• Embed Doc
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
February 3, 2009mac TaylorLegislative Analyst
2009-10 Budget Analysis Series
Proposition 98Education Programs
 
ED-3LEgisLativE anaLyst’s OfficE2009-10 BuDgEt anaLysis sEriEs
exeCutive summary
The Governor’s 2009‑10 budget includes almost $55 billion in Proposition 98 undingor K‑12 education and the Caliornia Community Colleges (CCC). The budget reects majorreductions to school spending in 2008‑09 and 2009‑10. In this report, we outline ways or theLegislature to achieve budgetary savings while minimizing the adverse eects on core educa‑tional programs. In addition, we recommend that the Legislature use the state’s fscal crisis as anopportunity to rethink the state’s K‑14 educational ramework and undertake substantive reormin some key areas—categorical program unding, state mandates, and cash disbursements.
Governor’s Plan Balances K-14 Budget by Cutting K-12 General Purpose Funding.
Toachieve state savings, the Governor’s budget takes a deep cut to K‑12 revenue limits. (“Revenuelimits” reect general purpose unding that supports schools’ base academic program.) Aterproposing to cut K‑12 revenue limits roughly $2 billion in 2008‑09, the Governor’s budget or2009‑10 makes an additional cut o roughly $1 billion. Combined, these cuts represent roughly$3 billion in budget‑year solutions to help address the state’s huge shortall.
Recommend Making More Targeted Reductions.
Rather than cutting districts’ most exiblesource o unding, we recommend that the Legislature make targeted spending reductions. Be‑cause the level o education savings that the state will need to achieve in 2009‑10 is unknownat this time, we develop a three‑tiered approach to achieving Proposition 98 savings. Undereach tier, we make targeted reductions to specifc K‑14 categorical programs or block grants.Tier 1 reductions would provide this frst step o savings with little, i any, programmatic eect.In contrast, tier 3 reductions would have relatively signifcant programmatic eects on schools.Taken together, the tiers are intended to give the Legislature many options or achieving budget‑year solutions.
Opportunity for Categorical Program Reform
Governor’s Plan Suspends Most Categorical Program Requirements.
To help school dis‑tricts and community colleges respond to a tight budget, the administration proposes to perma‑nently suspend most categorical program requirements. This means districts would no longerneed to adhere to virtually any o the state’s existing program or reporting requirements. Inaddition, districts would be able to transer unds among categorical programs as well as romcategorical programs to general purpose accounts. Although additional exibility would beneftdistricts, we have concerns with the Governor’s approach o merely disregarding—rather thanreorming—the state’s categorical system.
Recommend Undertaking Substantive Categorical Reorm.
We recommend that theLegislature adopt a more strategic approach that provides districts with additional exibilitybut also simplifes, streamlines, and improves the existing system. Specifcally, we recommendconsolidating 42 existing K‑12 categorical programs into three large block grants ocused oninstructional support, at‑risk students, and special education students. The three block grantswould consolidate more than $10 billion, or roughly two‑thirds, o all state categorical und‑ing or K‑12 education. For CCC, we recommend consolidating eight programs into two block
LEgisLativE anaLyst’s OfficE2009-10 BuDgEt anaLysis sEriEs
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...