On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 1:37 PM, David Pardo <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:Here's how Radack reacts to the allegations: ad hominem. Now granted,relations are and have been acrimonious, but the response by GAP (tothe extent there is one) is the same, but never responsive to the merits.You can pick sides, dismiss, ignore, or whatever. Or you can look intothis objectively.
On Feb 12, 2013, at 9:26 PM, "Joe Carson" < email@example.com> wrote:
GAP's business model relies on "the blood of patriots" asDrake/Kiriakou- look at GAP's fundraising letters, look at GAP's proposals to the few foundations that provide essential funding toGAP. Ditto Franz Gayl. We are your fundraising tools, abusedfor our good faith. GAP looked other way at 35 years of lawbreaking atOSC/MSPB. Now it obstructs efforts to expose and end it,including slandering me - for years now - as a "threat of violence."America is much diminished and more threatened by GAP'sexploitative business model. That is the truth and I want to be heldaccountable for publicly saying that truth. File a professional misconduct complaint against me if you contendI am making public statements in an untruthful and non-objectivemanner. While that is not grounds to file a complaint against anattorney, it is to file one against a PE in matters of public healthand safety - which this is. Or, if you want me to stop publicly shaming you, then publicly sayyou want Obama to direct a resolution of broken covenantcontentions at Office of Legal Counsel to prevent moreDrakes/Kiriakous - or publicly resign from GAP if it directs younot to do so. But stop exploiting - and now obstructing efforts toend - gov't lawbreaking at OSC/MSPB - because it producesvictims as Drake/Kiriakou for you to shamelessly exploit.
David Pardo [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Tuesday, February 12, 2013 4:12 PM
jesselyn radack; Joe Carson
RE: Just what is the truth of matter Tom Devine? JesslynRadack? GAP?