it is then quite possible that several variations of implants exist.
Besides, given the development noticed in the movies material and in the Telecommunication
in general, as well as computers, it is easy to infer that everything progresses to
miniaturization and long-lasting devices of broadest range of action. Given we now use solar
energy to feed our electrical equipment, that resource being always available and the
equipment being always fed of electricity, obviously the case that it is simply natural to infer
Biotechnology either evolves to fully autonomous electronic gadgets, feeding from body
energy, somehow, or is already there. Given the robots technology development, with robots
which may fully imitate a human in a few situations nowadays, and the movies dream,
always preceding the idea of the researchers, of having cyborgs in place of people, it is also
expected that either right now researchers are witnessing real cyborgs, made of previous
human beings, or such a thing is under development, what makes the misuse of such a
technology possible in real life for beings of any nature. Towards that direction, one must
remember, for instance, how they now are able to create full human organs in laboratory and,
therefore, implant hands, for instance, in people who lost them, which will look almost equal
to the natural ones.
20
I. M. R. Pinheiro
That the technology to create an implant which enters the human head with no surgery is
there, no doubts.
On its possible autonomy, as for energy feeding, also no doubts should exist.
On what people would like to do with them, when perverts, or escaping God’s rules, or
escaping what is implied by respect to human kind, this World’s welfare, etc., one may read
[Naqvi 2008] or [Weinberger 2007], as examples.
The pervert’s will is obviously infracting the laws and getting what they cannot usually get
from others via its infraction, still succeeding in not getting due punishment for all, that is,
both psychopaths and perverts look for gains which are unusual (usually people look for
money or assets, only, something logical, once modern society does favor better those with
them) for corrupt members. Those gains usually involve `copying’ someone else, plagiarizing
whatever they can, sometimes even thoughts, exerting sodomy over those who are not
masochists and never wished being in such a position not even for a second, injure others to
top possible injury, hopefully lasting for lifetime in the extension of its damages, etc.
Whilst perverts usually want to control others, and having a device inside of their bodies
telling them what the other thinks, does, etc., would be `desirable’, with them also being able
to `pretend’ the other likes it, psychopaths usually want pain, fear, incredible damage
inflicted in top disloyal way as possible to their victims, that is, they wish for the victim not
being able to `foresee’ the damage, and the more surprised the victim is on the attack, the
better they enjoy it. Usual criminals, like A. R. T., who has inserted the device in the head of
M. R. Pinheiro, look for either killing their victims, or impairing, or producing temporary
inability of reaction so that they may steal something from them. A. R. T. intended stealing a
scientific monetary prize from M. R. Pinheiro via blood attachments and criminal allowances
21
I. M. R. Pinheiro
of the Brazilian law, in principle (supporting mandatory donation of assets of a relative to
other relatives and also containing items which allow for even nullification of the Will of a
dead person via Court case).
The problem, of course, is the possibility, clearly allowed by the systems currently in place all
over the World, that a pervert, or a psychopath, gets hold of such a technology, which allows
either control or modification of a person’s most private and protected assets, as for the laws
(brains, body, etc.). It is obviously the case that death, simply, cannot be as bad as having
your only gains, with your life efforts, stolen or usurped by others, even for a second.
Devices allowing both voice and image transmissions, in a non-stopping basis, that is, voice
to skull devices allowing torture, brain-washing, etc., are ALSO very easy to be imagined as
possible, given that it is already the case that a mobile telephone, for instance, communicates
even in adverse environments by means of satellite power of transmission of waves. Non-
stopping energy feeding in a device, via biological parasitism, is also very easy to imagine,
for they already exist and are advertised in a broad manner, such as the solar watch, which
would need the person to go out with the watch on the wrist for solar feeding, or [Zarlink
2008], or [Than 2006]. Of course, in what regards Biology, it is all very obvious: If the body
manufactures energy to feed all its parts from the heart and its movement, anything which is
of mechanic nature could also be moved by at least the heart palpitation, if right elements of
integration are considered. Basically, Biotechnology is not a new discipline; it has been
around since the first manipulation of biological organisms took place, once it simply means
technology applied to biological elements.
If Biotechnology then is accepted as to label ONLY that manipulation referring to
technological elements mixed with natural organisms, it would date from the time the first
22
I. M. R. Pinheiro
machine was attached physically to a human body, or animal body, in order to remain there
not only for emergency procedures, such as the heart-pace-maker (See, for instance,
[Innerbody 1999]). Pacemakers work with batteries, apparently, so far. That means that
technology for the heart is still well behind the technology for watches, for instance, as for
what is found advertised (for it is years and years of research and experimentation until the
general public has got access to a single piece of news on the item under development. For
instance, Andrew Wiles, who is told to have solved Fermat’s conjecture proof problem, only
succeeding after finding a collaborator, a Japanese associate, had been working on the
problem for at least 22 years (1971-1993) (see [JOC/EFR 1997], for instance). Only after his
first public presentation of his solution he would have been noticed by the general public,
what means 22 years of research, in what could easily be the atomic bomb, or the ultimate
slavery device, during which anything may happen, including unauthorized, criminal,
experimentation programs, even via theft of samples, probes, and etc.).
This is to prove to the reader how viable any device of the sort described by Mrs. M. R.
Pinheiro is, or by Mr. Naeslund. Basically, to doubt the allowances of Science, one must be
infinitely crazier than those researching in it. Obviously the case that ANY general
practitioner who denies the existence of ANY sort of device, specially when X-rays are there
to tell there is no doubt about the odd occurrence in the particular spot of the body, with early
report of the patient as to what it is, should definitely attend some number of psychiatric
sessions before returning to work. It is obviously the case that patients of general
practitioners are not there to be laughed at, or scoffed at, and if denying the problem is part of
the proposed solution by a physician, then that physician cannot be part of their own claimed
profession, for the Oath lets it clear the reason for their existence in society is `helping’,
23
I. M. R. Pinheiro
ìmproving’, the chances and situation of the social members, not the opposite and, even from
a psychiatric point of view, there is easy worsening of the situation for the patient looking for
help, with a clear problematic X-ray, at least showing a clear oddity, about which no doubts
