and what is his or her interest in communicating with the judge? It should benoted that Acker made no reference to the fact that the opposing party, theUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), is a party in roughly six toeight ongoing employment-discrimination suits at the moment. Again, thisdemonstrates personal bias against a plaintiff.
Near the end of one motion docket, Acker said, “I know the people at UABare anxious about this case.”
(See Exhibit A, No. 11.) How does he knowthat? Who told him? This clearly indicates that Judge Acker is receivinginformation from someone external to this case. And if that person is tryingto improperly influence the administration of a pending lawsuit, it couldamount to a federal crime
obstruction of justice and conspiracy.
inally, I have evidence that someone in a judge’s office in the Northern
District of Alabama is spending major amounts of time reading my blog,
which is about justice issues in our state, region, andnation. This strongly indicates possible prejudice against me, and evidenceindicates it probably is someone from the offices of Judge Acker or JudgeAbdul Kallon
or the judges themselves. I have copied the IP address,
which is from a “uscourts.gov” server, and it
can be traced directly to theuser, who might be improperly checking my blog.