Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Supreme Court United States v. Windsor/Defense of Marriage Act Transcript

Supreme Court United States v. Windsor/Defense of Marriage Act Transcript

Ratings: (0)|Views: 155|Likes:
Published by Rod McCullom
Transcripts of oral arguments in the Supreme Court's hearing of United States v. Windsor to decide Section Three of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) on March 27 2013. This is the Supreme Court's second hearing an equal marriage case. The first was the Prop 8 case on March 26 2013.
Transcripts of oral arguments in the Supreme Court's hearing of United States v. Windsor to decide Section Three of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) on March 27 2013. This is the Supreme Court's second hearing an equal marriage case. The first was the Prop 8 case on March 26 2013.

More info:

Published by: Rod McCullom on Mar 28, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

03/28/2013

pdf

text

original

 
 
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425
Official - Subject to Final Review
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - xUNITED STATES, :Petitioner : No. 12-307v. :EDITH SCHLAIN WINDSOR, IN HER :CAPACITY AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE:OF THEA CLARA SPYER, ET AL. :- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - xWashington, D.C.Wednesday, March 27, 2013The above-entitled matter came on for oralargument before the Supreme Court of the United Statesat 10:18 a.m.APPEARANCES:VICKI C. JACKSON, ESQ., Cambridge, Massachusetts; forCourt-appointed amicus curiae.SRI SRINIVASAN, ESQ., Deputy Solicitor General,Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.; forPetitioner, supporting affirmance.PAUL D. CLEMENT, ESQ., Washington, D.C.; for RespondentBipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United StatesHouse of Representatives.DONALD B. VERRILLI, JR., ESQ., Solicitor General,1
Alderson Reporting Company
 
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425
Official - Subject to Final Review
Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.; forPetitioner, supporting affirmance.ROBERTA A. KAPLAN, ESQ., New York, New York; forRespondent Windsor.2
Alderson Reporting Company
 
 
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425
Official - Subject to Final Review
C O N T E N T S
ORAL ARGUMENT OF PAGEVICKI C. JACKSON, ESQ.For Court-appointed amicus curiae 5ORAL ARGUMENT OFSRI SRINIVASAN, ESQ.For Petitioner, supporting affirmance 18ORAL ARGUMENT OFPAUL D. CLEMENT, ESQ.For Respondent Bipartisan Legal AdvisoryGroup of the United States House ofRepresentatives 35REBUTTAL ARGUMENT OFVICKI C. JACKSON, ESQ.For Court-appointed amicus curiae 503
Alderson Reporting Company

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->