• Embed Doc
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
Sir, I am sending in attachment rough( for sorry) translate of my story “Strategija andtactics of Army of the USA in war in Afghanistan and its influence on Central Asia”.This story has issued onhttp://www.soldatru.ru/read.php?id=138I would be glad if this story will be issued by you in co-author with some of youRegards OlegMy cell in Bosnia is +387 65 413651Oleg ValetskyStrategija and tactics of Army of the USA in war in Afghanistan and its influence onCentral AsiaModern war in Afghanistan is the important event for all world not only becauseAfghanistan became a point of the appendix of efforts of all block of NATO but also because it directly infringes on interests of region closely connected with Russia -Central Asia (and consequently, and interests of Russia). To understand, how this war can affect position in the world, it is necessary to estimate soberly first of allopportunities which the parties participating in it have. Certainly, main and definingforce in this war is the American army, doctrines and which opportunities are analysed by me in the book prepared for printing " the New weapon and new strategy ". Duringwars in Yugoslavia and Iraq the American military command has tested the newdoctrine of conducting operations on all territory of the enemy, and first of all on thecenters supervising its manufacture, the population, transport. The given concept has been developed by John Vordenom (John Warden) and taken on arms by the Supremecommand of the American army. Also by development of the given doctrine JohnBoyd's theories (John Boyd) about actions on an advancing of the opponent in thefield of acceptance and carrying out by it during a life of decisions that issimultaneously interfaced to actions on destruction of a circuit of command of theopponent and on the general scheduled demoralization of the enemy were used.Creation of new systems of the operated weapon has increased opportunities of  NATO. It has allowed groups in some person or even to singles to amaze any purposes on all rear of the enemy. Not casually in military-political circles of the USAnot time were put forward offers on reduction of a land forces and formation of asmall contingent, sufficient for perebroski by air in any point of the world. As a matter of fact, such contingent would be motorizirovannoj the infantry equippedlegkobronirovannoj by technics. Its main problem would consist in maintenance of effective application of systems of the operated weapon in cooperation with localallies. Development of the borrowed territories there will be messages the aeromobilearmies equipped legkobronirovannoj by technics and leaning fire power of áÓÔ¿½½ÑÓ¿®ß¬«-rocket and aviation systems of the weapon. Naturally, similar offers caused also negative responses in the environment of the American Supremecommand, however the success of operation in Yugoslavia has served as convincingargument for vysheupomjanutoj to reorganization of armed forces of the USA andtheir allies. Acknowledgement of it became reduction of parts of a land forces of thecountries - members of the NATO, at all not connected with absence of money for themaintenance of army. New samples of the cassette and operated weapon applied asaircraft so artillery and rocket complexes, have absolutely changed a course of military actions. As to army of the USA, it also undergoes the serious changes caused by its reduction, and also refusal from heavy bronetehniki (including alreadydeveloped SAU Crusader), perebroska which demands too many forces and means.
 
Already during war in Iraq command of the American army has created brigadesunder the name "striker" (shock), equipped wheel bronetehnikoj - armored troop-carrier LAV-25, and the machines of fighting and rear support created on its base.Actually they became a ground equivalent of sea infantry, air-landing and air-assault parts of the American army.Alongside with the last shock brigades were ready to fast perebroske in any point of the world. Thus it is important, that ognevaja support of "forwarding" forces was based on application of the operated and cassette weapon. The American militarycommand has been so assured of the superiority that has considered possible to putthis theory into practice. In particular, it concerns the theory " wars in three quarters ",the sea infantry developed by was ordering case general Charles Krulakom.According to it at that time while in one quarter sea infantrymen conduct operations,in the second they can conduct "zachistku" territories, and in the third to distribute thehumanitarian help. Similar strategy has been issued in June, 2001 in strategic doctrineFM1 " The Army ", and also in the charter of operations FM-5 "Operations".Practically given strategy has been focused on creation of the small armed forcesequipped by modern systems of the operated weapon, and also means of investigationand radio-electronic struggle. These forces could conduct independently without long preparation operations in any point of a planet by means of local allies. Thus themachinery of state would not spend traditional measures on translation of ability tolive of the countries into the martial law. However already in Iraq it was found out,that at war against "ideological" Islamic the guerrilla-mojaheds installation ondisorganization of an enemy sheaf " Supervision - orientation - the decision - action "John Boyd simply does not work by virtue of absence for the opponent of thecommand centers traditional for the civilized world. It is indicative, that there aremore than problems the American armies had in struggle against the local Islamicguerrillas-mojaheds, managed to choose more rational method