Amended Complaint Obama- 312345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728
ere in Article 1 of the Constitution is a citizen granted the rightto access the private medical, school, tax, or personnel records of another citizen, and nowhere in
Article 1 is a citizen granted the power of Congress to make such inquires.”
This Court seems to make light of the importance of Article I to the federal constitution.That is the part of the federal constitution where
We the People
are represented in Congress andas such, an individual can initiate a Congressional inquiry if Barack Obama has committed an actof fraud.
Think of a Congressional inquiry as a really big recall effort started by one person.
Does the Plaintiff Have a Right to Know What is in the College Records of thePresident
It was our past president Thomas Jefferson who said:
An informed citizenry is the onlytrue repository of the public will.
The Plaintiff before filing his complaint, looked at both sides of the natural born citizenarguments and weeded out the illogical and faulty arguments on both sides.The Plaintiff also informed this Court in the past and now in the present about the caseagainst U.S. Senate Candidate Joe Miller and as such, the Plaintiff crafted his complaint in thesame manner as the
.The outcome from the
case against Joe Miller is: “
I hold that although Mr. Miller has alegitimate expectation of privacy in those documents, Mr. Miller's right to privacy is indeedoutweighed by the public's significant interest in the background of a public figure that is
running for the U.S. Senate.”
So the Plaintiff asks a rhetorical question; can this Court point to the cognizable injury tothe
and the compelling evidence in the complaint?