1°35
INTRODUCTIO
N
TO
ECCLESIASTI
CUS
)
INT
RODUCTIONTO
ECCLESIASTICUS
'-----.)
This
book
forms
part
of
the
Greek
Bible
tho
ughitdoes
notappear
intheJewish
Canon;
itistherefore
one
ofthe
deuterocano
nicalbooksacceptedby
the
Churc
h.
It
waswritteninHebrew;St
Jero
me
and
therabbis(who
quote
fromit)knewthebookinitsoriginallanguage.
About
two-thirds
of
thisHebrew
textwasdiscoveredin1896infragments
of
severallatemanuscripts;these
representarecensionwhichdiffersconsiderablyfromtheGreekandis
somewhat
corrupt.
TheChurchrecognisesthe
canonic
ityonly
of
theGreektext
and
fromthis
our
translationismade,
though
theHebrew
var
iantswillbefoundinthe
footnotes
.
The
Latin
titleEcclesiasticus
(tiber)
isrelativelyrecent(StCyprian);it
probab
lycalls
attent
iontothefact
that
the
Churc
h
adopted
itforherofficialusealthoughtheSynagoguedidnot.In
Gre
ek,cf.the
subscriptio
of51:30,the
book
wascalled'Wisdom
of
JesusBenSirach'andthe
author
isagainnamedin50:27.
Nowa
daysheisreferredtoasBenSiraorSiracides(followingthe
Greek
form:Sirach).Inaforeword,vv.1-34,theg
randson
oftheauthortellshowhe
trans
latedthe
book
whenhewentto
sett
leinEgyptinthe38thyear
of
KingEuergetes,v.27.This
can
onlybePtolemyVIIEuergetes(170-117B.C.),
and
the
date
corresponds
to132B.C.BenSirahimselfpres
umab
lylived
and
wroteaboutsixtyyearsbeforehis
grandso
n,therefore
about
190B.C.Apassage
in
thebook
confirmsthisdate:BenSira'seulogy
of
theHighPriestSimon,50:1-21,isbasedonpersonalreminiscence.
This
wasSimonII,whodied
shor
tly
aft
er200B.C.AtthisperiodPalestinehadjustcomeunderthedominion
of
theSeleucids
(198).Hellenisation,thatistosaythei
mitati
on
of
Greekm
ann
ers,wassupportedbyasection
of
therulingclass;andsoonafterwardsAntiochus
Epiphanes(175-163)wastoattempttoimposeitbyforce.Againstthese
dangerousinnovationsBenSiramarshalsalltheforces
of
tradition.Heis
ascribeinwhomthe
pur
suit
of
wisdomisc
oupled
withzealfortheLaw.Heis
devotedtotheTemplewithitsliturgyandhasahighregardforthepriestly
office;
but
thesacredbooks,
too,
arehisspiritualnourishm
ent;
hehas
stud
iedthe
Prop
hetsand
abo
veallthewisdomwritings.Heinhisturn
underta
kestoteachwisdomtoallwho
are
eagerforit,33:18;50:27,cf.thetransla
tor'
sprologue,vv.7-14.Inform,thebookresemblesitspredecessorsandmodels.
Apar
tfromthe
sectionhymningtheglory
of
God
innature,42:15
-43:
33,
and
inhistory,
44:1-50:29,withtheappendicesof,respectively,ahymnofthanksgiving,
51:1-12,andapoemonthequestforwisdom,51:13-30,thebookisno
more
logicallyputtogethert
han
ProverbsorEcclesiastes.
The
mostdiversetopics
aredealtwith,innoorder
and
withsomerepetit
ion;
thetopicsarepresentedinsmall
groups
of
loosely
connect
edmaxims.Thedoctrine,
too,
istraditional.Thewi
sdom
whichBenSira
commend
s
come
sfromGod:itis
root
edinthefear
of
the
Lord
:itf
orm
sthey
outhful
characterandbringshappiness.Onhumandestiny
and
theproblem
of
retri
but
ionBenSirasharesthesameuncertaintyas
Job
andEcclesiastes.He
believesinretribution,heisawareofthetragic
importanc
eoftheh
our
ofdeath,buthedoes
not
yetseehow
God
canrewardeverymanashisactivities
deserve,cf.
