Read without ads and support Scribd by becoming a Scribd Premium Reader.
 
RECONNECTING MINNESOTA
Conrad deFiebreTransportation Fellow
THE CASE FOR AN INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL SYSTEM
Mick ConlanGraduate Research FellowOctober 2008
 
Table of Contents___ 
Key Findings & Recommendations 2Introduction 3
The Benets of Fast Intercity Rail
5Minnesota Scene 7
Northern Lights Express 7High-Speed Rail to Chicago 8Little Crow 10I-35 Corridor 11Southeast Express 11Other Routes 12
Funding Prospects 13Reference List 14
1 Reconnecting Minnesota
 
Key Findings & Recommendations_____ 
Reconnecting Minnesota 2
Key Findings
• Modern, high-speed passenger rail service, long a transportaon staple in Europe and Asia, is aboutto blossom in the United States, with important implicaons for Minnesota. A new federal studydocuments rail’s benets of safety, energy conservaon, highway congeson relief, environmentalprotecon, economic development, emergency preparedness, mobility for the aging and globalcompeveness.• Congress has approved by veto-proof biparsan majories $13 billion over ve years for passengerrail iniaves. A planned high-speed route from Minneapolis to Duluth could be among the rst in linefor some of that money. A St. Paul-Chicago connecon is also a strong contender. Local and mulstateplanning and engineering for both are well underway.• Together, these two projects would bring Minnesota more than 15,000 jobs, $648 million in addedpersonal income, nearly $2 billion in enhanced property values and at least $1.2 billion to $2.3 billionin savings from reduced travel mes, congeson and polluon.• Minnesota’s costs for these projects – a total of between $700 million and $750 million, according tothe latest esmates – would be reduced to no more than $150 million in general obligaon bondingwith the help of 80 percent federal funding approved by Congress. Operaons, possibly by private-sector concessionaires, are projected to produce healthy prots.• Most of the progress toward high-speed rail in Minnesota has been achieved by a broad coalion of cies, counes and the Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe, who have taken the lead in nancing early planningfor a Duluth-Minneapolis link. With Gov . Tim Pawlenty’s recent vetoes of $6 million in bondingappropriaons for Minnesota passenger rail projects, state government support has lagged, especiallyin comparison to $80 million of bonding authority already on the books in Wisconsin.• Other rail links are being promoted by Minnesota ocials in places such as Albert Lea, Rochester andWillmar, but these proposals are lile beyond the talking stage.
Recommendaons
• President Bush, who previously sought to defund Amtrak and has threatened to veto the currentpassenger rail legislaon, should sign the bill into law.• Minnesota should step up its nancial commitment to both the Duluth and Chicago high-speed linksto ensure their prompt development once federal funding becomes a reality.• Proposals for other routes will need well-organized support and funding from city and countyocials and other prospecve beneciaries in order to compete for federal and state grants.
Search History:
Searching...
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
  • p.
  • More From This User

    Notes
    Load more