Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
5Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Bakunin - The Paris Commune and the Idea of the State

Bakunin - The Paris Commune and the Idea of the State

Ratings: (0)|Views: 42 |Likes:
Published by S*Burgess

More info:

Published by: S*Burgess on Mar 21, 2009
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

02/18/2013

pdf

text

original

 
The Paris Commune and the Idea of the State
by Mikhail Aleksandrovich Bakunin
First Published in 1871Alfred A. Knopf, New York, NY.
This work, like all my published work, of which there has not been a great deal, is an outgrowthof events. It is the natural continuation of my Letters to a Frenchman (September 1870), wherein Ihad the easy but painful distinction of foreseeing and foretelling the dire calamities which now beset France and the whole civilized world, the only cure for which is the Social Revolution.My purpose now is to prove the need for such a revolution. I shall review the historicaldevelopment of society and what is now taking place in Europe, right before our eyes. Thus allthose who sincerely thirst for truth can accept it and proclaim openly and unequivocally the philosophical principles and practical aims which are at the very core of what we call the SocialRevolution.I know my self-imposed task is not a simple one. I might be called presumptuous had I any personal motives in undertaking it. Let me assure my reader, I have none. I am not a scholar or a philosopher, not even a professional writer. I have not done much writing in my life and have never written except, so to speak, in self-defense, and only when a passionate conviction forced me toovercome my instinctive dislike for any public exhibition of myself.Well, then, who am I, and what is it that prompts me to publish this work at this time? I am animpassioned seeker of the truth, and as bitter an enemy of the vicious fictions used by theestablished order - an order which has profited from all the religious, metaphysical, political, juridical, economic, and social infamies of all times - to brutalize and enslave the world. I am afanatical lover of liberty. I consider it the only environment in which human intelligence, dignity,and happiness can thrive and develop. I do not mean that formal liberty which is dispensed,measured out, and regulated by the State; for this is a perennial lie and represents nothing but the privilege of a few, based upon the servitude of the remainder. Nor do I mean that individualist,egoist, base, and fraudulent liberty extolled by the school of Jean Jacques Rousseau and every other school of bourgeois liberalism, which considers the rights of all, represented by the State, as a limitfor the rights of each; it always, necessarily, ends up by reducing the rights of individuals to zero. No, I mean the only liberty worthy of the name, the liberty which implies the full development of all the material, intellectual, and moral capacities latent in every one of us; the liberty which knowsno other restrictions but those set by the laws of our own nature. Consequently there are, properlyspeaking, no restrictions, since these laws are not imposed upon us by any legislator from outside,alongside, or above ourselves. These laws are subjective, inherent in ourselves; they constitute thevery basis of our being. Instead of seeking to curtail them, we should see in them the real conditionand the effective cause of our liberty - that liberty of each man which does not find another manpisfreedom a boundary but a confirmation and vast extension of his own; liberty through solidarity, inequality. I mean liberty triumphant over brute force and, what has always been the real expressionof such force, the principle of authority. I mean liberty which will shatter all the idols in heaven andon earth and will then build a new world of mankind in solidarity, upon the ruins of all the churchesand all the states.I am a convinced advocate of economic and social equality because I know that, without it,liberty, justice, human dignity, morality, and the well-being of individuals, as well as the prosperity
 
of nations, will never amount to more than a pack of lies. But since I stand for liberty as the primarycondition of mankind, I believe that equality must be established in the world by the spontaneousorganization of labor and the collective ownership of property by freely organized producerspiassociations, and by the equally spontaneous federation of communes, to replace the domineering paternalistic State.It is at this point that a fundamental division arises between the socialists and revolutionarycollectivists on the one hand and the authoritarian communists who support the absolute power of the State on the other. Their ultimate aim is identical. Both equally desire to create a new socialorder based first on the organization of collective labor, inevitably imposed upon each and all by thenatural force of events, under conditions equal for all, and second, upon the collective ownership of the tools of production.The difference is only that the communists imagine they can attain their goal by the developmentand organization of the political power of the working classes, and chiefly of the proletariat of thecities, aided by bourgeois radicalism. The revolutionary socialists, on the other hand, believe theycan succeed only through the development and organization of the nonpolitical or antipoliticalsocial power of the working classes in city and country, including all men of goodwill from theupper classes who break with their past and wish openly to join them and accept their revolutionary program in full.This divergence leads to a difference in tactics. The communists believe it necessary to organizethe workerspi forces in order to seize the political power of the State. The revolutionary socialistsorganize for the purpose of destroying - or, to put it more politely - liquidating the State. Thecommunists advocate the principle and the practices of authority; the revolutionary socialists put alltheir faith in liberty. Both equally favor science, which is to eliminate superstition and take the place of religious faith. The former would like to impose science by force; the latter would try to propagate it so that human groups, once convinced, would organize and federalize spontaneously,freely, from the bottom up, of their own accord and true t their own interests, never following a prearranged plan imposed upon "ignorant"; masses by a few "superior" minds.The revolutionary socialists hold that there is a great deal more practical good sense and wisdomin the instinctive aspirations and real needs of the masses than in the profound intelligence of all thedoctors and guides of humanity who, after so many failures, still keep on trying to make menhappy. The revolutionary socialists, further more, believe that mankind has for too long submittedto being governed; that the cause of its troubles does not lie in any particular form of government but in the fundamental principles and the very existence of government, whatever form it may take.Finally, there is the well-known contradiction between communism as developed scientifically bythe German school and accepted in part by the Americans and the English, and Proudhonism,greatly developed and taken to its ultimate conclusion by the proletariat of the Latin countries.Revolutionary socialism has just attempted its first striking and practical demonstration in the ParisCommune.I am a supporter of the Paris Commune, which for all the bloodletting it suffered at the hands of monarchical and clerical reaction, has nonetheless grown more enduring and more powerful in thehearts and minds of Europepis proletariat. I am its supporter, above all, because it was a bold,clearly formulated negation of the State.It is immensely significant that this rebellion against the State has taken place in France, whichhad been hitherto the land of political centralization par excellence, and that it was precisely Paris,the leader and the fountainhead of the great French civilization, which took the initiative in theCommune. Paris, casting aside her crown and enthusiastically proclaiming her own defeat in order to give life and liberty to France, to Europe, to the entire world; Paris reaffirming her historic power of leadership, showing to all the enslaved peoples (and are there any masses that are not slaves?) theonly road to emancipation and health; Paris inflicting a mortal blow upon the political traditions of 
 
