• Embed Doc
  • Copy Link
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
Billings Pain
&
Allergy Clinic
Dr
.
Charl
esVV B
ro
wn
Board
Certified
Chiropractic Neurologist
ResearchStudy: ComputerizedMyography,  ElectromagneticFieldsa
nd
the BioElectric Shield™ 
The BioElectric Shield™ was researched for effectiveness
in
a study "Computerized Myography, ElectromagneticFields
and the
BioElectric Shield". Computerized myography
is
the
computerized reading of muscle strength. Theuse of the computer to record muscle strength
to
the .2
pound
accuracy insures consistency, reproducibility andobjective quantification of
the
muscle strengths. This particular medical device, the Compufet,
is
used in hospitals
and
clinics all over
the
world.Research showed an average drop in muscle strength of 16.89% after a person sits in front of a computer
monitor
for only 5 minutes. Conversely, after
then
wearing
the
BioElectric Shield, still sitting
in
front of the computer mon-itor for
another
5 minutes, strength was improved by 44.16%.
All
25 subjects showed improved strength after wear-ing
the
Shield for
only
5 minutes. Of
the
25 research subjects,
21
even showed muscle strength beyond their origi-nal, initial reading (Prior to being weakened by
the
computer).This demonstrates
thatnot
only
does the Shield negate
much
(if
not
all, for
many
people) of
the
effects of electro-magnetiC radiation,
but
it additionally strengthens
the body beyond what
it would be
without
wearing
the
BioElectric Shield. The Shield consistently demonstrated this dramatic strengthening effect in
only
5 minutes.
When
some of
the
research subjects were tested one
hour
after wearing
the
Shield, all of
them
showed
an
even greaterincrease in strength, thus confirming
the
hypothesis
that the
Shield effectiveness increases
when
worn for severalhours rather
than
only
5 minutes.In summary,
the
BioElectric Shield, consistently shows it's ability to "shield"
the
wearer from the documented neg-ative effects of exposure to electromagnetic radiation.
Test
Re
sults:
Trial
1:
Baseline established. Trial
2:
Retested subject after 5
minutes
in
front of
computer. Trial
3:
Retested subject still
sitting
in
front of computer
after wearing Shield for
5
mi
nut
es. 
~
b
30
20l
20
j
~~_
15
E
B
23
.,
:~
~~~~)\.
 
\!
)
B
1 2 4
1234
12345
123
4
S
Timesees.Time sees. Time sees. Time
sees.
Sub.
1
Ibs. force
Difference
Sub.
2
Ibs.
force Difference
Sub.
3 lbs.
force
Difference
Sub.
4
Ibs.
force Difference
Trial
1:
20.01bs
Trial
1:
14.01bs
Trial
1:
11.11bs
Trial
1:
21.01bs
Trial
2:
16.0Ibs.
-20.0%
Trial
2:
12.0
Ibs.
-14.3%
Trial
2:
10.1
Ibs.
-9.0%
Trial
2:
18.8Ibs.
-10.5%
Trial
3
19.01bs.
+18.8%
Trial
3 18.0Ibs.
+50.0%
Trial
3
13.7Ibs.
+35.6%
Trial
3 22.0Ibs.
+17.0%
30,
F
10
6
~
5
E
3
0
~ ~ -
~6
~ ~ t
 
I
12
3
4
1
234
5
1
2 34
5
B
4
S
Time
sees.
Time
sees.
Time sees. Time
sees.
Sub. 5
Ibs.
force Difference
Sub.
6
Ibs.
forceDifference
Sub.
7
Ibs.
forceDifference
Sub.
8lbs. force Difference
Trial
1:
16.71bs
Trial
1:
23.01bs
Trial
1:
6.21bs
Trial
1:
18.5
Ibs
Trial
2:
17.6Ibs.
+5.4%Trial
2:
12.6Ibs.
-45.29'6
Trial
2:
4.81bs.
-22.6%Trial
2:
11.4
Ibs.
-38.4%Trial
3
20.11bs.
+14.2%Trial
3
16.21bs.
+28.6%
Trial
3 7.1lbs.
+47.9%Trial
321.0Ibs.
+84.2%
801
Grand
Av
enue
•Billi
ngs,
Mo
nt
an
a59102•USA•406.245.4877•FAX406
.2
45.8487
 
F
~~
 
~
E
L
B
123
4.
I
4.
S 
Time sees.
Time sees.
Time
sees.
Time
sees.
DifferenceSub.
10
Ibs.
force Difference
Sub.
11
lbs.
force DifferenceSub.
12
Ibs.
force DifferenceSub.
9
Ibs.
force
Trial
1:
IS.21bs 
Trial
1:
13.3
Ibs
Trial
1:
24.0
Ibs
Trial
1:
17.0Ibs 
Trial
2:
15.4lbs.
-9.4%
Trial
2:
12.4
Ibs.
-18.4%
Trial
2:
8.5
Ibs.
-36.1
%
Trial
2:
23.0
Ibs.
-4.2% 
Trial
317.9Ibs.
+16.2%
Trial
3
15.2
lbs.
+22.6%
Trial
3
13.S1bs. +58.8%
Trial3 27.5Ibs.
+19.6% 
F
:D-4L:J
~
2O...J
\ \
E 
J\ \
10
, '\ \ .
