Upload_transparent

The Housing Crash Recession and the Case for a Third Stimulus

 
 
 
 
 
cepr

by cepr

Value This
Doc
Scribd
Average
     
Pages: 21 43
Words: 7388 13640
Characters: 44927 81678
Lines: 244 623
     
     
Letters per word: 6.08 5.99
Words per line: 30.28 21.89
Words per page: 351.81 317.21

Add to your reading list

Flag_red Flag this document

Document Information

887 Reads | 2 Comments

Description

This paper makes the case for a third stimulus package to in the face of economic indicators signaling that the economy is in a deeper downturn than was expected based on previous projections. Specifically, the report calls for an employer tax-credit for extending health care coverage and another per worker employer tax credit for increasing paid time off from work. The author also makes the case for a housing policy centered on the stabilization of prices in non-bubble and deflated markets rather than applying the same efforts on markets that remain at bubble inflated levels. Finally, the paper argues that the dollar must be allowed to fall in order to adjust trade imbalances that are compounding the U.S. economic crisis caused by the collapse of the housing market.

Pdf_16x16 21 Pages


Date Added

03/16/2009

Category
Tags
Groups
Copyright

Attribution Non-commercial

More info »

 

or use Facebook Connect

LafayetteEnFrance

LafayetteEnFrance

The comments in this paper regarding lowering the dollar exchange rate are tendentious and tantamount to "beggar-thy-neighbor" policies. The dollar has fallen far enough to favor export trade. Lowering the American dollar translates quite simply to increasing the cost of foreign goods and therefore enhancing market share in international trade and commerce. Which results, ipso facto, in creating unemployment in our trading partner nations. How is that equitable or fair, that the solution of America's unemployment problem should depend upon creating unemployment amongst our trading partners? This is mindless nonsense and a perverse sort of "protectionism". Rather, the US should find a way to curb its appetite for cheap Chinese goods, thereby reducing its chronic deficit and its balance of payments that has lead to the more than a half a trillion dollars carried by the Chinese in T-notes. This debt requires maintenance, thus draining from Tax Revenues that could be better employed elsewhere in stimulating the economy. Americans cannot have their cake AND eat it. The binging is over. It is the time for difficult choices and their resulting consequences in diminishing somewhat the American standard of living that has, for far too long, depended upon debt.

03/20/2009