of struggle, thanfrontal attacks. Afghanistan long time was a place rather quiet, and fights wereconducted here mainly by the field commanders who have supported new westernizedgovernment Hamida Karzaja.Using so powerful factor as Islamic fundamentalism at growing discontent of the population with requisitions and robberies of field commanders, talibs have managedin 2005 sharply to make active actions. Americans were not able to supervise the processes occuring inside of the Afghani society and by that have broken owndoctrine, having broken off a sheaf " supervision - orientation - the decision - action ".It has enabled talibs to finish free with the opponents inside of the Afghani society.The last was the purpose and mojaheds in Iraq, and struggle against foreignoccupation became only a pretext for simplification "zachistok" opponents of Islamicrevolution who in this case could be killed any more as "devout" and as traitors of anislam and helpers of invaders. It is quite coordinated with the Islamic lawscondemning those who breaks the law in the Islamic state, but those justifying murder who, breaking laws of an islam service "incorrect", itself it appears the turncoat. As amatter of fact, any revolution is directed not against enemies external, and againstenemies internal. That of mojaheds destruction of the opponents in own environmentmore interested, and to them as well as possible send slogans of struggle withinostranoj okkupatsiii, accessible and clear all. As strano, the American command hasnot considered so important factor. Practically Americans had no thought over strategy for struggle against guerrillas neither in Iraq, nor in Afghanistan
 
At all not having strategy, command ISAF could achieve the best results, usingchecked up tactics of creation of blockhouses and paying attention to preparation of new efficient divisions of special troops of the Afghani army and active actions onsearch and destruction of forces of talibs and "al-¬á¿ñÙ". However in practicecommanders of various contingents much division preferred to sit out on bases or tospend operations obviously senseless, to avoid losses in the numbers. Forces of theAmerican special troops, not having support from local and rather raznosherstnojarmies Karzaja, were not able to fix successes of the aircraft, and finally began to getin ambushes. In 2005 the special troops of the American Naval Forces have lost 16fighters was onboard helicopter MH-47, brought down by talibs by means of PZRK on border with Pakistan. PZRK were bought by representatives "al-¬á¿ñÙ" - quiteoften free - in the same Yugoslavia (for example, to Sarajevo), or in the next Pakistanat the price of 2-3 thousand dollars for a rocket and 5-10 thousand for a complex. Asthe last are made not only in the USA, the Great Britain, Sweden, France, Russia, butalso in China, Iran, Egypt hardly it is possible to prevent occurrence of this weapon intalibs in the increasing quantity. For such highland as Afghanistan, it means, thatforces ISAF will lose the mobility provided helicopters - that roads of Afghanistanhardly can favour to similar mobility in the foreseeable future. Owing to creation of network "al-¬á¿ñÙ" talibs had an opportunity to receive the new staff of the preparedexperts not only from Islamic, but also the European countries, and also from theformer USSR.In 2005 the death-roll in attacks of talibs has increased up to 1500 thousand person,and about hundred of them military men ISAF made. Growth of a death-roll in theranks of ISAF is officially recognized on a site http: // www.icasualties.org/oef/,namely: in 2003 - 57 victims, in 2004 - 58 victims, in 2005 - 130 victims, and in 2006already 172 victims. Growth of number of losses in a multinational contingent of  NATO also will lower mobility of armies ISAF as their commanders are more anxious by reaction to growth of losses in staffs of their own armies, rather than that this or that operation is finished neuspeshno. That talibs finally will receive long-awaitedfreedom of hands and, having finished with the enemies in pushtunskoj to theenvironment of Afghanistan, will continue the business in the next Pakistan. Pakistan became the first victim of new talib revolt as a coalition of Islamic parties from thevery beginning of war in Afghanistan, has supported talibs, as well as a part of officers of army and special services. At the same time in the real policy the fact of  possible creeping Islamic revolution in the next region of Central Asia isunderestimated. The institute of the analysis of a world policy of the USA has published analytical research " Strategic paradigms - 2025 " in which, in particular, itis spoken: " By 2025 probability of that Central Asia can turn to similarity of modernAfghanistan, will be rather real. The moderate states can disappear in general from acard of this region ". This region on the potential to the little concedes to Pakistan. Itsterritory makes over 3 million square kilometers, and the population is totaled 59,4million by person (according to " the World directory of CIA " for 2005) . From themin Kazakhstan lives 15,2 million; in Kyrgyzstan - 5,1 million; in Tajikistan - 7,2million; in Turkmenii - 5 million; in Uzbekistan - 26,9 million person. The totalinternal product has made 232,4 billion dollars in 2005; gross national product per capita makes approximately 3 900 dollars. Gross national product is distributed asfollows: Kazakhstan - 132,7 billion dollars; Kyrgyzstan - 9,3 billion dollars; Tajikistan- 8,8 billion dollars; Turkmenija - 29,4 billion dollars; Uzbekistan - 52,2 billiondollars. The bridge connecting Afghanistan with this region, nationalities of the north
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...