Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
6Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
13-04-02 Apple v. Samsung Case Management Order

13-04-02 Apple v. Samsung Case Management Order

Ratings:
(0)
|Views: 1,276|Likes:
Published by Florian Mueller
April 2, 2013 order on multiple case management issues by Judge Lucy Koh, United States District Court for the Northern District of California (case no. 11-cv-01846)
April 2, 2013 order on multiple case management issues by Judge Lucy Koh, United States District Court for the Northern District of California (case no. 11-cv-01846)

More info:

Categories:Types, Business/Law
Published by: Florian Mueller on Apr 03, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

01/17/2014

pdf

text

original

 
 1Case No. 11-CV-01846-LHK ORDER RE: APPLE
S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION SEEKING AN APRIL 3 CASE MANAGEMENTCONFERENCE; APPLE
S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION;
SAMSUNG’S
MOTION FOR ENTRY OF PARTIAL JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 54(B) AND FOR STAY
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728
   U  n   i   t  e   d   S   t  a   t  e  s   D   i  s   t  r   i  c   t   C  o  u  r   t
   F  o  r   t   h  e   N  o  r   t   h  e  r  n   D   i  s   t  r   i  c   t  o   f   C  a   l   i   f  o  r  n   i  a
 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIASAN JOSE DIVISIONAPPLE INC., a California corporation,Plaintiff and Counterdefendant,v.SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,a Korean corporation;SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,a New York corporation; andSAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONSAMERICA, LLC,a Delaware limited liability company,Defendants and Counterclaimants.)))))))))))))))Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK ORDER RE: APPLE
SADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONSEEKING AN APRIL 3 CASEMANAGEMENT CONFERENCE;APPLE
S MOTION FOR LEAVE TOFILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION;
SAMSUNG’S
MOTION FOR ENTRY OF PARTIALJUDGMENT PURSUANT TO RULE54(B) AND FOR STAY PENDINGAPPEALHaving considered the arguments of the parties and the papers submitted, the Court herebyrules as follows:(1)
 
The Court DENIES Apple’s Administrative Motion Seeking an April 3 Case Management
Conference, ECF No. 2283.(2)
 
The Cou
rt GRANTS Apple’s Unopposed Motion for Leave to File One
-Page ReplySupporting Its Administrative Motion Seeking an April 3 Case Management Conference,ECF No. 2287.(3)
 
Subject to the briefing schedule set forth below, t
he Court GRANTS Apple’s Motion for 
 Leave to File Motion for Reconsideration of Order Granting New Damages Trial on GalaxySII AT&T and Infuse 4G, ECF No. 2289.
Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document2299 Filed04/02/13 Page1 of 2

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->