at
9:30
a.m. in the forenoon
of
that day or
as
soon thereafier as counsel can beheard, why
an
order should not be entered herein:
1)
Compelling compliance with the Rent Stabilization Code
of
New
York
and mandating renewal leases to Petitioners;
2)
Enjoining Respondent, New
York
State Division
of
Housing
and
Community Renewal
(“DHCR”)
from administering, enforcing or in
any
mannerapplying the provisions of the High Income Rent Deregulation Statute
of
the State
of New
York,
Section 2520.1 1 against Petitioners;
3)
Issuing a Preliminary Injunction enjoining and restraining
the
Respondents, Tishman Speyer Properties,
L.P.
and PCV
ST
Owner
LP
fromprosecuting any eviction proceedings to terminate Petitioners’ occupancy duringthe pendency of this proceeding or the related proceeding, Roberts, et al.
v.
Tishman Speyer Properties,
L.P.,
Index
No.
100956/07;
and
4)
Granting such
other
and
further
relief
as
the Court deems just andproper including class certification for petitioners, legal fees and costs.
ORDERED
that personal service
of
this order to show cause and the papers
upon
which it is granted and the Verified Petition be made upon defendants or theirattorneys on
or
before
be
deemed sufficient service.
ENTER:
2
J.S.C.
Supreme Court Records OnLine Library - page 2 of 23
Leave a Comment