I mentioned last time that there aresome things we can do about global warm-ing. I’d like to start with one of the mostobvious, and the easiest: not lying aboutit. I don’t object to honest differences of opinion about the causes and possible so-lutions to the problem, but it bothers me toread outright lies reported by mainstreamnews media. The Washington Post madethe mistake in its Feb. 15 issue of notchecking an assertion made by conserva-tive columnist George Will, who claimedthat the University of Illinois’ Arctic Cli-mate Research Center thinks global seaice levels are the same now as they were30 years ago. TheCenter responded im-mediately:“We do not knowwhere George Willis getting his infor-mation, but our datashows that on Febru-ary 15, 1979, globalsea ice area was 16.79million sq. km and on February 15, 2009,global sea ice area was 15.45 million sq.km. Therefore, global sea ice levels are1.34 million sq. km less in February 2009than in February 1979. This decrease insea ice area is roughly equal to the areaof Texas, California, and Oklahoma com- bined. It is disturbing that the Washing-ton Post would publish such information
without rst checking the facts.” The
Center’s Web site (http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/) includes a fascinat-ing animation of the recent loss of multi-year sea ice.Will also misquoted a report by theUnited Nations’ World MeteorologicalOrganization (WMO). He claimed theWMO says there has been “no recordedglobal warming for more than a decade.”In fact, the WMO wrote in 2008, “For de-tecting climate change you should not look at any particular year, but instead examine
the trends over a sufciently long period
of time. The current trend of temperatureglobally is very much indicative of warm-ing.” The WMO added that 2008 is “likelyto rank as the 10th warmest year on recordsince the beginning of the instrumentalclimate records in 1850” (http://www.wmo.int/pages/index_en.html).EOS, an American Geophysical Union publication (http://www.agu.org/pubs/eos), reported last month that the more people know about climatology, the morethey agree that anthropogenic globalwarming is a fact. I have to believe that people like George Will who keep deny-ing the idea are motivated by somethingother than the search for truth, especiallywhen they resort to lies to support their as-sertions. If you want to know more aboutthe politics of denial of this issue, read AlGore’s “The Assault on Reason,” or justtake a glance at his Web page (http://www.algore.com/).But, back to where we started: Whatcan we---you and I---do about global cli-mate change? Thereare a lot of thingsthat individualscan do. You’ve al-ready heard some:turn down the heat,don’t use the AC,replace your in-candescent light bulbs with compact
uorescent light bulbs, clean your furnacelters, take shorter showers with cooler
water, wash your clothes with cold water,
use energy-efcient appliances, walk or
ride your bike to work/school (not pos-sible for everyone in this area, I know),work from home when you can, plantyour own garden and fertilize it with com- post from kitchen scraps, and recycle. Alist including these, and more, is availableat http://www.nativeenergy.com/pages/more_you_can_do/18.php. A great thingabout these suggestions is that they alsosave you money, while letting you feelvirtuous about helping the planet.If you don’t think you’re contributingthat much to global warming as an indi-vidual, try calculating your yearly carbondioxide output. One Web site that helpsyou do this is http://www.climatecrisis.net/takeaction/carboncalculator/. The av-erage for U.S. citizens is about 7.5 tons of carbon dioxide per year, and I found outI’m above that. But I’m working on it.
