Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
1993 Bombay Blast Judgment- Ibrahim Musa Chauhan @ Baba Chauhan

1993 Bombay Blast Judgment- Ibrahim Musa Chauhan @ Baba Chauhan

Ratings: (0)|Views: 489|Likes:
Published by OutlookMagazine
1C. Crl.A.No. 555/2012 IBRAHIM MUSA CHAUHAN @ BABA CHAUHAN Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA WITH CONNECTED MATTERS. [APPEALS FILED BY THE ACCUSED(PART-3)]
1C. Crl.A.No. 555/2012 IBRAHIM MUSA CHAUHAN @ BABA CHAUHAN Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA WITH CONNECTED MATTERS. [APPEALS FILED BY THE ACCUSED(PART-3)]

More info:

Published by: OutlookMagazine on Mar 21, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

03/21/2013

pdf

text

original

 
Page 1
 
APPEALS FILED BY THE ACCUSED(PART – 3)REPORTABLEIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIACRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTIONCRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 555 OF 2012
Ibrahim Musa Chauhan @ Baba Chauhan AppellantVersusState of Maharashtra Respondent 
WITHCriminal Appeal No. 1129-1130 of 2007WITHCriminal Appeal No. 402 of 2008WITHCriminal Appeal No. 617-618 of 2008WITHCriminal Appeal No. 1631 of 2007WITHCriminal Appeal No. 1419 of 2007
 
Page 2
 
WITHCriminal Appeal No. 1226 of 2007WITHCriminal Appeal No. 1422 of 2007WITHCriminal Appeal No. 1180 of 2007WITHCriminal Appeal No. 1225 of 2007WITHCriminal Appeal No. 919 of 2008ANDCriminal Appeal No. 1393 of 2007
2
 
Page 3
 
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 555 OF 2012
Ibrahim Musa Chauhan @ Baba Chauhan AppellantVersusState of Maharashtra Respondent 
J U D G M E N TDr. B.S. Chauhan, J:
1.
This appeal has been preferred against the judgments andorders dated 29.11.2006 and 6.6.2007 passed by a Special Judge of the Designated Court under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities(Prevention) Act, 1987 (hereinafter referred to as the `TADA’) in theBombay Blast Case No. 1/1993, by which the appellant (A-41) has been convicted under Sections 3(3), 5 and 6 TADA, as well as under Sections 3 and 7 read with Section 25(1-A) (1-B) (a) of the ArmsAct, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Arms Act’), Section 4(b) of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as the‘Act 1908), and Section 9-B(1) (b) of the Explosives Act, 1884(hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act 1884’).2.Facts and circumstances giving rise to this appeal are that:
3

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->