Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
The Return of Tapandole El Ojo Al Macho

The Return of Tapandole El Ojo Al Macho

Ratings: (0)|Views: 22|Likes:
Published by Editor

More info:

Published by: Editor on Mar 27, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





The Return of "Tapandole el Ojo al Macho"The Editor: A few weeks ago, the Editor reported on realestate matters that involved National LULAC and twoproperties that LULAC owns that are known as KingsvilleLULAC Manor Apartments in Kingsville, Texas andLULAC Hacienda Senior Apartments.
The Editor will write a series of articles on the Haciendaproperty in the next few days. Margaret Moran, theNational President of National LULAC, sold the Haciendaproperty to a third party last year.
The question for the National LULAC Board and for thethousands of LULAC members is how much did the thirdparty purchaser of the Hacienda property pay for theproperty? How much did the purchaser pay to personsother than LULAC to acquire the property. Did anymembers of the National LULAC Board receive money,either directly or indirectly from the proceeds of thetransaction? Did any attorneys who represent LULACplay at both ends of the purchase - seller deal that wouldbe considered a conflict of legal ethics for the Texas StateBar to review. Questions for the National LULAC Boardinclude resolutions in the LULAC minutes that authorizedMargaret Moran to sell the Hacienda property? Did theLULAC National Board have a full discussion of the sell ofthe Hacienda property, the appraised value of theproperty, the potential for the property to make money forLULAC? A fuller question for the National LULAC Boardwould be "did the board members exercise due diligencein any decision that they might have made regarding the
sale of the Hacienda property?" The Hacienda was aproperty of the members of LULAC. The duty of theNational LULAC Board to the members is a fiduciary dutyto protect the property of LULAC. Did the NationalLULAC Board breach its fiduciary duty to the LULACmembers in protecting property of the organization?
The amount of money that is involved in this transactionwill be shocking numbers for LULAC members and thepublic.
At the last National LULAC Board meeting that NationalLULAC had in February 2013, the beleaguered NationalBoard members got into a discussion regarding suing theEditor, me, the writer of this blog. There was never anyspecific reason for the lawsuit other than some membersof the National LULAC Board do not like the Editor.Without laying out the specific reasons to sue the Editor,one of the National LULAC Board pendejos who serves asthe Vice President of Southeast, boriqua of course, madea motion to sue the Editor, that's what they call the Editoron the National LULAC Board, to which there was animmediate second by a family member of the pendejomotion maker. The Board got into a heated discussionregarding the motion, more LULAC money to be in courthaving to drag the Board all over the country and apossible counter suit by the Editor. The word back to theEditor that as the vote was being taken that Rosa "laSanta" Rosales raised her skinny arms, pumping them inthe air, yelling out, "sue the Editor." The vote to sue theEditor passed with 5 votes voting against or abstaining.To those who voted No to "sue the Editor," the Editor

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->