may be raised whatsoever (early report of patient on how the device had been inserted,
preceding first X-ray momentum, as in the case of M. R. Pinheiro, path of entrance clear in
X-ray and confirmed via oddities plus ball to that region). Basically, the maximum a
physician acting in the negative direction could possibly do is stating that `yes, there is an
oddity there’, `yes, your report coincides’, `but I am not willing to provide any help
whatsoever to you in those regards’, or Ì am not prepared to deal with that’, `therefore,
please look for someone else’, or something of the kind. Of course, the denial of an expert
over a clearly existing problem may mean the patient will never get treatment for the
problem, and that may determine, as in the case of M. R. Pinheiro, that a patient will lose
their lives without a chance or a choice. If physicians do not do the basics, as to their Oaths
implications, better they do not exist at all, so that people will not run the risk of having
others, who are seen as èxperts’, making public declarations as to harm, or worsen, their
situations instead of improving them. On doubt, no assertion should ever be made as well, so
that it is definitely worst crime of all that of the X-ray laboratory and the physician who
declare, in writing, no problems exist for that particular patient’s head, whilst there is clearly
no allowance for doubts, by all Logic on Earth, as to the problem being there. Of course there
is the need of creation of several bodies to inspect professionals, especially nowadays, where
only 10% of the workforce, at most, actually does what they should, theoretically, do, or
intend, in the provision of their services to others.
Without those bodies of inspection and control, containing professionals beyond any doubts,
24
I. M. R. Pinheiro
as to their competence and alignment with the moral values of the profession, or ethos,
nobody in society can be safe from crimes as violent as those suffered by M. R. Pinheiro and
those crimes may, definitely, take away all chances that a human being may have to a fair go
in life, that is, all chances of fairness to their unique chance of leaving their mark, their
signature, in the World history.
In what regards unauthorized, or illegal, insertion of implants, as for the victims of them,
nobody should have doubts either, one famous case being this, of Mr. Naeslund and Mr.
Wronge (see [Alex 1995]). On whether the Medicine `professionals’ are able to commit
crimes instead of doing what they should, it is obviously the case, with excess of evidence,
that they not only are able to diametrically oppose their Oath, from time of graduation, but
they are able to keep on opposing for very long until someone bothers, as it has been the case,
for instance, of the `genital mutilator’, recent public case exposed by all media in the World
(see [Kristen 2008], for example), the doctor who spent 15 years doing gratuitous harm to his
patients, having had at least 35 who dared complaining officially and denouncing, before ever
being caught. On whether the Medicine students are able to commit atrocities, against all
human and animal rights, only for fun, publicly displaying insanity and tendency to
psychopathy even before graduating, even so being not only allowed to graduate, but also to
`work’ (one wonders how this can be…), it is easily the case that the answer is `yes’. For
instance, the most notorious case of all happened exactly in Brazil, Rio de Janeiro, where M.
R. Pinheiro has been criminally violated in her head, internally to her body, in 2003: It was
about a UFRJ student of Medicine who simply thought ìt was fun’ to implant human ears,
from corpses in the laboratory, on the back of abandoned dogs he used to see around his
laboratory, in order to `practice’ operation techniques. After performing his highly illegal and
25
I. M. R. Pinheiro
criminal experimentation over the poor animals, not discussing whether they should have
been killed or not in order to cause them less pain and suffering, even before the atrocities,
simply for being with no proper care in an urban environment, he would then release the dogs
in far worse situation than that they were originally found at: homeless, probably starving,
with diseases, etc., and still with a human ear attached to their backs. Besides, there is also
the case of the humble male who has been kidnapped from the streets in order to have one of
`his eyes’ subtracted criminally from him so that a lady who `needed an eye via transplant’
could have it…After the illegal surgery, the humble male has been, once more, like the poor
dogs, left without an eye on the streets, believe it or not. All that has been well advertised in
the local media by the time it happened, quick research on the Brazilian newspapers should
easily return details.
On whether a `researcher’, or `professor’, is able to kill for precursor results, so that their
names appear in them instead of anyone else’s, when they have not earned rights to them, it is
obviously the case that the answer is `yes’ and these character faults start with exam cheating
and getting marks they ALSO never earned rights to, or deserved.
M. R. Pinheiro, in the same Rio de Janeiro, by year 1985, testifies on about 30 high school
fellows willing to even bash her up in order to steal her answers in exams. Along with her, E.
A. A. A., her fellow from back then, full name passive of being disclosed upon private
request, has also been a witness of such occurrence.
Basically, whatever a person `gets used to do’ becomes their rule for life. Authorship disputes
are incredibly high in numbers at the courts. It is obviously the case, however, that the vast
majority of the people never get to a Court with a dispute like that, so that the actual figures
of theft of authorship must be at least twice as large.
26
I. M. R. Pinheiro
[Lazy 2001] also brings some history of several projects of devices which would allow most
complete range of damage and infiltration in the brains of the victim as possible. The ultimate
could, easily, have derived from a `picking’ on these databases of projects and reasonable
amount of money in the hands of an unscrupulous person…
1. Permissive character of the Australian society, as for human rights breach (e)
In [Flood 1998], we get an idea about the Australian society in general. There, we find out
that at least 6%, of a sample of about six thousand women in Australia, would have
experienced violence against them in the last one year by 1996. Having into sight that
Education systems and punishment systems only degenerate with time everywhere on Earth,
it is obvious that these figures tend to grow, rather than decrease.
These results, they claim to have originated from surveys, so that they must be accurate, for
Australia holds the most unreliable systems on Earth regarding records of denouncements.
Basically, by the year of 2008, still, year of this paper, the Australian police could simply
deny registering a denouncement in their stations, what obviously undermines any true
statistics on crime, or even victims of them. They also held parallel annotation system using
personal notebooks for the cops, what, once more, allows that figures are never officially
registered.
The victim never gets a number for their denouncement, not even feedback, unless insisting
and coming back to the police station, obviously if still alive and in conditions of trying, or
willing.
On top, gratuitous aggression, by the part of the own staff of the police station towards
27
I. M. R. Pinheiro
customers, was seen at large at least until the year of 2004. They do have cameras in a few
