Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Michael Hoffman - Who killed Jesus Christ - 2013 - pdf

Michael Hoffman - Who killed Jesus Christ - 2013 - pdf

Ratings: (0)|Views: 90|Likes:
Published by romulus13
Cine l-a omorat pe Iisus Hristos, o recapitulare a unor adevaruri ingropate in minciuni corect politice.
Cine l-a omorat pe Iisus Hristos, o recapitulare a unor adevaruri ingropate in minciuni corect politice.

More info:

Published by: romulus13 on Apr 01, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

06/28/2013

pdf

text

original

 
 Wednesday, March 27, 2013
Who Killed Jesus Christ?
By Michael HoffmanMaundy Thursday, 2013 www.revisionisthistory.orgModern people think they know the answer to the question, "Who killed Jesus Christ?" They answer as they have been indoctrinated: all of our sins killed Jesus generally, and the Romans inparticular were responsible. No other malefactors are specifically cited, except perhaps for afleeting mention of a generic class of leaders, the “Chief Priests,” and a vague tribe referred to as“the people."Our sins did indeed contribute to the anguish, torment and death which Jesus suffered, andPontius Pilate is a stand-in for every weak, compromising Lunchpail Joe and Retirement Harry throughout time who will only try to do the right thing if it doesn't cost them personally. Pilate's wife put a harbinger of spiritual doom in Pilate's ear, but the Jewish mob took the starch out of Pilate's spine when it served up a more immediate threat for him to contemplate: the wrath of Caesar.Pilate chose the friendship of his boss in Rome over friendship with the King of the Universe.How many times have we made an equally foolish choice -- of expedience over principle? Yes, we are all guilty of the death of Our Lord. Yet, when the account of the trial, torture and execution of the Son of God is reduced to only auniversal poster for human depravity in general, a truth at the heart of this sacred narrative isdenied. At this time of year sincere Christians endeavor to walk again in the footsteps of our Savior as heemerged from his 40 day fast to beg His Father in the Garden at Gethsemane to let the cup of an
 
excruciatingly painful and shameful immolation, pass by.In endeavoring to penetrate as deeply as we can the mystery of the death of Jesus, it is necessary that all the factors in his murder are considered and encountered. It is a denial of the Cross toslink away from the truth as did all but two of the followers of Jesus on the Day of HisCrucifixion. We cannot content ourselves, out of fear and political correctness, with referring to those whoconspired to kill Him, in bland generic terms as "the Chief Priests and the People.”In the case of Judas, New Age gnostics paint him as a a misunderstood anti-hero who madepossible the divine atonement by bringing about the inevitable Sacrifice that opened the gates of heaven. Without Judas, they say, Christ could not have fulfilled His mission. This assertion ispresented to Gnostic initiates as a specially insightful esoteric revelation.But it ignores the plain meaning of Jesus words: "Woe unto the world because of offenses! For itmust needs be that offenses come; but woe to that man by whom the offense come! (Matthew 18:7).Judas was not freed from the consequences of his betrayal by some occult notion of him servingas a righteous instrument of the inevitable. Some sinner was going to offend God and betray HisSon. It tuned out that that someone was Judas Iscariot. Woe unto him, and to all who do as hedid.The religion of Judaism, when it became enamored of the oral traditions and superstitions of men, became the idol that blinded the Jewish leadership and then the people, to the fact thattheir Messiah had arrived and was in their midst. Initially, He had come only for them.
The Pharisees
 In the 1965 papal teaching "Nostra Aetate," it was declared, "...the Jewish authorities and those who followed their lead pressed for the death of Christ (John 19:6); still, what happened in Hispassion cannot be charged against all the Jews, without distinction, then alive, nor against theJews of today. Although the Church is the new people of God, the Jews should not be presentedas rejected or accursed by God, as if this followed from the Holy Scriptures."True, "it cannot be charged against all Jews." But as for the statement, "His passion cannot becharged against the Jews of today" this is without Biblical or patristic foundation. It is a hereticalfabrication.The Pharisees had the major instigating role in the murder of God's Divine Son. Those whoderive their spiritual patrimony from the Pharisees are today known as Orthodox Jews. Becauseof their
belief 
, and not because of their alleged racial descent, these modern-day Pharisees areindeed guilty of deicide. They would crucify Jesus again, if they could. How do we know this?The most revered of all rabbis in the history of the West is Moses Maimonides. He is admired by liberals and conservatives, the Left and the Right, and most significantly, by the Orthodox wingof Judaism, for whom he is the paradigm of a great sage and legal authority.
Rabbi Moses Maimonides
 In his tract,
 Avodat Kochavim
, Rabbi Maimonides issued a divine mandate to kill the "wicked"
 
Jesus Christ, as well as all Jews who follow Him, and all those who do not follow the Talmud.Maimonides wrote: "It is a
mitzvah
(religious duty highly pleasing to God), to destroy Jewishtraitors,
minim
(Christians), and
apikorsim
, and to cause them to descend to the pit of destruction, since they cause difficulty to the Jews and sway the people away from God, as didJesus of Nazareth and his students, and Tzadok, Baithos, and their students. May the name of the wicked rot.”The holy name of Jesus Christ, by which every knee shall bow, is cursed by Judaism’s mostesteemed, media-glorified rabbi, who dares to say of Him, "May the name of the wicked rot."(Maimonides’ allusion to "Tzadok and Baithos” and to
apikorsim
, refers to opponents of theTalmudic oral law).
The Talmud
 In the Babylonian Talmud (BT) Sanhedrin 43a we read:"On Passover Eve they hanged Jesus of Nazareth. And the herald went out before him for 40days and proclaimed, Jesus of Nazareth...practiced sorcery, incited and led Israel astray. Whoever knows of an argument that may be proposed in his favor should come and present thatargument on his behalf. But the judges did not find an argument in his favor, so they hangedhim on Passover Eve...Did Jesus of Nazareth deserve that a search be made for an argument inhis favor? Surely he incited others to idol worship..."BT Sanhedrin 107b:Jesus "went and set up a brick to symbolize an idol and bowed down to it...Anyone who sins andalso causes the community to sin is not permitted to do repentance. A Sage said: Jesusperformed magic and incited the people of Israel and led them astray."The famous passage from the Gospel of Matthew about the Jews agreeing that Christ's blood would be on them and their children has been used to justify racial hatred for anyone labeled a"Jew." This view is contrary to the New Testament, where race is only a determining issue forthe proud rabbinic enemies of Jesus, not for His followers.
The Blood Libel that is not a Libel
 The Gospel of Matthew has been indicted as the grounds by which countless "Jews" weremurdered in pogroms due to the "Blood Libel" (Judaic persons supposedly falsely accused of torturing and murdering Christian children). Tremendous advantage has been gained forZionism and Talmudism by the circulation of tales of bloodthirsty priests and Christian peasantsattacking and killing Judaic persons on trumped charges of "ritually" murdering gentile infantsand children.These archetypal tales of blamelessness and victimhood have an endless shelf life and arerecycled year after year in spite of the fact that the truth of the ritual murder accusation has beenconfirmed by no less a figure than Ariel Toaff, the son of the Chief Rabbi of Rome. Toaff isProfessor of Medieval History at Bar-Ilan University, outside Tel Aviv. He revealed the reality of Judaic ritual murder of Christians in his formidably researched masterwork,
 Pasque di Sangue
("Blood Passover”). He gives strong evidence that in some cases Ashkenazi "Jews" were indeed

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->