Professional Documents
Culture Documents
( )
-
(..: 32)
: . ,
2011
1 ... 2
2 ... 7
3 13
4 . 21
5 33
6 ... 53
7 ... 62
8 .. 69
9 . 87
10 ......... 100
11 ...... 125
12 .131
13 .. 136
, ,
.1
. , ()
, , ,
,
. ,
, , ,
.2
.
(genres)
:
,
.3 , ,
, .4
,
1
, .
2
. , (: , 2009), 65.
. . . , :
, : , . . .
. . (: , 2006), 397.
4
.5
,
. ,
.6
:7
i) verbatim et litteratim
.
, .
ii) /
.
,
(..
)
.
iii) ( ),
(
5
, . Irwin, T. H. The
. D. Tarrant, Platos Use of Quotations and Other Illustrative Material, The Classical
Quarterly 1 (1951): 61.
).
.
iv)
. ,
/ .
,
,
. :
, , , .
, ,
, . ,
, ,
. ,
,
.
. , :
,
. ,
. , ,
,
, .
, .
,8
,
. , ,
.
, , .
,
,
.
,
,
, , .
.
,
8
,
,
.
.
, ,
,
.
, , .
. ,
,
.
II
9 . ,
X;. ,
10, .
.
,
, ,
.
5 ..11 Taylor
,
.
, ,
.12
, ,
. A. E. Taylor, : , . . (:
4
, 2009), 182.
10
. 5c-d.
11
, . M.
L. Morgan, Plato and Greek Religion, The Cambridge Companion to Plato, . R. Kraut (
21
. Taylor, , 183.
: Many new cults, rites, and practices flourished in Athens in the late
fifth century B.C., during and after the Peloponnesian War13. ,
,
.
,
, 14
, .
,
,
.
,
.15
16,
.
17
. :
13
14
( 4d 1-2).
15
, , , . 5c 3-4: (sc. )
*+.
16
17
(5d 8-9).
5e-6a
,
,
,
.
,
,
. ,
,
.18
:
.
,
( 719), 19,
459-506.20
,
:
. , ,
(. *5e 2-3]).
18
, .
19
, . ( 459).
6b 7 - c 1
,
, ,
*<+;
,
, ,
*<+;
,
,
( 5e-6a) .
,
, . ,
,
ad litteram .21 , ,
, .
(6a 8). , ,
,
21
10
22.
, 23
24.
(13e 10-1)
.25
, ,
*<+
26.
,
. , ,
.27 Most
, .28
22
. . , ., , (: , 2005), 71.
23
(. Taylor, , 183).
24
. , : , . . (:
5
, 2008), 264.
25
, . . , , 265-8 Taylor,
, 191.
26
. Taylor, , 191.
27
, , ,
.
28
11
(
II III ).29 ,
30
.
29
. . X.
30
12
I
.
31
,
:
- , : 8
, ,
, ,
. *<+ .
*<+. , ,
,
, .
, , ,
,
. *<+ . :
*<+. ,
,
, :
.
31
13
( ),
( ), (
32 ) (
) ,
.
,
, .
,
33 .
, ,
,34
,
35
.
, ,
,
36
(21b). ,
, .
:
32
( ,
) , . W. C. Greene, Platos View
of Poetry, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 29 (1918): 5, . 5.
33
, (
17a 2-3).
34
(17d 3).
35
, (18a 5-6).
36
. 20e-21a.
14
22b-c
, , .
, , .
. ,
,
,
. ,
.
, ,
, ,
.
, , . ,
. , , :
, ,
, .
, .
,
.
:
,
.
, ,
15
. 37 ,
,
( 532c 6), ,
,38
534c 7 - d 1,
.39
40 ,
.41 , ,
, ( 39e 1).
,
,
, ,
37
. . , , 413-4.
38
( 534c 2-3).
39
40
, .
. . , , 36 (2006): 95.
,
,
(22c 3-5).
41
22b-c
. . . . , .,
(: , 2002), 10-1.
