"Wars are very expensive. Wars take many many years of planning BEFORE they actually take place -
NOTHING is ever spontaneous" - Alan Watt
This is, NOTHING NEW UNDER THE SUN and the real facts of the day is that NOTHING happens
by chance!
This information is in relation to what we have been "indoctrinated" with and that is that we have been taught to "DEFEND" ourselves INSTEAD of "turning the other cheek".. Our "educators" understood VERY well why they taught us and wanted us to DEFEND ourselves, for the reasons stated below! "It is theDEFENDING thatCREATES the POWER. It's the "DEFENCE" which creates theFORCE. If you go in there (into court) with NO DEFENCE, there is NO FORCE. ACCEPTANCE IS THE
generally what gets everyone in prison (By Agreement) because 99.9% of people in prison are there of
their own FREE WILL,, they volunteered, when they ACCEPTED the PUBLIC CONTRACT and
didn\u2019t offer a PRIVATE CONTRACT for PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE.\u201d \u2013 Jack Smith.
the public is going to make the OFFERING and you\u2019re going to PRIVATELY ACCEPT it so that\u2019s the contract before the Tribunal or whether you\u2019re going to propose a PRIVATE CONTRACT and get the public to ACCEPT your PRIVATE CONTRACT because your private contract allowsSETOFF and
got to pay the penalty and that penalty is going to be extracted from you to do a discharge and so would you rather discharge it and be penalized by PUBLIC POLICY or would you rather use the PRE-PAID account by giving YOUR PRIVATE OFFERING and get the PUBLIC to accept it for SETOFF?\u201d\u2013
UNALIENABLE RIGHTS under a NATURAL (Creators) LAW areALTER ED andAMENDED by
YOUR CONTRACTS thatYOU make.\u201d \u2013 Jack Smith.
"All rights MUST be reserved!" when signing ANY contract!"
\u201cThe GUILTY theory is based on the LEGAL THEORY of CONTRACT LAW! You had/have a DUTY to
REBUT the PRESUMPTION OF EVIDENCE. You FAILED to rebut it so obviously there is NO REBUTTAL
so you are AGREEING you\u2019re guilty. \u201cWe don\u2019t need evidence as long as we have got your CONSENT,
agreement or contract.\u201d So you are found guilty BASED ON CONTRACT LAW. There is NO statute law, there
was no evidence, you are found guilty based on CONTRACT LAW which in Admiralty/Maritime is good
enough. It amounts to a CONFESSION in open court because YOU HAVE CONTRACTED THAT YOU\u2019RE
GUILTY. The reason you have contracted that you\u2019re guilty is because everybody in criminal law 101
understands that in Admiralty you\u2019re GUILTY unless YOU PROVE that your innocent and everybody further
understands that ALLEGATIONS by the prosecution or plaintiff in Admiralty, DO NOT have to be supported by
Affidavit or ANY evidence whatsoever.\u201d- Jack Smith.
\u201cWhat is PROFILING for especially when they (govt) are collecting DNA? PROFILING is really about
CONTROL. It is about IDENTIFYING who they believe are the COMPLIANT Global citizens. And who
are they concerned about as people who may RESIST. The other possibility of this and it is HIGHLY
suspect when they are collecting DNA. I believe that the top PRIORITY and mission of the one world
government movement is MASSIVE DEPOPULATION. It is the SCAM behind the environmentalist
movement. It is the SCAM behind global warming. They want to reduce the population by massive,
massive numbers.\u201d \u2013 Nancy Levant
\u201cWhen our DNA is now required to be Data Based, we realized that NOT ONLY are we PROFILED as
\u201cSocial Creatures\u201d, our educational levels, our health, our religions, our financial situations, our political
affiliations, we are now also PROFILED and DATABASED and stored basically to the molecular level.
Now what\u2019s that all about? WHAT IS PROFILING? From Infancy to eldership, every single thing that we
have done financially, politically, medically, socially and now our DNA now you have to make the
assumption that all of this Data Collection and storing of this information that there is an END, a purpose.
Why are they doing this? It\u2019s not just because they can. There are missions; there are intentions BEHIND
the profiling of the people of the world.\u201d \u2013 Nancy Levant
Leave a Comment