stations, so that some of the episodes would possibly be registered in them, but then there
would be issues with access and interest of the government of Australia in this sort of
problem. Between 2001 and 2003, Australia practically sank themselves a boat full of
refugees from Afghanistan who would like to migrate to it, escaping from the war; at least
200 people have been reported officially, by the Australian TV, to have died in the incident,
kids included. That is obviously against the principles of human rights and implies intentional
murder of all the families in that boat. It is obviously the case that Australia cannot cope with
the ìnvasion’, or immigration, of refugees if it cannot even cope with its own poverty,
problem common to all countries where these refugees try to go. However, they are also not
allowed to simply kill them. The inhumanity in their actions is what makes all the difference.
Basically, a nation does have the rights of choosing who there migrates/enters or not, but they
can only do it via official rules and systems. It is simply absurd to establish a parallel system
to the internationally declared one: That is disloyal with the entire World and creates
allowance for cruelties well beyond anything which could be tagged as `human’. Basically, a
person can only play via declared rules and a Country cannot simply take whatever they want
from a person trying to migrate, or succeeding there, and then drop them, or not take anything
but kill them. The human rights principles were created to guarantee a fair society, therefore a
society where the rules are explicitly declared. There is only civilization where there are clear
rules of interaction between people: That is simply trivial. And if there is no civilization,
people must be warned before they try to go there. A Country which allows a person to
migrate officially but does not guarantee top equality of them to any native person is simply
insane, or `sodomite’, what is perversion or madness, therefore unacceptable as attitude of
28
I. M. R. Pinheiro
any possible government. Also a Country which thinks that the way to stop migrants is
murdering is obviously not human and therefore cannot be told to be part of human kind, for
desperation moments do exist, as in war, in the case of Afghanistan, and people are obviously
doing the only thing they could possibly do to save their lives, or try to their best, when
escaping like that.
In [Santana 2008], we find out, on page 28, that less than fifty percent of the complaints
lodged with the EOC-VIC go to what should be the end of all denouncements, which is a
session of agreement. However, it should be a session of arbitration by a third party which is
independent, so that the victim would have a fair chance. In the EOC-VIC, all they get, at
most, is a conciliation session.
That means it is an absolutely ineffective organ, there only for make-up purposes, or
marketing. Obviously the case that human rights breach is breach of rights of highest and
most urgent order and must be dealt with with full power and arbitration, with the weight
always much heavier to the side of those being complained about, once nobody would lodge
a complaint with a Commission like that, or at most one percent of people would, if not
having a legitimate reason. The use of liar detectors in those investigations would make
justice finally effective and fair, but nothing like that has happened so far. Not only there
would be immediate proof of lie by the person denouncing, or proof of the opposite, but also
there would be immediate proof of breach by the authority, which could not be more reliable
than it is.
The investigative powers of the police of Australia are as good as to allow a father of a
murdered model to prove ([Marks 2008]), after 13 years, that a person was a murderer in that
case, whilst the police had previously stated they were innocent, and this father could only do
29
I. M. R. Pinheiro
that because he made use of all best American police procedures to prove all. Just like the X-
ray case, this is a public, and international, statement of incompetence.
Unfortunately, in justice cases, until they employ the liar detector and accept it as almost sure
proof, we will all be left wondering. Scientific criminal testing should be 100% safe as to its
results, but the Australian press ALSO is as bad as their justice systems and traditionally does
not write about what is really meaningful, or contains essential information for an informed
decision on whether justice has happened or not. Basically, if the press does not advertise
things in full detail, an opinion maker cannot, possibly, determine how right something is. It
might be the case, just like Wiles’ first trial of proof, that there is some fallacy in the father’s
proof. However, the simple fact that the judge has been convinced of their points determines
incompetence by the police force. If the male is innocent, they are absolutely incompetent,
given they did not have evidence enough to convince the Court of such; if he is guilty, they
are absolutely incompetent, given they do not know how to investigate things properly. In any
hypothesis, what has been proved at the Court was the incompetence of the Australian police.
Besides, in a culture where justice only exists theoretically, unfortunately the case for two of
the countries involved, Australia and Brazil, every honest person is doomed to either have
acquaintances in the organized crime or lose their lives as M. R. Pinheiro did, even in full
slavery. Obviously the case, however, that people must be warned about what a Country is, in
terms of justice and crimes, far before they start living in it, if they are not nationals, having
at least the official organs, such as the Embassy of their original Country in the chosen
foreign Country, telling in writing the conditions for a honest person to establish themselves
well in the area, the dangers involved, etc.
Sodomy and gratuitous aggression/violence are trivial part of cultures with no real justice,
30
I. M. R. Pinheiro
only theoretical, so that every mechanism of protection to the honest person should definitely
be in place for alert and warning before arrival.
In a culture of injustice, obviously the case that very few citizens are naturally just, fair, and
honest themselves, otherwise justice would come naturally. Basically, nobody will ever
denounce or tell the truth spontaneously, not even if interviewed by the police, so that the liar
detector use is definitely a must, even if used by the police force in full secrecy so that they
know where to go in order to reach the truth, or actual justice.
1. Internationally confirmed medical incompetence for very long (h)
In Brazil, year of 1983, M. C., fellow of M. R. Pinheiro, was still found doing `dot, comma’
with his legs. By 1984, he confessed having been to several doctors (far more than 10) for
about 10 years that far, with same X-rays, and being prescribed Aspirin, finally finding the
ONLY person who would look at the same original X-rays of his leg, knee, and tell him he
had a `tumor’. Were the tumor an evil one, he would obviously be dead, or at least without a
leg. That has happened with the Brazilian Medicine.
In [Mercola 2008], one finds out that the top developed society in the World, as for 2001, the
American one, loses at least 100,000 people per year for medical mistakes.
In [AU 1998], one finds out that in 1995 only, from the reported cases, or passive of detection
by their studies, 68,000 Australians were either injured or killed by medical/hospital
mistakes.
Of course, if such a phenomenon happens with so clear-cut things like cancer (a so well
studied disease) and AIDS, imagine with the diseases of most difficult diagnosis ever: the