Introduction
toWisdomBooks.Onthenatureofdivinewisdom,
24:1-22,he
elaborate
sthenotionsofProverbs
andJob
,cf.IntroductiontoWi
sdom
Books.ButBenSira'soriginal
contr
ibutionistoidentifywisdomwiththeLaw
ofMoses,24:23-24(thewisdompoeminBaruch3:9
-4
:4doesthesame).
Unlikehispredecessors,heintegrateswisdomwiththeobservance
of
theLaw.Further,heidentifiesobservance
of
theLawwithapunctiliousperformance
ofreligiousduties,35:1-10;heisafirmsupporter
of
liturgicalworship.
Incontrastwithearliersages,BenSirameditatesonthehistoryofsalvation,
44:1-49:16.Hereviewsthegreatpersonalities
of
theOldTestamentfromEnoch
toNehemiah.Onthreeofthem,Solomon(eventhoughhewasthemodelof
sages),Rehoboam
and
Jero
boam,hisverdictisassevereasthatpassedby
deuteronomichistorians,andlikethemhecondemnsallthekings
enbloc
exceptDavid,HezekiahandJosiah.Buthedwellsprincipallyonthesaintlyfigures
oftheOldTestamentandonthew
ond
ersGodworkedthroughthem.Hetells
howGodmadeacoven
ant
with
Noa
h,Abr
aha
m,Jacob,Moses,
Aaron
,PhinehasandDavid,embracingthewholenationbutespeciallyensuringlasting
privilegestocertainfamilies,andthepriestlyfamiliesinparticular.
For
the
author
holdsthedeepestrespectforthepries
thood
:
Aaron
andPhinehastake
leadingplacesinhisgallery
of
ancestors,
and
hiseulogyconcludeswithal
ong
andenthusiastictributetoSimonthereigninghighpriest.Helooksbackon
the
dep
artedglorieswithacertainsadness,ashethinksofthepresent,
and
hepraysashethinksof
judge
sandprophets'thattheirbonesmayfloweragain
fromthe
tomb',
46:12;49:10,andthattheymayhavesuccessors.Hewroteon
theeve
of
theMaccabaeanrevolt;hemayperhapshavelivedtoseeitend
and
tothinkthathisprayerhadbeenheard.
Though
inthishistory
of
salvationBenSiragives
pro
minencetothedoctrine
of
thecovenant,itisfairly
correct
tosaythathedoesnotlookforwardto
amessianicdeliverance.
True,
inhis
prayer
of36:1-17hereminds
Godof
hispromises,begginghimto
take
pityonZionandreassemblethetribes
of
Jacob,
but
ifthisismessianismitisveryvague.
From
start
tofinishtheteaching
of
thesages,beingconcerned.withtheproblems
of
theindividual,remainsclearly
distinguishedfromthepreachingofthe
prop
hets,
though
sometimesriotfar
removed.BenSiraisthelast
canonic
alrepresentative
of
JewishwisdominPalestine.Heisanoutstandingexample
of
those
hasidim
(the
'de
vout')
of
Juda
ism,cf.IM2:42
+,
whowere
soon
todefendtheirfaithagainstthepersecutions
of
AntiochusEpiphanes,
and
preservelittleislandsoffaithinIsrael,inwhich
theteaching
of
Christ
cou
ldlater
takeroo
t.
Though
Ecclesiasticuswas
not
acceptedintotheHebrewCanon,itisfrequentiy
quoted
intherabbinicalwritings;intheNew
Testament,
theEpistle
of
St
James
borrows
many
expressionsfromit,anditis,nexttothePsalms,the
Old
Testament
book
mostfrequently
quoted
intheChristianliturgy.
o
w
Leave a Comment