• Embed Doc
  • Copy Link
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
INTHESUPREMECOURTOFTHE
STATE
OFCALIFORNIAVARDUIROSEBARSAMYAN,
Petitioner,
Vl
)S-148712
)
)2dDist.No.B188695
)
)(LASCNo.BS099858;)TrialCt.No.5WL01545)APPELLATEDIVISIONOFTHE)SUPERIORCOURTOFTHESTATEOF)CALIFORNIAFORTHECOUNTYOF)LOSANGELES,Respondent,PEOPLEOFTHESTATEOFCALIFORNIA,)
)
RealPartyinInterest.)
)
$UPREtVIT.OURT
FILED
AU6
_
]
ZOO8
Frecletl_kI(.
Ohric:._
Clerk
PETITIONFORREHEARING
MICHAELP.JUDGE,PUBLICDEFENDEROFLOSANGELESCOUNTY,CALIFORNIA
KarenNash,JohnHamiltonScott,(StateBarNo.58258)DeputyPublicDefenders
Appellate
Branch320
West
TempleStreet,Room590
LosAngeles,Califomia
90012
Telephone:(213)974-3050
Attorneys
forPetitioner
 
TOPICALINDEX
PETITIONER
FORREHEARING
ARGUMENTPa.__.q__
1-2
ITHIS
COURT
SHOULDCONFIRMTHATANATTORNEYISNOT"ENGAGED"UNTILSUCH
TIME
ASAMATTERISTRANSFERREDFROMAMASTERCALENDARTOATRIALCOURT2-5IITHE10-DAYPERIODFORCOMMENCEMENTOFTRIALBEGINSWHENCOUNSELISNOLONGERCONSENTINGTODELAYOFTRIAL5-7IllTHISCOURTSHOULDSPECIFYWHENANATTORNEYIS"ENGAGED"INADIRECT
CALENDAR
COURT7-10IVTHISCOURTSHOULDSTATEWHETHERITISDECIDINGIFTHEPROSECUTIONISENTITLEDTOUNJUSTIFIEDTRIALDELAY,ANDIFSO,SHOULDCONFORMTOTHESTATUTESANDRULESBYPROHIBITINGSUCHDELAY10-13VTHE"PERSONALOBJECTION"RULEOFJOHNSONTODELAYSWITHINTHE10-DAYPERIODSHOULDNOTBERETROACTIVELYAPPLIEDTOPETITIONER13-14CONCLUSION15-i-
 
ti
ilII
e
TABLEOFAUTHORITIESCITEDCases.Bailonv.AppellateDivision(2002)98Cal.App.4th1331B_v.SuperiorCourt(1986)186Cal.App.3d483Malengov.MunicipalCourt(1961)56
Cal.2d
813Peoplev.
Alvarez
(1989)
208
CaI.App.3d567Peo_p._eg___le.Henderson(2004)115Cal.App.4th922v.Johnson(1980)26Cal.3d557Peo___.e_o_le.SuperiorCourt(Lavi)(1993)4Cal.4th1164Rhinehartv.(1984)35Cal.3d772
Townsend
v.
i._,_2.9.
E_E
J_
(1975)15Cal.App.3d774
Statutes
PenalCode
§1050
§
1050,subd.(e)
§
1382
Pa_a
11
1212
11
11131,5,6,72,101110,11
-ii-
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...