31
I. M. R. Pinheiro
psychiatric, those involving the mind. Basically, it is obvious that if even with diseases fully
passive of detection and of accurate diagnosis via X-ray, doctors still commit atrocious
mistakes, or hold what we here classify as criminal actions towards the patients, leading to
worsening of situation or death; imagine with those in which images are not yet used for
diagnosis, such as schizophrenia. Obviously the case that Psychiatry is a joke as an area of
practice: Could definitely be an area of human study, but obviously not practice, not the way
it is found. Basically, no doctor could, possibly, even dream of being competent enough to
tell mentally ill patients from those who are not.
Obviously the case that every patient should hold access to at least a book of self-diagnosis.
In the case of X-rays, it suffices a book with every part of the body, when normal, in an X-ray
slide, so that the patient may detect problems themselves. Also that the government obliged
doctors to provide the patients with free copies of their scans and X-rays, and ability of
reproducing those exam results as many times as they wanted (no copyright in exams, this is
absurd: Human beings are not merchandise, so are not their bodies!).
1. Brazilian evil character, always targeting competent women (f)
In [BR 2004], we find another reference to the scandal, which has generated the exit of the
female Minister of Brazil, first one ever until back then, Zélia Cardoso de Mello, in
Economy. She is responsible for the only time in human history Brazilian Economy started
resurrecting, or equating that of the most advanced countries in the World. The Brazilian
press is responsible for the destruction of the public image of the Minister: She has been set
up with another minister of the government overseas and it all got advertised in the media.
32
I. M. R. Pinheiro
Whilst in other countries, far more important and relevant than Brazil, with males playing all
repulsive share of the story, such as the US with Clinton, the episode would be discussed,
analysed, dealt with, swallowed, and the person would still remain in power, not losing their
professional value, in the case of the female Minister, so absolutely relevant for the future and
present of Brazil back then, in the most important asset of a Country, its Economy, she simply
got replaced by a male who would then take away from her all her historical meaning. Whilst
all her coordination and ideas lead to the only time of the Brazilian Economy in history in
which Brazil was either winning or equating itself to the greatest economies on Earth, all the
merit of the achievements would be stolen by the next Minister, a male, trivially arranged to
replace her in case it worked. Basically, all ideas, knowledge, information, obviously either
belonged to her or were `fished’ by her when putting together the right team of people, part of
the allowances of the ministers in Brazil. However, all the loins of such extraordinary and
`Herculean’ work were enjoyed by the male Minister who has never contributed to a line of
its results. Could also be a World phenomenon; once the same has been done to M. R.
Pinheiro, but she was not located in Brazil when it all started and the major responsible for all
atrocities M. R. Pinheiro suffers is definitely Australia.
Another case, well advertised all over the World back then, is the ultra-famous singer,
Carmen Miranda, born in Brazil: she got to be thrown vegetables over her whilst in visit to
Rio de Janeiro and presenting her show there. She was then a solidified international icon.
Such international fame, as for Brazilian women, is obviously rarest phenomenon ever, and
the fact that what she gets is top aggression, violence, all gratuitous, and people pay a ticket
to do it against her - just a woman, like M. R. Pinheiro - only testifies on the enviousness,
jealousy, disloyal competition, of the locals of Rio de Janeiro, at least, with a successful
33
I. M. R. Pinheiro
female, not mattering her area of expertise. So far, real life famous examples from Economy
and Music, as well as Science, Translation, Interpretation, writing, and etc. (M. R. Pinheiro).
It is obviously the case that Brazilians `compete’ with their female nationals who become
success overseas, and could not be more disloyal in their competition than they are.
Obviously the case that throwing things over someone else is as much crime as slaving a
person, so that Brazil DOES commit crimes against successful women if they become, or are
about to become, international icons, in any area of human life.
Carmen died by 1955, Zélia Cardoso de Mello is still alive, and M. R. Pinheiro is almost
dying. Brazil definitely does not have that many females who get to either become a female
international icon or are about to become, so that three examples should suffice to prove their
evil character over women who do succeed internationally, or could, like Zélia and M. R.
Pinheiro (Zélia did succeed, but did not àppear’; M. R. Pinheiro is the `life which could
never be, not even at the age of 30 years old, obviously with the entire Country not measuring
efforts to make sure it would not be the case that a woman would do/make it`).
A clear case to prove sexism in the Brazilian culture in highest degree, far more disrespectful
treatment of a female than a male, when they belong to the same métier, etc., is Rita Lee and
Cazuza, for instance: Whilst Cazuza has written far less songs than Rita, and lived less as
well, only Cazuza has been honored with a movie on his life, for instance. Rita Lee is still
alive.
In [Midia 2006], one reads that only in Salvador, capital of Bahia, 800 denouncements of
violence against women were being made at the special police stations created for cases of
violence against women (trivially due to their relevance, in terms of statistics) each month, as
for 2006. In [IBGE 2008], one learns that women earn far less for performing the same work
34
I. M. R. Pinheiro
functions than the men (the Statistics Official Organ of Brazil actually states they receive
60% less than the income of the males if they have tertiary formation in Brazil).
Basically, this is economical violence, financial violence, against women. This sort of
violence, and crime against human rights (principle of Equality, agreement signed by Brazil
long time ago), is obviously not declared or advertised: It is one more silent crime against
women at the workforce.
Therefore, Brazil is definitely one of the top violators of the human right to Equal Treatment
that women have.
800 denouncements per month at the police counter for one of the capitals, not even the most
important one (several cases will never be denounced by the victims), and 60% less than the
wages paid to males in the same conditions, ought to mean outrageous breach of human
rights everywhere there.
This all obviously implies highest World rates of oppression to women and, therefore,
criminally manufactured inability of the vast majority of the talented women to explore their
talents, `show off’, or become successful.
1. Generalized World chauvinistic attitude towards women who are better than males (g)
The best example is trivially Lady Di. Lady Di was definitely more famous and more tailored
for conquering people than Prince Charles. She was definitely almost becoming the next
Queen, not even needing any sort of formal procedures made, already considered by many,
all over the World, as the only royal representative of the Palace who mattered. Brazil is one
of the countries holding less similarity with England in the World, and after the princess was
35
I. M. R. Pinheiro