 bourgeois radicalism and giving a real basis to revolutionary socialism against the reactionaries of France and Europe! Paris shrouded in her own ruins, to give the solemn lie to triumphant reaction;saving, by her own disaster, the honor and the future of France, and proving to mankind that if life,intelligence, and moral strength have departed from the upper classes, they have been preserved intheir power and promises in the proletariat! Paris inaugurating the new era of the definitive andcomplete emancipation of the masses and their real solidarity across state frontiers; Paris destroyingnationalism and erecting th religion of humanity upon its ruins; Paris proclaiming herself humanitarian and atheist, and replacing divine fictions with the great realities of social life and faithin science, replacing the lies and inequities of the old morality with the principles of liberty, justice,equality, and fraternity, those eternal bases of all human morality! Paris heroic, rational andconfident, confirming her strong faith in the destinies of mankind by her own glorious downfall, her death; passing down her faith, in all its power, to the generations to come! Paris, drenched in the blood of her noblest children - this is humanity itself, crucified by the united international reactionof Europe, under the direct inspiration of all the Christian churches and that high priest of iniquity,the Pope. But the coming international revolution, expressing the solidarity of the peoples, shall bethe resurrection of Paris.This is the true meaning, and these are the immense, beneficent results of two months whichencompassed the life and death of the ever memorable Paris Commune.The Paris Commune lasted too short a time, and its internal development was too hampered bythe mortal struggle it had to engage in against the Versailles reaction to allow it at least toformulate, if not apply, its socialist program theoretically. We must realize, too, that the majority of the members of the Commune were not socialists, properly speaking. If they appeared to be, it was because they were drawn in this direction by the irresistible course of events, the nature of thesituation, the necessities of their position, rather than through personal conviction. The socialistswere a tiny minority - there were, at most, fourteen or fifteen of them; the rest were Jacobins. But,let us make it clear, there are Jacobins and Jacobins. There are Jacobin lawyers and doctrinaires,like Mr. Gambetta; their positivist...presumptuous, despotic, and legalistic republicanism hadrepudiated the old revolutionary faith, leaving nothing of Jacobinism but its cult of unity andauthority, and delivered the people of France over to the Prussians, and later still to native-bornreactionaries. And there are Jacobins who are frankly revolutionaries, the heroes, the last sincererepresentatives of the democratic faith of 1793; able to sacrifice both their well-armed unity andauthority rather than submit their conscience to the insolence of the reaction. These magnanimousJacobins led naturally by Delescluze, a great soul and a great character, desire the triumph of theRevolution above everything else; and since there is no revolution without the masses, and since themasses nowadays reveal an instinct for socialism and can only make an economic and socialrevolution, the Jacobins of good faith, letting themselves be impelled increasingly by the logic of the revolutionary movement, will end up becoming socialists in spite of themselves.This precisely was the situation in which the Jacobins who participated in the Paris Communefound themselves. Delescluze, and many others with him, signed programs and proclamationswhose general import and promise were of a positively socialist nature. However, in spite of their good faith and all their goodwill, they were merely socialists impelled by outward circumstancesrather than by an inward conviction; they lacked the time and even the capacity to overcome andsubdue many of their own bourgeois prejudices which were contrary to their newly acquiredsocialism. One can understand that, trapped in this internal struggle, they could never go beyondgeneralities or take any of those decisive measures that would end their solidarity and all their contacts with the bourgeois world forever.This was a great misfortune for the Commune and these men. They were paralyzed, and they paralyzed the Commune. Yet we cannot blame them. Men are not transformed overnight; they donot change their natures or their habits at will. They proved their sincerity by letting themselves bekilled for the Commune. Who would dare ask more of them?

Activity (5)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 hundred reads
doubleedgemirrow liked this
Johnald Chau liked this
S*Burgess liked this
erfmasn liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->