Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
10Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
EDCA ECF 115 2013-04-03 - Grinols v Electoral College - Taitz Opposition to Motion to Dismiss

EDCA ECF 115 2013-04-03 - Grinols v Electoral College - Taitz Opposition to Motion to Dismiss

Ratings: (0)|Views: 132|Likes:
Published by Jack Ryan
04/03/2013
115
OPPOSITION by James Grinols, Keith Judd, Thomas Gregory MacLeran, Edward Noonan, Robert Odden to 73 MOTION to DISMISS. (Taitz, Orly) (Entered: 04/03/2013)


04/03/2013
115
OPPOSITION by James Grinols, Keith Judd, Thomas Gregory MacLeran, Edward Noonan, Robert Odden to 73 MOTION to DISMISS. (Taitz, Orly) (Entered: 04/03/2013)


More info:

Categories:Types, Research
Published by: Jack Ryan on Apr 04, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

04/07/2013

pdf

text

original

 
Case 2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD Document 115 Filed 04/03/13 Page 1 of 20
Dr.
Orly
Taitz
ESQ
29839SantaMargarita,ste 100 Rancho Santa Margarita,CA92688CounselforPlaintif
fs
IN
T
HE US
DISTRI
CT
COURT
FO
RTHE EASTERN DI
ST
RICT OF CALIFORNIA
Grinols
et.al.,
PlaintiffS)
Case
#
12-02997
v
)
Hon
Morrison
C.
EnglandPresidingElectoralCollegeet.al.,) Defendants)
OPPOSITION
TOMOTIONTO
DISMISSTable
of
Author
i
ti
es
Owen Equipment
&
Erection
Co.
v.
Kroger,
437
U.S. 365
(1978)
..........
.
.......
p6
Un
itedMine Workers
of
America
v.
Gibbs,
383 U.S. 715 (1966))
...................
p6
Finley
v.
United
States,
4928 U.S.C.§ 13670 U.S.·545 (1989)
.......................
p6
Southern Pacific Terminal
Co
v
ICC,
219
U.S.
498,515(191l)
....................
p8
Headwaters,inc 893 F
2d
at
1016
......................................................
p8
Roe
vWade 410
U.S.
113(1973)
............................
.
....
.
........
..
....
.
.......
p8Barnett,
Keyes
ct
al
v
Obama
10-55084
9<~'
Circuit Court
of
Appeals
...........
..p9Drake,Robinsonv
Obama
09-568279
th
circuit Court
of
Appeals
........
.
.........
p9
Hollanderv McCain566 F.Supp. 2d 63, 68 (D.N.H. 2008)
................................
p9
Grinols
et
al
v
Electoral College
et
al Opposition
to
Motion
to
Dismiss
1
 
Case 2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD Document 115 Filed 04/03/13 Page 2 of 20
Tex.
DemocraticPartyv.Benkiser,
459 F.3d582,586-87
&
n.4
(5th C
ir
. 2006)
....
_p9
Schulz
v.
Williams,
44
F.3d48,
53
(2dCir.
1994)
.....
...
....
_
...
....
...............
.
...
.
...
p9
Fula
ni
v.
Hogsett,917
F.2d 1028,1030 (7th
Cir.
1990)
...................
....
......
....
.....
pl0
Owen v.Mulligan,.
640F.2d1130,
1132
-
33
(9t
hC
ir.
1981)
................................
pl2
CleavervJordan
Ca
Supreme court
minutesSeptember
26, 1968
Case
# 7838
..
p
12
28
u.s.c.
§
1367
....................
.
.............
.
........
.
........
.......
.................
p5
Ca
Elections
co
de 51
52
................
.
..
.
..
..
.......
...
.....
......................
.
......
p5
ARTICLE
2,
SectionI,clause5 U.S. Constitution
.
......
............................
p5
N\TRA
...
.
............................
....
.....
.........
..
........
.
...............
..
...
....
..
p65USC 3328
......
.........
...
.......................
..
.......
.
..........................
...
pl5
JusticeStephen Breyer"Making
our
DemocracyWork"..
...........
.
.......
.
...
....p14
TABLE
OF
CONTENTS
I.
OPPOSITION
ATHAND
IS
BEING
FILED
UNDER
THE
RES
E
RVATION
OF
RIGHTS
AND
WHILE
WAITING FOR
ADECISION
ON
THE MOTION TO CORRECT
THE
FAC
AND
ON
A
MOTION
FOR
STAY
WHfLE
THE
APPEAL
OF THE
DENIAL
OF
THE
DEFAULT
JUDGMENT AGAINST
THE
DEFENDANT
OBAMA
IS
BEING RULED UPON BY
THE
9TH
CJRCUIT
.
•.........
.
..
p4
U.
THE
CASEIS
NOT
MOOT
AS
TO
THE
STATE
DEFENDANTS.
THERE
IS SUPPLEMENTAL
AND
ANCILLARY
JURISDICTION
TO
HEAR CLAIMS
UNDER
STATE
STATUTES.
........
...
.....
P4
Ill.
THE
ISSUE
OF
ONE AND
A
HALF
MILLION
INVALID
VOTER
REGISTRATIONS IS
NOT MOOT
AND
IT
IS
AN ISSUE
THAT
IS
CAPABLE
OF
REPETJTlON, YETEVADING
REVIEW
...
..p6
Grinols
et
alv Electoral College
et
alOpposition to
Motion
to
Dismiss
2
 
Case 2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD Document 115 Filed 04/03/13 Page 3 of 20
IV.
NINTH CIRCUIT
RULED
THAT
THE
CANDIDATESHAVESTANDING AND
THE
COURT
HAS
JURISDICTION
TO
ADJUDICATE
THE
CASE
IF
THE
COMPLAINT
IS
FILED
PRIOR TO
CANDIDATE TAKING
OFFICE. SINCECOMPLAINT
AT
HAND
WAS
FILE
DON 12.12.2013,
PRIOR
TO
INA
UGl
J
RA
TION,
THE
COURT
HAS
JURISDICTION
TOHEAR
THE
CASE
OF
A CANDIDATE
IN
PRESIDENTIAL
ELECTION
COMMITTING
FRAUD
AND
USING
FORGED
AND
STOLEN
IDS
..........
.
...
.
...
.
......
.
..........
.
.....
.
.....
.
....
.
............
.
....
.
...
.
..
.
p8
V.
CALIFORNIA
PRECEDENT
OF
CLEAVER
V
JORDAN SHOWSELIGIBILITY
OF
A
PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE
TO
BE
A
JUSTICIABLEQUESTION,NOT
A
POLITICAL
NONJUSTICIABLE QUESTION
.
.
..
..
...
..
....
.
.........
.
.....
....
plS
VI.
VITHISCOURT
HAS
JURISDICTION
AND DUTY
TO
RULE
ON
THE
CLAIM
THAT
OBAMA VIOLATEDSUSC3328AND CANNOT
WORK
IN
THE
EXECUTIVEBRANCH
OF
THE
U.S.GOVERNMENT
................
....
.
.....
....
.......
.
.......
.
....
..
...
.
...
p16
Vll
.CONCLUSION
....
.
...
...
............
.
..
.............
.
...
...
.....
.
.........
.
pl8
Grinols
et
al vEle
ct
oral
Co
ll
ege
etalOppo
si
tion to
Motionto D
is
miss 3

Activity (10)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 hundred reads
kjreisman liked this
la428 liked this
Brendon Guiznot liked this
Neil Marshall liked this
DaisyMcGee liked this
Carl McNealy liked this
kjreisman liked this
Ellen Larson liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->