killed, she started getting flowers in the Country, as well as prayers, all also sent to her birth
Country, from nationals of Brazil, still getting them by 2008, by anniversary of her death. For
instance, [Blog 2008] brings another person from Brazil making updated remarks on her
death in a public and notorious way. The Princess has obviously been murdered precisely
because of her increasing fame all over the World and the fact that nobody knew about
England, or thought they were relevant politically to themselves, or socially, before Lady Di
started associating the power figure of England with her, even with her being `just’ a
Princess. There is no need of much elaboration to be sure it has been assassination, but a
reporter from BBC did make enough research to find out her driver received a visit from an
Intelligence person one day before the accident: Very exotic visit, never happened before.
Even so, the press and the systems, in general, will never declare clearly she has been
murdered not to be `the power figure of England’. Unfortunately, one more of the so few
women who could make an extraordinary difference for the situation of every woman on
Earth regarding injustice and inequalities.
[eNews 2007] brings a few details on the discussions. There has been at least a TV
documentary, however, screened in Brazil, with a British reporter, from BBC, who had
identified the visit of an Intelligence member of England to the residence of the Princess one
day before and the visit would have been directed to the driver. Obviously the case that, with
that evidence, there are no doubts left. Apparently, as other sources declare, she was pregnant
and did not want to marry the father of the baby, as it is read from the source mentioned in
this paragraph. Scandals in Royalty are plenty, but any reason is reason for old people, or
marketing-made people, to kill when they have power. The day people in the government
become totally transparent and human will be the day they do not have competent press
36
I. M. R. Pinheiro
assistants or marketers. If they ever became, the value of the so few like own Diana would be
even enlarged, for honesty and integrity, sincerity and transparency, would finally pay.
Such is, however, a decent woman’s World: A World with no lies, and yet no indecent or
criminal actions, or unethical. And this is obviously what would make every person on Earth
finally have a true fair go: Transparency, actual freedom of choice. The freedom one holds
these days is definitely highly limited by what the press wants to convey, or the Marketing
people. Therefore, there is actually no freedom and what commands the World is money,
rather than values: Something like `follow what I state but never what I really do’. Basically,
`play idiot so that I can live at your `slaved expense, even’ with you powerless and made
unable to react, relying on my theory, which I will never let happen in practice for you if I am
the one interested in using you’.
Several females, by Inquisition times, and that has happened all over the World, were
arrested, kept in underground cells, for purposes of torture and slave use, after all their books
of healing, knowledge, etc., were stolen from them and studied by the priests, stolen along
with their assets, usually inherited from husbands killed in wars.
The figures are quite high.
Nobody has cared, in the entire World, not even to give them post-mortem deserved, and
earned, status, telling the truth about who had exotic and non-trivial knowledge, desired by
every male from Inquisition.
It is highly usual, in modern times, that women occupy, at most, the position of vice-
something important. The reason for that is so that the males on top get their ideas, but sign
their names under them, with women not getting noticed, not getting acknowledged, and
getting far less pay for their services, as well as less social importance and less political
37
I. M. R. Pinheiro
importance, therefore historical. It is also highly usual that males even have affairs with
secretaries, which is realistically a reminiscence of slavery, simply to be able to consult them
in their decisions at work, once more giving them no credit, acknowledgement, or at least
equal pay, or equal work conditions.
Of course there are women who join these males to victimize and exploit the own women,
and that is the only reason why women cannot win so far.
The Bible actually has told us, via its stories of the `chosen ones’, to kill those who were not
righteous and respectful, obviously to keep the vast majority of society supporting only right
things and equal treatment, fair go of everyone who plays God’s rules on Earth.
These `lesser women’ are obviously the only truly responsible for events like the death of
Lady Di. Women raise the men, usually insert moral values in them, and are usually
consulted in all their decisions when males are connected to their mothers at least via respect
bonds. What obviously leads to the current outrageous number of criminal events against
women is the own `lesser women’s attitude’. Instead of supporting a female who is, for
instance, complaining of an unfaithful husband, several are able to go there and have sex with
the husband themselves after listening to the story of the female who is a victim. Women of
no honor and no value are obviously vast majority of the female population, whose
prostitution figures never stopped growing…
The enviousness and the disloyal competition with their own gender, the only ones who could
possibly support them in case of victimization, is quite common, so that a honest woman
never finds any chance for a fair go. For instance, there is a piece of news on the Internet
describing a female reporter being offered a fortune not to reveal the scandal over Zélia
Cardoso de Mello in Brazil. The woman did not accept money to be silent and preferred to
38
I. M. R. Pinheiro
simply `destroy’ a female icon publicly and notoriously. Did she need to write that piece of
news? Was she really doing human kind a great favor? The thing is about not depreciating the
image of women if you are a woman, of course, letting males do it, if anyone: A matter of
simple ethics and fair chance in the battle, once males never protect any woman, only males,
so that women will have no chance otherwise, once they will never do any different (males).
Obviously the case that non-trivial women are rarest thing on Earth and whilst the World
would protect a male who does not have half of the woman’s value from public depreciation,
there is no way the World would protect the woman from it. When Charles betrayed Diana
with Camilla, only notes were put in papers, not pictures. However, when Diana was going
out with Fayed, plenty of pictures were all over the place, with intimacy clear cut scenes.
When Clinton had oral sex with the secretary, no pictures of them together were published
either. However, when Zélia Cardoso had something with the fellow Minister, even pictures
of them dancing have been published.
There is obviously super-protection of ` possible male-icons’ and `super exposure,
immediate, of `true female icons’’.
Whilst the destruction of the female is painful, leads to total dishonor, and it is immediate
after the unethical act, or unprofessional, like in the case with Zélia, the destruction of the
male is nothing, with Clinton still appearing as power figure of the United States, with no
stains whatsoever, and after that still with a chance of keeping on being in power via his wife,
also with no stains to their marriage.
It is all realistically unfair, unjust, and absurd, in every possible sense.
1. Medical duty of exploring the region where any abnormality is found via X-ray or other
39