16
,
(40c 8) .42
:
41a
, ,
, ,
, ;
; .
,
, ,
,
.
; , ,
; ( ,
) , , , .
,
,
,
.
: II, 365e 3
(sc. ) II, 366b 1-2
42
,
(40d 1-2).
17
.
Morgan
: The mythological tradition from Homer and Hesiod to Orphic
and Pythagorean and other contemporary lore was the natural vehicle for
Platos philosophical creativity43.
, ,
.44
West : Most Greeks in the late fifth and early fourth centuries B.C.
regarded Orphaeus, Musaeus, Hesiod and Homer, in that order, as their
oldest poets45.
.46
.47
,
, .
,
.
,
Most corpus
,
43
. M. L. Morgan, Platonic Piety: Philosophy and Ritual in Fourth-Century Athens, (New Haven: Yale
, . M. L. West, .,
3
46
47
. W. K. C. Guthrie, (: - .
, 2000), 72-3.
18
---
, ,
.48
, ,
,
,
. O Most
.49
, 41a,
.
,
,
, ,
(
). , ,
,
50 .51
,
41b-c,
52 ,
48
, . R.
Lamberton, : (: , 2005), 123-4.
51
. H. Koning, Platos Hesiod: not Platos alone, Plato & Hesiod, . G. R. Boys-Stones J.
19
,
:
.53
!54
, 41a
.
22b-c,
.
53
, ,
, ( 41b 5-7).
54
(41c 4-5).
20
IV
;
,
. ,
,
, .55
1.
56.
57,
.58
,
.
,
55
. , (: , 1990), 49-50.
56
. . , :
(: , 2001), 86.
57
Nothing is known about Ion apart from what Plato tells us (. Murray, Plato on Poetry, 99).
58
21
: 59.
,
.
, , ,
, , .
, ,
. , ,
,
.60
,
61
.
X X, :
531a 1-4
. *<+ :
; . ,
.
. , ,
, ;
, .
, /
59
, . Taylor,
, 63-4.
60
. 532c 5-7.
61
. (532c 8-9).
22
62 ,
. ,
.63
, : 64
,
, .
531a-d: I.
. ; .
. .
; . , ,
. . ;
. . . . ;
,
; . . .
, , ,
; . . .
, , ;
;
,
, ,
, ;
; . , .
62
, (530b 810 ).
63
64
. 533c.
Hesiod acts as a link between Homer and the very different poetry of Archilochus . N.
Yagamata, Hesiod in Plato: Second fiddle to Homer?, Plato & Hesiod, . G. R. Boys-Stones
J. H. Haubold ( : Oxford University Press, 2010), 76.
23
. ; ; . , ,
, . . ; ; . .
. ; . .
. ; ,
. . ,
; , ,
. . ; ,
. . . ,
; . .
, , ,
,
; . .
, ;
, ;
,
,
, , ,
, ,
; ; ,
. . ;
, , .
. ; ; . . ;
, .
531e-532a: II.
. ,
,
, , . . . .
; . .
24
. , ,
,
. . . ,
; .
532a-c: III. A
. ,
, , , ,
; . . . ,
, . .
. . , ,
,
, . .
, , , ,
,
, ,
;
. , ,
, ,
, , ; .
. , ,
.
. . , ,
,
,
. ,
, ,
,
25
, ,
;
, , 531e532b: (
[532b 3+)
*<+
,
(531d 4-7) ,
*<+ .
(532b-c), 532c,
,
,
.
,
(533d 3)
.
. , ,
, ,
,
533c-535a,
.
2.
26
531a-c 532a 6-8. ,
,
,
.
531a 2
532a 7
, .
,
.
. The motif of a contest between poets, seers, etc., is old; we
have the contest between Calchas and Mopsus in the Hesiodic Melampodia (fr.
278 M.-W.), and that between Aeschylus and Euripides in the Frogs65,
o West.
66
(, Certamen).
,
,
4 . ...
