Nor did the Hasmonaeans reinstate the Zadokites: Jonathan Maccabee claimed the High Priestlyoffice for himself. It was possibly at this point that the sect which was to become the Communityof Qumran was first founded largely by zealous returners from Babylon disappointed by the turnof events. Josephus first mentions the Essenes in his description of the reign of JonathanMaccabaeus implying that they were founded then. However many Jews at this stage stillsupported Jonathan. He remained in conflict with the Seleucids throughout his reign and wouldhave been given the benefit of the doubt while he was engaged in throwing off the foreigner.Such regard would not have been shown to his brother, Simon Maccabaeus, whose son in lawkilled him and his eldest and youngest sons while they were drunk on a visit to Jericho. Anotherson, John Hyrcanus, escaped. Meanwhile the Seleucid king, Antiochus VII Sidetes, took thechance to reassert Greek authority. One Qumran document apparently alludes to
Joshua
6:26where a ”Cursed One” loses his eldest and youngest sons. In the
Habakkuk Peshar
we read thatthis priest ”…walked in the ways of drunkenness …but the cup of God’s wrath will swallow himup… ” Other Qumran
Testimonia
seem to identify this priest with Simon Maccabee. Why thendid the Qumran Community hate this man so much?Simon Maccabee (142-135 BC) was the first independent king of the Jewish free state , whoserule was considered by his followers as a golden age, though he chose not to be called kingmerely accepting the title ethnarch. The lack of religious principle behind the revolution becameimmediately clear. In 140 BC, Simon was proclaimed High Priest by the Great Assembly of Priests and Elders (Pharisees) and his position was to be ”forever,” which is to say inherited”until there should arise a faithful prophet (1 Maccabees 14:41).” The decree recognised its ownillegality by making it sound only temporary through the phrase about the prophet, but itremoved the Zadokites permanently from office in practice because the age of prophecy hadended—since it was mythical, it had never begun. Opposition was to be severely punished.The Hasidim cannot have accepted such a proclamation and must have been even more horrifiedwhen Simon allied himself with the Romans. Of course, the Romans were all the time beingdiplomatically astute and had used the Hasmonaean family of rebels to weaken the SyrianGreeks, in preparation for the Roman annexation soon to come.An American Jewish scholar, Lawrence Schiffman, believes that the Sadducees were theZadokites who lost control of the Temple when the Maccabees refused to return the HighPriesthood to them. Later some compromised accepting back their priestly positions but under anon-Zadokite High Priest. Others refused to compromise and joined the sectarians foundedearlier by a Zadokite New Covenanter, the Teacher of Righteousness, who had retreated with hisfollowers into the wilderness to lead ritually pure lives, observing the Law strictly and followingthe solar calendar. The Pharisees supported the Maccabees throughout.Simon was murdered and his son, John Hyrcanus (135-105 BC), had himself anointed as HighPriest and therefore ruler of the Jews. He attacked the Samaritan’s town of Shechem anddestroyed their temple on Mount Gerizim, he attacked the Idumaeans and forced them to becomeJews, setting up the prospect of having the Idumaean but Jewish king Herod a century later, andfinally he actually attacked the Greek city of Samaria, populated with descendants of