I. M. R. Pinheiro
sorts of examinations (X-rays being one1 of the most complete sorts of explorations of
specific regions of the body which may take place) (d)
There is no more basic knowledge and understanding in Medicine than that of mandatory full
exploration of any body area displaying any abnormality via any sort of examination.
Everyone knows that an X-ray may detect abnormalities, but will never tell precisely what
they are. A CT scan is an improved X-ray, and will produce more details. An MRI may go
further than a CT scan but cannot ever be made if there is any chance a metal lies in the head
or in the region to be explored by the doctor ([Net 1996]), for it is based on `magnetic
resonance’.
As sources of medical theory to confirm the obvious, that the abnormality present in the head
of M. R. Pinheiro by 2004 demanded urgent surgery, at least to explore the area in full, we
find, for instance: [April 2008], [Lightsey 2008], and [Adva 2007]. Even with tumors, only
via what is called Exploratory Surgery may one find out whether they are good or evil, that
is: Cancer or simple excess of tissue somewhere. [Gyn 2008] emphasizes the need of surgery
even for benign tumors. One must understand that ANY abnormal shape found in the region
of the head would entail either surgery or further exploration via exams which go into more
detail in that particular region of the body. Obviously the case that the negligence is an
unavoidable tag, but it is far less meaningful expression than what it should be: Deliberate
homicide trial against the patient, or at least intentional lifetime damage to their brains.
Suppose that M. R. Pinheiro is a `blind complier’ and simply accepts the verdict given by any
person claiming to be an expert in something. Then, from that ball, or abnormal mass inside
1 nowadays we also hold intrusive walking objects which exploit parts of the human
body from inside of it, they actually exist for very long.
40
I. M. R. Pinheiro
of her right ear region, a cancer may develop, and she may either lose substantial part of her
brains, bringing lifetime injury to her mental abilities, or die from it. Once it is all possible,
and doctors are there to prevent any possible further worsening to the patient’s initial
situation of loss, surgery has to be the immediate recommendation, or at least deeper
exploration of the region via another tool. In the case of M. R. Pinheiro, due to her early
report, preceding first CT scan of her life, MRI should never be tried, so that one would
definitely be left with obvious surgery and her entire brains, body, and almost entire life
saved still in time, by at most 2004, if the female doctor had EVER being ethical. Instead of
that, her brains were èaten away’ from inside, as the images here show, and a number of
worst World atrocities have been performed 24 hours a day against it using the incredible evil
creation of human kind.
The proof of usual rejection of obvious mandatory procedure has already been provided,
suffices the data on medical mistakes, mentioned earlier on in this very paper.
1. Shameful graduates of Medicine (a)
[Rosa 2008] brings witnessing on the intentions of fraud against the National Entrance Exam
in Brazil of future Medicine students. The fact that those were caught does not mean several
do not get away with it, what means that quite a few will not have deserved a single mark
from their exams by the end of their undergraduate course.
[Pro 2008] brings a report on someone who had their renal organs stolen from him after being
drugged via alcoholic beverage in a pub. This is quite usual: People need organs, there are not
enough donors to satisfy the demand, and some unscrupulous monsters go and simply steal
41
I. M. R. Pinheiro
organs from unwarned people. Fact is that they would need at least a Medicine student in
order to remove and keep the organs alive, or in good state for the transplant. Therefore, in
each one of those crimes, and the figures are incredible, there has been at least one marginal
from the own official Medicine métier. It is as shameful as it could be, once it all contradicts
their Oath in largest way as possible. The fact that people really do not test suitability, moral
values, adequacy, and talent for a profession, excluding via exam those who do not have it,
make it incredibly dangerous for any person to be around them. This remark obviously
applies to all professions.
[Letra 2007] brings reports on the teaching of Medicine and how animals are even murdered,
quite gratuitously, with own student not seeing any value whatsoever in those horrible crimes,
under the claim that they are teaching better with something alive being used rather than
observation over real cases or corpses.
It is obviously the case that if even the lecturers do not have minimum sensitivity, then there
is no hope for those learning from them.
Animals are alive beings and if some think we originate from them, then the association and
the extension to human beings is quite subconscious and automatic, so that killing a human
being is also nothing major, once killing a cat, a dog, to perform studies also was not, taught
to them in class not to be a big deal.
Of course it is important to defend animals, just not more important than defending human
beings. The defense of the life and rights of the animals, as well as those of all alive
creatures, will definitely imply subconscious respect for life in general, as long as it comes
associated with ethical and moral values regarding respect for the laws and other human
beings and their entitlements simply for being born in an unwanted, or with no choice, in
42
I. M. R. Pinheiro
principle, manner.
5. Conclusion
In this paper, we believe to have proved that medical mistakes are actual constitutional crimes
and should be passive of denouncement and directing to punishment via police stations. We
also believe to have proven that criminal head implants are a reality and any person is found
vulnerable to them, and their lifetime criminal damages, until the police gets to control all
aspects and stages of those crimes regarding implants.
Besides all of the above, we also believe to have proved that M. R. Pinheiro has been
implanted a criminal mind exploratory (at least) device in 2003. As a generalized conclusion,
there cannot be anything more urgent for any country in the World, or profession, than
stopping gadgets like the ultimate slavery device from existing, being distributed, or
criminally inserted in human beings.
6. Illustrations
43
I. M. R. Pinheiro
Picture 0 ([The Age 2008])
44
I. M. R. Pinheiro
Pictures 1-5 (M. R. Pinheiro’s scans slices)
45
I. M. R. Pinheiro
Pictures 6-8 (Head scans considered normal by Medicine which are, indeed, normal,
that is, with no presence of strange elements – ([Internet 2008], [Head Wikimedia 2008],
and [Johnson 1997]))
Pictures 9-11 (Part of the synapse phenomenon)
46
I. M. R. Pinheiro
Picture 12 (Mr. Naeslund’s case [Naeslund 1995])
Picture 13 ([Mediaeko 1996])
47
I. M. R. Pinheiro
1. References
[The Age 2008] The Age Journalists Team. Knife stuck in boy’s head: teen survives.
October 1, 2008, The Age. Accessed online on the 2nd of October of 2008 at
http://www.theage.com.au/world/knife-stuck-in-boys-head-teen-survives-20081001-
4rey.html.
[Frey 2004] Rebecca Frey. Medical Errors. Gale Encyclopedia of Surgery. 2004. Accessed
online at http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_gx5198/is_/ai_n19119888 on the 10th of
November of 2008.
[Edelstein 1943] Ludwig Edelstein. The Hippocratic Oath: Text, Translation, and
Interpretation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1943.
[Medicine 1996] Medicine net authors. Definition of Hippocratic Oath. Accessed online at