65
. M. L. West, The Contest of Homer and Hesiod, The Classical Quarterly 17 (1967): 441 .
27
, ,
Certamen, ,
67, .
:
1032-6
,
,
, , :
,
, , ;
.. () ,
,
,
, () ,
;68
,
, ,
. 531c, Graziosi : In
the course of his speech, Socrates stealthily moves from Homers area of
expertise (war) to Hesiods poetry: the births of gods and heroes69 is a perfect
description for the Theogony and the Catalogue of Women70. ,
67
. Certamen 13.
68
(. , .,
*: . . , 2006+).
69
(531c 8 - d 1).
70
28
, corpus,
.
, ,
,
,
71 , , ,
. , ,
; 531c
,
,
,
,
. Graziosi,
( )
,
.72
, ,
,
. , Certamen
,
71
.
72
. Graziosi, B. Inventing Homer: The Early Reception of Epic. : Cambridge University Press,
2002, 184.
29
.73 ,
,
.
He (sc. Hesiod) is useful
to establish that Homer represents all poetry. Once that point is made, Hesiod
disappears from view74. par excellence
,
75 (531d 8-9) ,
,
,
.
, . ,
ad locum ( )
.
530b 8-10,
,
, ,
76 .
, ,
540d-542a,
73
!
74
75
. 531d 5-6.
76
. , , 28
, . , ,
33-6.
30
,
,
.77
, 78 ,
, ,
.
Graziosi,
, ,
, 10 , 79
,
,
.80 Lamberton
.81
,
,
. ,
. ,
. ,
77
Certamen
. .
78
. 535a 10.
79
. 535b-e X, 605c-606d.
80
81
. Lamberton, , 157.
31
, . ,
, ,
. , ,
,
82
,
.
82
corpus.
32
. :
, ,
,
,
;
. , ;
,
.
, 234e 6-235a 5
:
.
,
,
, . , ,
,
.
340d,
,
289 291-2,
: ,
-
33
83 (316d) , ,
(320c-322d).
,
,
,
,
.84 , ,
,
Michael Gagarin:
The major reason why almost all scholars have misunderstood Platos intentions in
this dialogue is that they assume on the basis of other dialogues that Plato was
unalterably opposed to sophists on general and, therefore, to Protagoras. Examining
the Protagoras with this preconception, scholars then interpret every praise of
Protagoras as subtle irony, excuse every one of Socrates fallacious or morally
distasteful arguments as clever debating tactics, and magnify every small slip on
Protagoras part into a crushing defeat. The resulting interpretation of the Protagoras
naturally confirms the initial prejudice.85
1. 316c-317c:
83
. , , 31,
.
84
and celebrated characters, with more of dramatic winding, and more frequent breaks and
resumptions in the conversation, than any dialogue of Plato not excepting even Symposion and
2
Republic (G. Grote, Plato, and the Other Companions of Sokrates [: John Murray, 1888], .
2, 259).
85
. M. Gagarin, The Purpose of Platos Protagoras, Transactions and Proceedings of the American
34
,
(manifesto) .
,
86.
, ,
, -,
,
( , ...).
,
,
, ,
,
,87
.
,
, . O
86
, . Gagarin, The Purpose of Platos Protagoras, 140.
87
. . , . . , (:
, 2010), 170.
35
, De Natura Deorum ,
(3 . ..) ,
,
.
.
, ,
,
, ,
, .
, :
316d
,
, ,
, ,
, ,
*+.
, , ,
, () ,
, ,
,
, .
36
,
, .
, ,
(41a 4-6).88 , ,
,
, , .
, ,
. Kroh,
,
.*+ 89.
,
90
, ,
.91 , ,
,
88
. , 2.53.
89
praise : in the mouth of Socrates they are generally ironical (J. A. Adam, ., The Republic of Plato
2
. . . , 2 (: , 1999), 377.
37
,
.92
,
,
,
,
,
338e-348c,
.
, ,
,
,93
,
316d
.
2.