0
~B
:OJ
 
g 
I
1
2
3
4.
5
1 2
:3 4.
~
i
2 3
4
Time sees.
Time
sees.
Time
secs. 
Sub.
13
Ibs.
forceDifference 
Timesees.
Sub.
14
Ibs.
force DifferenceSub.
15
lbs.
force DifferenceSub.
16
Ibs.
force
Difference
Trial
1:
15.2
ibsTrial
1:
15.8
Ibs
Trial
1:
30.
Ibs 
Trial
2:
13.7Ibs.
-9.9% 
Trial
2:
12.8Ibs.
-19.0%
Trial
2:
28.0
Ibs.
-6.7% 
Trial
3 16.1Ibs.
+2S.8%Trial
3
31.5
Ibs.
+12.5%
Trial
3
15.7
Ibs.
+
14.6%
Sub. 17
Ibs.
forceDifferenceSub.
18
Ibs.
force Difference
SUb.
19
lbs.
force Difference
SUb.
20
lbs.
force Difference
Trial
1:
19.01bs
Triai
1.:
16.6
los
Trial
1:
14.7
Ibs
Trial
1:
1O.01bsTrial2:
12.4 lbs.
-15.6%
Trial
2:
8.6
Ibs.
-14.0%
Trial
2:
17.2Ibs.
-9.5%
Trial
2:
15.6
lbs.
·6.00Al
Trial
3 IS.9Ibs.
+28.2%
Trial
3
10.6
lbs.
+23.3% 
Trial
3
21.8
lbs.
+26.7%
Trial
3 17.0Ibs.
+9.0%
F:l~
:~~\
20
10
5
~:1:~
~~\.
15
g
1 2
:3 4.
~
1 Z
3
4.
Time
sees.
Sub.
21
Ibs.
force Difference
Sub.
22
\bs.
force DifferenceSub.
23
Ibs.
force
DifferenceSub.
24
Ibs.
force Difference
Trial
1:
16.6
Ibs
Trial
1:
17.8
lbs
Trial
1:
16.6
1bs
Trial
1:
11.8Ibs
Trial
2:
IS.4lbs.
-7.2%
Trial
2:
11.0
Ibs.
-38.2%
Trial 2:
IS.ZIbs.
-8.4%
Trial
2:
6.4
Ibs.
-45.8%
Trial
3 19.6Ibs.
+27.3%Trial
3
17.0
lbs. +54.5%
Trial
3 17.6Ibs.
+15.8%Trial
3 9Albs.
+46.9%Time sees.Time sees. 
Timesees.
Time
sees. 
Sub.
25
Ibs.
force Difference
Trial
1:
10.8
Ibs 
Trial
2:
8.8Ibs.
-18.5% 10.6
Ibs.
+20.5%
Summary
of
other
research Studies
done
with
the
BioElectric Shield™
Over
the
past
5
years,
more
than
12,000
people have
been
tested
using
traditionalapplied
kineseololm
a
finger
dynamometer, or
com
puterized
myography.
Approximately
98%
of this
group showed
a
decrease
in
muscle
strengthwhen
exposed
to 60hertz
frequencies
such
as
cell
phones, computers,
and
battery
operated
watches. Of
this
group
that
was
weakened,
99%
were
strengthened
when
a
Shield
was
worn.
Research was
conducted
by
Dr.
Charles
W.
Brown,
Dr.
Yvonne
Yurichko,
and
Virginia Bonta,
Occupational Therapist.
Additionally;
double
blind
studies
were
performed by
the 2
doctors to
rule
out
a
placebo
effect.
Of
the
SO
subjects tested,
none
were
strengthened
by
the
placebo,
and
all were
strengthened
by
the
Shield. The
initial
research
utilized
a
computerized
device
which recorded
50
different
acupuncture
pOints
representing
the
immune
system
and
all
the
major
body
organs.
After
wearing
the
Shield
for
one
month,
the
individuals
tested
showed
a
108%
to
400%
improvement
in
the
number
of
scores
which
fell
into the
"peak health"
range.
It
is
interesting
to
note
that
in
the
10
researchstudies
done
with
the
Shield
only
some
people
consciously
felt
substantially
different
wear
ing
a
Shield.
Most
of
us
are
unaware of
the
status
of
our
immune
system}
muscles
and
other
bodyfunctions,
but
our
research
tools
were able
to
detect
these
changes.
We
did
this
research
not
only
to
prove,
unquestionably,
the
power
of
the
Shield,
but
also
for
your
peaceof
mind.
We
know,
and now
you
know,
that
the
Shield
does
strengthen
and
protect
the
human
body.
More
than
12,000
people
have
proven
this!
So
when
you
purchase
a
Shield,
remember,
most
if
not
all,
the
"work'J
is
being
done
below
your
normal
level
of
consciousness.
You
can
wear it
withconfidence
thanks
to
the
modern
technology
that
has
shown
us
what it
can
do
for
you.
Trial
1:
l6.:
Q:J
/r~2\'
~
lO-lV'I/
,
\.
5-{
\ \
L
~
.
I ,
S
1 2 3
Time sees.
Time
sees.
Time sees.
1
F
~
L
~
' - - - - , - - - - ~ . . . . . . . . . , 
Trial
3
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...