A
NTI
S
HYSTER
Volume 8, No. 2 www.antishyster.com
39
missed as largely irrelevant.But Mr. Burien goes further – heclaims the dual system of books wasnot unique to New Jersey, but also com-mon among
all
fifty states. Moreover,he claims t
he dual accounting system wasnot only used ten years ago, but is stillbeing used
today
.
For example: “In 1987 Arizona’sannual Service Budget reported $2.8billion in revenues but the state’s 1987CAFR reported total cash receipts of $3.1 billion – a mere $300 million dif-ference.”“However, in 1997, Arizona re-ported an Annual Service Budget of $5.5 billion while the State’s CAFR(printed by the Auditor Generals Office)showed Total Gross Cash Receipts of
$17 billion
. That’s a difference of over
$11 billion
. In just ten years, Arizonahad caught up to New Jersey in that bothstates’ Annual Budgets reported lessthan one-third of the actual gross in-come seen in the states’ CAFRs.”“CAFR reports indicate that thecomposite totals for all government(Federal, state, county and city) own-ership of publicly traded stock exceeds$32 TRILLION (
53%
of the total own-ership of all listed stocks), $8 TRIL-LION in insurance company equity(should we be surprised by high pricedmandatory auto insurance orunaffordable health care?), and $5TRILLION in Bond Surety Escrow Ac-counts for
future
liability of existing orpotential debt.Governments use Bond SuretyEscrow Accounts to evade that peskylittle rule that government should notoperate at a “profit”. That is, govern-ment should not impose more taxes thanit actually uses to run the government.By designating tax revenue that exceedsoperating costs as “Bond Surety Es-crow” for
future
liability, governmentavoids calling excess revenue a “profit”and is thereby enabled to continue en-riching itself at public expense.
Ask not for whom the road tolls
To illustrate the potential forabusing “future liability payments”,consider the New Jersey’s plan in the1950s to build the New Jersey StateTurnpike and Garden State ParkwayAuthorities. The state asked voters toapprove a $7.5 billion bond to constructthe turnpikes. The state explained thatthese turnpikes would be operated astoll roads by the bondholders until the$7.5 billion bond was paid off – but thebondholders could not operate the tollroads at a profit. Once the bonds wererepaid, the turnpikes would revert back into the state’s Annual Budget as a nor-mal cost/revenue item. The public votedYes.Over the following years, thestate sometimes alleged that the toll rev-enue from operating those turnpikesfailed to cover their operating expenses,and so additional bonds were passed tofund the turnpikes. As a result, in 1990,the total bond liability still owed for theturnpike had grown to $14.5 billion. Butguess how much was in the Bond SuretyEscrow Accounts?
$38 billion!
Enough to repay the original $7.5 bil-lion bonds almost four times.How could that happen? Say thetoll road made a $400 million profit forthe year and the scheduled payment onthe $7.5 billion bond was $100 million.The state made the $100 million bondpayment but kept the extra $300 mil-lion in a Bond Surety Escrow Accountfor “future liability payments.” Al-though they kept the $300 million, theydid not declare it as an
asset
but wroteit off as a line-item
payment
. In otheryears, even though they made a profit,they’d allege that they lost money andtherefore floated more billions in bonds.The bottom line is that New Jer-sey is collecting hundreds of billions of virtually unreported dollars from all theautonomous agencies. The motivatingfactor is not public welfare, but controlof those billions.Mr. Burien not only alleges thatthe dual accounting system exemplifiedby CAFR is used by all fifty states, butalso by all counties, cities, and the Fed-eral Government itself. If Mr. Burien’sallegations are correct, they comprisethe most damning indictment of biggovernment yet seen. In sum, Mr.Burien implies that our government isin fact a
criminal enterprise
bent on op-pressing Americans by extorting sev-eral times as much tax revenue as itspends on public services and using themajority of those extorted revenues toenrich, empower and enlarge govern-ment at public expense.
Do You Want Effective Privacy???
There’s no privacy when you receive mail at home. There’s also noprivacy when you have a post office box or private mail drop (i.e. MailBoxes Etc.) because the government requires that you provide your “resi-dence address,” identification, and even a social security number!
WE HAVE THE SOLUTION:
Join the Free Speech Literary Society, A Trust, and for just$150 per year you can enjoy all the benefits of membership — in-cluding use of our Nevada address for remailing. For more informa-tion, please send a self-addressed, stamped 9 x 12 envelope to:
Free Speech Literary Society, PSC3885
South Decatur, suite 3010,Las Vegas, Nevada [89103]. 1-800-945-2981
Please help keep our costs down – write for our free brochure before youcall. When you write, we will also send you information on obtainingforeign passports, second Citizenships, alternative venues for vehicle reg-istration, private phone lines, opening bank accounts without social se-curity numbers (we can actually do this for you - not a mere theory!), aswell as our general corporate, trust, and partner ship services.
Leave a Comment