http://www.medterms.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=20909 on the 10th of November of
2008. 1996.
48
I. M. R. Pinheiro
[Kilde 1999] Microwave Mind Control: Modern Torture and Control Mechanisms
Eliminating Human Rights and Privacy. http://www.raven1.net/kilde1.htm, accessed online
on the 22nd of November of 2008.
[Naeslund 1995] When The State Rapes: The Mind Control Papers, Part 1.
Mediaecco & Contact Network International. Accessed via
http://www.mindcontrolforums.com/v/naespics.htm, `Robert Naeslund Photos of
Psychotronic Implants’, seen on the 22nd of November of 2008. Website created in 1995.
[Mediaeko 1996] Mediaeko Investigative Reporting Group. Brain Transmitters.
http://www.think-aboutit.com/News/BrainTransmitters.htm, accessed on the 22nd of
November of 2008.
[Alex 1995] Alex Constantine. Psychic Dictatorship in the U.S.A. Feral House. 1995. ISBN
0-922915-28-8, as found in `Wronge, Brian” online, http://www.namebase.org/xwor/Brian-
Wronge.html, accessed on the 22nd of November of 2008.
[Kristen 2008] Kristen Gelineau. Australian Doctor Charged with Assaulting Patients.
WTopNews.com, Sep. 10, 2008, http://www.wtopnews.com/?nid=391&sid=1475497,
accessed on the 22nd of November of 2008.
[Joe 2008] Joe Wolfe. Research Related to Cochlear Implants.
http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/jw/Cochlear.html. Accessed on the 22nd of November of 2008.
49
I. M. R. Pinheiro
[Surf 2008] Surf Pacific. Dr. Daniel Fleming. http://www.breastimplantsaustralia.com.au/,
accessed on the 22nd of November of 2008.
[Naqvi 2008] Kamran Naqvi. Voice to Skull. http://www.voicetoskull.com/, accessed on the
22nd of November of 2008.
[Weinberger 2007] Sharon Weinberger. Mind Games. Washington Post.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-
dyn/content/article/2007/01/10/AR2007011001399_pf.html, accessed on the 22nd of
November of 2008.
[Than 2006] Ker Than. Body Movement Generates Electricity in Miniature Device. Live
Science. http://www.livescience.com/strangenews/060413_nano_power.html, accessed on the
24th of November of 2008.
[Zarlink 2008] Ed Goffin. Zarlink Semiconductor: In-Body Microgenerator Converts
Heartbeat into Electricity for Implanted Medical Devices - Microgenerator taps in-body
energy source to help power cardiac pacemakers and ICDs supporting advanced health-
monitoring applications and therapies. http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/Zarlink-
Semiconductor-Inc-TSX-ZL-919128.html, accessed on the 24th of November of 2008.
[Innerbody 1999] Innerbody.com website authors. Heart Pacemaker.
50
I. M. R. Pinheiro
http://www.innerbody.com/image/card13.html, accessed on the 24th of November of 2008.
1999.
[JOC/EFR 1997] JOC/EFR. Andrew John Wiles. http://www-groups.dcs.st-
and.ac.uk/~history/Biographies/Wiles.html, accessed on the 24th of November of 2008.
[Flood 1998] Michael Flood. Statistics on Violence.
http://www.eurowrc.org/06.contributions/1.contrib_en/32.contrib.en.htm, accessed on the 26th
of November of 2008.
[Santana 2008] Samuel Santana. Equal Opportunity Commission Victoria Annual Report
2007/2008. http://www.humanrightscommission.vic.gov.au/publications/annual%20reports/,
accessed on the 26th of November of 2008.
[Marks 2008] Kathy Marks. Boyfriend convicted of model’s cliff murder. The independent.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/australasia/boyfriend-convicted-of-models-cliff-
murder-1029455.html, accessed on the 26th of November of 2008.
[Mercola 2008] Dr. Mercola. Medical Mistakes kill 100,000 Americans a Year. Mercola.com.
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2008/01/02/medical-mistakes-part-
three.aspx, accessed on the 26th of November of 2008.
[AU 1998] Australian News Commentary editors. Interesting Statistics.
51
I. M. R. Pinheiro
http://www.australian-news.com.au/statistics.htm, accessed on the 26th of November of 2008.
1998.
[BR 2004] CRE website authors. Sabino: das crônicas de jornal aos livros.
http://www.crmariocovas.sp.gov.br/noticia.php?it=5577, accessed on the 26th of November of
2008. 2004.
[Midia 2006] Jornal da Mídia website authors. Bahia cria 8 delegacias de atendimento a
mulher. Jornal da Mídia.
http://www.jornaldamidia.com.br/noticias/2006/03/07/Bahia_Nacional/Bahia_cria_8_delegac
ias_de_atendi.shtml, accessed on the 26th of November of 2008. 2006.
[IBGE 2008] Comunicação Social do IBGE. Mulheres com nível superior recebem 60% do
rendimento dos homens.
http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/presidencia/noticias/noticia_visualiza.php?id_noticia=1099&id
_pagina=1, accessed on the 26th of November of 2008. 2008.
[Blog 2008] `Recem chegados’. Top Blog area.com.
http://www.topblogarea.com/rss/Diana.htm, accessed on the 27th of November of 2008.
[eNews 2007] eNews 2.0 authors. http://www.enews20.com/tags-princess.html, accessed on
the 27th of November of 2008. 2007.
52
I. M. R. Pinheiro
[Adva 2007] Advameg Inc. Laparotomy, exploratory. Encyclopedia of Surgery: A guide for
patients and care givers. http://www.surgeryencyclopedia.com/La-Pa/Laparotomy-
Exploratory.html, accessed on the 28th of November of 2008. 2007.
[April 2008] April F. Exploratory surgery on Monday – URQ pain. Obesityhelp.com.
http://www.obesityhelp.com/forums/complications/a,messageboard/action,replies/board_id,5
368/cat_id,4968/topic_id,3743700/, accessed on the 28th of November of 2008. 2008.
[Lightsey 2008] Necoya Lightsey. Need For Exploratory Surgery Avoided As MDCT
Accurately Locates Bowel Perforation. Iconocast.
http://www.iconocast.com/News07_Files/A1EL2/News1.htm, accessed on the 28th of
November of 2008.
[Net 1996] MedicineNet.com authors. MRI Scan.
http://www.medicinenet.com/mri_scan/page2.htm, accessed on the 28th of November of 2008.
1996.
[Gyn 2008] Gyn[OB].com authors. Benign Ovarian Tumours.
http://www.gynob.com/GBUb.htm, accessed on the 28th of November of 2008. 2008.
[Rosa 2008] Adilson Rosa. Estudantes são presos fraudando na Unic. Diário de Cuiabá.
http://www.diariodecuiaba.com.br/detalhe.php?cod=320549, accessed on the 28th of
November of 2008. 2008.
53
I. M. R. Pinheiro
[Pro 2008] Pro-rim website authors. FAQ-Perguntas Frequentes.
http://www.prorim.org.br/index.php?goto=faq&view=ok&cod=pr47e917c561302, accessed
on the 28th of November of 2008.
[Letra 2007] Letra de Médico website authors (Alice). Vissecção em Medicina: prática cruel
e desnecessária. http://www.letrademedico.com.br/2007/03/18/vivisseccao-no-ensino-de-
medicina-pratica-cruel-e-desnecessaria/, accessed on the 28th of November of 2008. 2007.
[Internet 2008] Internet Journal of Anaesthesiology website authors. CT scan showing normal
brains. http://organizedwisdom.com/Brain_CT_Scan_Images, accessed on the 29th of
November of 2008. 2008.
[Lazy 2001] `Lazyhorse’. “Hidden M. K”. or “Why you can’t think straight”.
http://www.lazyhorse.supanet.com/~lazyhorse/document/hiddenmickey/index.html, accessed
on the 30th of November of 2008. 2001.
[Head 2008] Wikimedia website editors. Head CT scan.jpg. Wikimedia commons.
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Head_CT_scan.jpg, accessed on the 1st of
December of 2008.
[Johnson 1997] Gordon S. Johnson. Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
http://images.google.com.au/imgres?imgurl=http://subtlebraininjury.com/pictures_design/mri
54
I. M. R. Pinheiro
1.jpg&imgrefurl=http://subtlebraininjury.com/mri.html&usg=__28Edyq5OgL0eUmr9hVW8I
oZ4gNg=&h=245&w=234&sz=20&hl=en&start=17&sig2=5WCiKre-
Dhy21QjMVbqo_Q&um=1&tbnid=h-
HVe4XlgJ1W4M:&tbnh=110&tbnw=105&ei=W1AzSZCVLJu0sAPF0MjvCA&prev=/image
s%3Fq%3Dct%2Bscan%2Bbrain%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DX, accessed on the
1st of December of 2008. 1997.
55