February 23, 2009
3
OPINION
Some time ago, I was listening to alecture about the teaching of history.“Up until recently,” said the professor,“we focused on dead white menin history, but we are beginning toabandon this in favor of the study of the people of the time.”“Dead white men” is a phrase I hear fairly regularly these days. It is oftenused in such contexts as this: “insteadof studying these dead white men, let’sstudy _____.” This blank is usually
lled with a progressive, cool-sounding
phrase such as “women during theDepression,” “family systems in 18thcentury Congo” and “egalitarianismamong Amazonian tribes.”The implication is that there issomething wrong with the way historyhas been taught up to this point. The basic argument is that we should knowas much about the village life of aYanomamo warrior as we do aboutthe work of Plato, Napoleon, GeorgeWashington, or Shakespeare. Insteadof focusing on the rich and powerful,we should focus on the poor, thedisenfranchised and minorities.All well and good. It’s fantastic tohave an understanding of the everydaylife of a 20th century Chinese farmer as well as an understanding of thekey players during the Cold War. Nevertheless, an educator will always run into the problem of limitations:what should we teach our students with the limitedtime and energy that wehave?And this is where modern educatorsrun into a dilemma. No matter whatsort of program they develop, theywill always be leaving out some perspective and thus will be betrayingtheir nonpartisan multicultural stance.Thus, by the time students reachcollege, the assumption is that theyhave been taught all of the traditional“dead white men” and can now beintroduced to other traditions and perspectives. This assumption is
inherently awed. As a rule, the K-12
system fails spectacularly to introducestudents to the dead white men,largely because these educators arealso interested in introducing studentsto other traditions and perspectives.Thus, high school students leave highschool with a collection of facts aboutcolonialism, American slavery andwomen’s suffrage but with essentiallyno knowledge of Shakespeare or Voltaire.
“That’s ne,” you say. “We’ve
had enough of the dead white menfor a while.” Ah, but this is a naïve perspective. For example, any English-speaking person with no knowledgeof Shakespeare is intellectuallyimpoverished. To read Hamlet is torealize how much of our daily languageand thought is indebted to Shakespeare.To not know Shakespeare is to separateoneself from 400 years of Englishthought. In the same way, Voltaire’ssneers are essential to understandingthe French Revolution: an event that
has inuenced every revolution inLatin America and Europe since.
It is an understatement to say ideasmatter. They have the power tokill hundreds of millions of peopleand the power to raise the standardof living for the same number.They have the power to tear downrainforests and the power to preservethe environment. In the wordsof Russell Kirk, “modern peopleare dwarfs on the shoulders of giants, able to see further than their ancestors only because of the greatstature of those who have precededus in time.”While it is all very well to study the poor and disenfranchised, we neglectthe dead white men at our peril. For their ideas made history and the linethat separates history from modern
dilemmas is insignicant. To not
know the movers and shakers of history is to jump from the shouldersof the giant and make our way blindlyin a dangerous world.
The Sluice Box
By Matt Hunter
T
he
V
an
C
ougar
Why Do You Ask?
By Louise Wynn
T
he
V
an
C
ougar
In Defense ofDead White Men
“No matter what sort of program[modern educators] develop,they will always be leaving outsome perspective...“
What’s your issue?
“If you don’t think you’re contributingthat much to globalwarming...trycalculating your yearly carbondioxide output..”
By Jake Kleinschmidt
T
he
V
an
C
ougar
Man on the Street
What are you looking for in a candidatefor the campus elections?
Cara Cottingham
DTC
“I want them to think about all students, including smokers. And think about diversity overall, and get out into the community and associate all. Basically be down toearth good listeners.”
Davin Crow
Public Administration
“More responsibility of the spending of the student funds,
I want the rst two days of the
semester to be free parking.”
Roxanne Doenecke
Education
“I would like to see someone with strong leadership qualities, who’scommunication skills are excellent who has the interest of the student body especially out in front as a goal, who’s listens to the students towhat their desires are on campus,and he or she needs to encourage students to be honest to insurethe quality of learning they arereceiving on campus.”
Kathleen Delinger
Biology
“Practicality, I want them toallocate budget items to what weactually need at WSU-V. I don’t have that much time for frivolousactivities. Some of the things theyhave done in the past though havebeen interesting.”
0 7 1 8 0 8 R 2 9 3 3 0 7 6
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, State Farm Indemnity Co. – Bloomington, IL
CAR + HOME = BIG SAVINGS
HARRY HOFFMAN,
Agent
360-574-5222
1307B NE 78th St., Ste 1Vancouver, WA 98665www.harryhoffman.net
Michael Bradley
MIS/Marketing
“Concentrate more on what’s going on within the school. More activateswhether it’s concerts or stuff that’slocal. So stuff that we don’t have to go to Pullman for.”
Marianne Bash
Library
“I look for someone who is willing to work on behalf the student body,while taking into considerationthe needs and limits of a collegecampus.”
Leave a Comment