*<+
,
.
, 442-4
92
. H. S. Thayer, Platos Quarrel with Poetry: Simonides, Journal of the History of Ideas 36 (1975):
9-10.
93
Ford (sc. )
(326a 1) , ,
, The typical schoolbook, then, was more
likely to contain extracts from Hesiods gnomic poetry than his Theogony, . Ford, Platos two
Hesiods, 146-9.
38
, 94
, 95 (320c-322d)
96 (324d-326e). ,
.
.
:
Ai) .
Aii)
.
Aiii)
.
Aiv)
.
, ,
.
Av) , ,
97
, ,
. ,
. ,
,
, .
Avi) , , .
94
95
, , (320c 5).
96
, , (324d 5).
97
(321e 1-2).
39
Bi) , , ,
, ,
.
Bii) ,
, .
Biii)
. ,
.
Biv)
,
.
Bv)
,
.
, (320c-322a)
.
(322a-322d), ,
, Bi. ,
,
(Biii).
-
316c 498:
,
. , ,
:
98
, , , , .
85-7:
, ( )
. S. B. Levin, The Ancient Quarrel between Philosophy and Poetry Revisited ( : Oxford
University Press, 2001), 19.
40
361d
, , ,
.
.
,
. , ,
.
, ,
leitmotiv .
,
,
,
.
(349d),
.99 , ,
,100
.
, ,
,
99
, ,
, ,
, , .
100
, . 321b 1, ,
41
101
,
, ,
, ( 510-1).
, ,
102 .
103 (Ai)
(Bivv), .
, Aii
( 571-2),
60-3. , ,
, ,
.104 iii,
101
, , (309a 5)
(309b 1)
. , ,
, ,
(315b 7 315c 7).
,
, . H. Segvic, Homer in Platos Protagoras, Classical Philology 101,
no. 3 (2006): 247-62.
102
put popularly in a picture what might be put abstrusely, but a genuine Myth containing suggestions of
the kind which must be put or not at all, . J. A. Stewart, The Myths of Plato
(: Macmillan and Co., 1905), 221.
103
104
, ,
42
Vernant:
.
,
. ,
,
. *<+ ,
(),
105. , ,
ad locum
.106
(321b 5-6)
Aiv 85-9,
,
. ,
,
, :
, ', ( 89).
Av,
,
( 565-7, 50-2). , ,
,
, 571-84,
105
()
. J.-P. Vernant, , , . .
2
(: . , 1989), 17.
106
43
,107 () .108
Vernant,
,
, ,
, ,
,
,
109. , ,
,
, ,
,
.
, ,
110
.
252-5,
. vi,
521-5,
.111 , ,
: ,
318d-e,
, ,
107
108
, .
. 60-82,
.
109
. Vernant, , , 12.
110
. , 959.
111
44
,112
, .
,
. ,
,
, 113,
- .
,114
, ,
:
115,
Vernant.
,
.
112
Ad locum
.
113
*+.
, . 233-5.
Vernant,
(Vernant,
, , 12).
114
115
. Vernant, , , 18.
45
, ,
, ,
.
Biv, ,
, , , 192-3:
, .
: 195-200,
,
,
( ) ,
, *<+ ( 256)
( 258-60).
, ,
, .116 ,
,
, , . ,
,
,
persona,
.
3.
116
46
,
.
Thayer, Simonides is the first poet to quote and refer to his predecessors,
Homer, Hesiod, Stesichorus117. ,
, :
, fr. 37 D. = 74 P.
,
,
,
.
.118
,
.
,
, .
, 289-292, *<+119,
.
:
340d-e
117
118
(. , 2, 407).
119
. , 2, 405.
47
, ,
, .
,
, , , .
, , ,
.
, .
; .
, , ,
, , .
,
:
,
, , .
. , , :
, ,
. : ,
, ,
, . , .
;, . , ,
,
, .
120
, ,
120
, :
339e-342a, 342a-347a (. ,
, 30).
