RESEARCH INSTRUMENT EVALUATION FORM DIRECTION: Kindly rate/evaluate according to the rating scale provided herein (based on Carter

V. Good and Douglas F. Scates Criteria). Indicate your rating by checking the appropriate column 4= VERY GOOD 3=GOOD 2=FAIR 1=POOR RATING CRITERIA OF EVALUATION 4 1. The questionnaire is short enough such that the respondent will not reject it because it will not consume much of his precious time. 2. The questionnaire has face appeal such that the respondent will be inclined to accomplish it fully. 3. The questionnaire can obtain some depth to the responses and avoid superficial answer or information. 4. The items and their alternative responses are neither too suggestive not too unstimulating. 5. The questionnaire can elicit responses, which are definite but not mechanically forced. 6. The items were stated in such way that the responses will not be embarrassing to the person concerned. 7. Items are framed in such manner as to allay suspicion on the part of the respondent concerning hidden purposes in the questionnaire. 8. The questionnaire is not so narrow, not restrictive or limited in its scope or philosophy. 9. The responses to the questionnaire, when taken as a whole could answer the basic purpose for which the questionnaire is designed and, therefore, are considered valid. TOTAL COMMENTS/SUGGESTIONS: ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ 3 2 1