retrenchment in consumer spending which in the last 6 months has demonstrated thelowest rise in 47 years. At a time when consumer spending is receding in suchmagnitude due to the economic crisis, it is unconscionable that leadership at any levelentity would propose or support spending initiatives that are unnecessary and orunwarranted.At the very first regularly scheduled meeting (if not provided sooner in response to myongoing inquiries) I will publicly request a comprehensive list of non-essential budgetitems planned or currently being implemented along with the taxpayer costs associatedwith those expenditures. I will request that a spreadsheet be developed (and madepublicly available on the town website) that details the tax levy upon residents for eachof the items considered or approved. This will enable residents to clearly see theassociated monthly cost per resident for each item proposed or approved. As well, I willask that these items be categorized in terms of how and why they were prioritized on thelist.Subsequently, each budget request that comes before the Board of Selectmen duringthe course of the year should be added to this list, and made publicly available on thetown website, along with the item’s projected tax levy. This will enable residents to makemore informed judgments about the use of taxpayer dollars.All too often individual requests are acted upon as completely separate entities with littleconnectivity to their impact on the overall taxpayer debt. This frequently results inrequests being approved because of what appears to be an insignificant tax increaseassociated with a particular item. Sadly, as each of these requests add up, the burdenon Sturbridge taxpayers increases, resulting in diminished discretionary income for someand a loss of obligated income for others. This serves only to the detriment of residents.
•
This spreadsheet will include, yet not be limited to, the following items and theirsubsequent tax impact upon residents:
o
WWTF
o
Town Hall/Center School Renovations
Alternate site locations for the Town Hall
o
Burgess Elementary School Renovation/Reconstruction Project
o
Sturbridge Landfill/Recycling Center
o
Non-dedicated funds (i.e. Community Preservation Act) associated withthe purchase of land and/or capital expenditures.
o
Legal Fees and associated costs in relation to our contractualagreements with Kopelman and Paige as well as alternative agreementswith other acceptable prominent law firms.
In line with this request, I will seek a public accounting anddetailed explanation as to the process and rationale formaintaining our relationship with Kopelman and Paige asopposed to “market shopping”
o
Hamant Brook Dam Renovations/Maintenance vs. the StreamRestoration Project proposed by the State Division of Fisheries andWildlife.
o
A detailed report and tax levy estimate on the underground power lineproposal that the Town Administrator has indicated he will bring beforethe town for the 2010 Annual Town Meeting.
Add a Comment