• Embed Doc
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
Conlparison Test BioElectric Shield vs Teslar Watch
Elora Gabriel
Cundiyo
NM 87522
May
25,1994
BioElectric Shield
Company
PO
Box 107Lavina MT 59046Dear Friends,I have
been
researching the field
of
vibrational
energy
and
healing for some time. I am glad to see
that
there
is
increasing awareness
of
the
problems
relating to
electromagnetic
pollution. I believe
that
the
BioShield
is
one
of
the
finest
products
on the
market,
and
I
congratulate
you
on
this "wonderful pieceof technology.I am
working
as holistic
practitioner
in
the
field
of
bio-analysis, specializing
int
he field
of
environmental
toxicity. I have a large
and
very sophisticated
computerized
system called
the
MonroeHarmonic
Translation
System,
which
gives results
comparable
to (some say
more
accurate
than)
the
Vall
Dermatron.
[can
test clients for a wide range
of
sensitivity
and
toxicity using a
hair
sample.
The
hair sam pie gives a
com
plete
energetic
picture
of
the client's
body
and
subtle bodies.1
routinely
screen
clients
for
electromagneticpollution
as well as for toxicity
from
lead, mercury,
aluminum,
etc.
Many
people
are suffering from
this
condition,
news
that
will
not
surprise you. You
may
be
interested to
hear
of
an
experiment which
I
recently
didon
a
client who ordered
a BioSheild
upon
myrecommendation.
Let
me explain
that
my
system gives
both
Vitality
and
Toxicity (or Stress)readingsi these are
measured
on
a
numerical
scale,
and
the
Stress readings
should
not
be above 100;below 100
is
considered normal
range.My
client
was wearing a Teslar watch, so he was upset
when
his
EM
pollution
reading
came
in at 113.
Without the
watch, he
tested
at
132 (guite a
high
figure), so
it
was
helping,
but
clearly
not
enough.
He
then
ordered
a BioShield,
and
we
obtained the
following readings.
Wearing the watch
and
the
BioShield,
the
reading
dropped to
50,
but
withthe
BioShieid
alone,
his
reading
was 75-well Within
normal
range,
and
a
strong
indication
that,
for this
person
at
least,
your
product
is
far
more
effective
than
the
Teslar
Watch.
Client's Electromagnetic Pollution Scores
anything
over 100
is
too
high
Base
Score
»»»»»»>132
Score
with
Teslar
Watch
»»»»»>
113Score
with
Shield
and
Teslar
Watch
»»>50
Score
with
Shield
alone
»»»>75
I
think
you are
doing
great
work,
and
if
there's any
way we
can
help
each
other, let
me
know. I
enclosing some
literature
for
your
interest.Sincerely,Elora Gabriel
 
CHLORDANE
DIOXINS
DRUGS
ELECTROMAGNETIC
FORMALDEHYDE
GEOPATHIC STRESSHERBICIDES
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKELNITRATES
PESTICIDES
PETROCHEMICALSRADIATION
RADON
1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 0 
>
29
0 
»
57
0 
»
50
0
»»»
0 
»»>
116 
0 
»>
79
0 
»
54
0 
»>
66
0 
»
50
0 
»
50
0 
»
41
0 
>
38
0 
»>
66
0 
»>
72
0 
»
54
 
BIO -ENERGETIC ANALYSIS
05-21-1994
VITALITY INDEX
IMMUNE
SYSTEM
BRAIN
BONE
MARROW
NERVOUS
SYSTEM
LIVERKIDNEYS
COLON
LYMPHATIC
MUSCULAR
DEGENERATION
ENV
TOXICITY
ALUMINUM
ARSENIC
CADMIUM
1
«««««««««««««<
544 
20 1
«««««««««««
454 
2
»
47
1
««««««««««
416 
2
»>
69
1
«««««««««««««
529 
2
»»>
119 
1
««««««««««««<
516 
2
»»>
104 
1
«««««««««<
391 
2
»>
69
1
««««««««««
419 
2
»>
66
1
«««««««««
369 
2
»
47
1
«««««««««
366 
2
»>
79
1
««««««««««««
485 
2
»>
60
1 0 2
»»>
104 
1 0 2
»»>
119 
1 0 2
»
50
1 0 2
»»»>
141 
10 2
»»»
129 
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...