Brains Violators Canada

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Brains Violators Canada

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

X-rays: How to detect the `ultimate slavery device’

X-ray, Medicine, crime, negligence, head, device.

convincement on them as to the reports being accurate, rather than delusional, or

consequence of some other type of mental hysteria.

inconvenient to the least.

contribution to the REAL improvement of society, are not to be criticized. However,

others' are definitely to be criticized and never to be endorsed by rational people.

be thought of in a far better way.

the public interest, or against society as a whole.

perhaps even to being called `doctor' or `professor').

mistakes each year.

their clients one has been able to locate in Australia so far.

“Classic Version of the Hippocratic Oath

from harm and injustice.

[Edelstein 1943], as mentioned in [Medicine 1996].

subjected to a medical practitioner’s attention/care. Therefore, if any, no matter how small,

via real-life examples, for such. We follow this sequence of presentation:

1. Difference between crimes and medical negligence;

1. The ultimate slavery device;

be, obviously, any doubts left about it.

made, to any other person in the World.

However, the medical assumption for all cases mentioned at

http://www.thewhyfiles.net/mkultra.htm and also a few in [Mediaeko 1996] has been that

society being violated: The right to a fair go.

perhaps forgotten in the last 7 years or neglected:

ought to be considered a crime against human kind as a whole.

criminally, or unethically and unprofessionally seduced by a male lecturer, a female student

super-criminally elaborated exams (no criteria whatsoever which were educational) at

crimes of X against MRP.

their victims will finally have some chance.

One report on a few of those cases is found at http://www.thewhyfiles.net/mkultra.htm.

that easy to be found.

performance as their `doctors’.

X-rays online being accurate.

likely, so much proud, by time they accept their titles.

from outside of the victim’s body, implant of type 1.

we notice several oddities:

1. Blown-up right ear region;

1. `Eaten-away’ white material (as for CT presentation color);

1. Symmetric holes on back of brains.

brains, phenomenon never reported before in the medical literature.

first CT scan, of any sort, we realize there is no room for doubts.

lasting) cold in the `ear corridor’.

already `blown up’ would be close to zero percent.

as well as equal distribution, in what regards ear regions.

sectors of human production, where their critical/unprofessional action/omission may dictate

computer limitations of screening of head or concentrating on specific parts of the head

professional public statements.

and the images here reproduced were not accurate.

laboratory and G. P. real life criminals/assassins.

To summarize, M. R. Pinheiro’s case would be a case of an internal illegal implant,

3. Difference between crimes and medical negligence

the punishment should be of same nature for both cases.

frugal intentions, by the time it is established.

decrease, as for medical mistakes.

are under-punished for what they do.

the position of equality to any usual criminal.

The reasons would be:

already back then;

World: The women;

ethical recommendation for this sort of case by the medical practitioners;

1. Brazilian decision, as a Country, of obstructing and hiding any possible achievement of

easiest victims of all, honest women;

1. Proof of generalized incompetence, supported by society in general, of all medical