48
287-92121,
. 289 291-2. *<+
,
122, .
,
(340d 2),
289).
,
,
. ,
287-9 II, 364c-d,
lectio difficilior.123
718e-719a.
, ,
121
. :
, 287-92
, '
'
' ,
, .
122
. . . , (, 1967), 30.
123
. . X.
49
5 .
, .
, ,
,
(340d 1), , , ,
, ,
. ,
.
,
.124 , ,
, .
, , , ,
, .
,
,
, ( )
. ,
,
()
, ,
(). ,
,
, ,
. ,
124
, , ,
(339e 3-4).
50
125 /
,
(340e-341d),
.126
127.
,128
, ,
,
.
-
.
, ,
,
. ,
125
341d 6-7: .
126
, , ( )
( ).
. ,
(), Gagarin : Prodicus is thus portrayed as nothing more than a
rather pathetic toy (. Gagarin, The Purpose of Platos Protagoras, 151).
, C. Taylor : The reference to Cean dialect and the suggestion that Pittacus,
coming from Lesbos, could not speak proper Greek are all part of the joke (. C. C. W. Taylor, .,
3
. , , 30.
128
51
. , ,
,
. ,
, 338e-339a.
, ,
(339a 4).129
129
. 347c:
.
, ,
(. T. A. Szlezak, , . .
*: , 2004+, 68)
, (. Szlezak,
, 72).
52
VI
,
, ,
, ,
.
, ,
(
)
.
339a 3-5 :
,
, .
:
213e 2 - 214a 2
, ,
.
,
.
,
.
53
212e ,
(212e 7). , , ,
( *213e 4 - 214a 1+). ,
,
.
, 206d 1,
. , ,
,
130
.
, ,
,131
. , ,
,
, 132 ,
, , , ,
5 .
. , ,
,
130
, ,
212e,
.
131
. (205b 1) ,
205b-d.
132
54
1. 25-6
214a 2 - 214b 1
(sc. ) ,
,
. , ,
*<+.
,
. , ,
. , :
.
, , (214b-215c),
,
, ,
.
215c-d
55
, ,
,
,
.
, ,
. ,
, , ,
, .
,
25-6. :
, 25-6
,
.
, ,
. 25 . 26
. 26. . 25
.
Boys-Stones,
.
(..
56
133
135
136
Apparently, even in the remote past there were differences of reading, which may easily have
arisen before the time of Plato, and even have crept into manuscript copies of Hesiod (. G. E.
Howes, Homeric Quotations in Plato and Aristotle, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 6 [1895]:
163).
57
,
.
, ,
:
,
.
.137 , ,
,
(215e 1),
.138 ,
139 ,
. 140
,
.
211b 7,
, . , 216a,
,
, . ,
137
. .. .
138
. 215e.
139
. (216a 1-2).
140
what we might call a sophist in the mould of figures like Protagoras or Prodicus (. Yagamata,
Hesiod in Plato, 74-5).
58
, ,
, ,
.
, ,
,
,
. , (214a 1)
,
.
/ ,
,
.
, ,
Nightingale
:
It is only in the opening scene of the Lysis, of course, that Plato critiques the lover's
encomia. But this scene has important ramifications for the rest of the dialogue. For,
by setting up encomiastic discourse as a foil for Socratic discourse, Plato reminds us
to meditate not only on what Socrates says but how he says it and what sort of effect
it produces on the young. The dialogue, then, does not simply illustrate the Socratic
method by showing the philosopher in action. Rather, it defines and legitimates this
method by setting it in opposition to another brand of 'discourse offered to the
young'. By creating this opposition, Plato stakes out the territory of philosophic
language; he both defines and defends this new mode of discourse. 141
141
. A. W. Nightingale, The Folly of Praise: Platos Critique of Encomiastic Discourse in the Lysis and
59
,
.
. ,
, ,
.
,
,
,
25-6. 142
143
342a-347a,
,
.144 , ,
, ( )
142
,
*+ (. , , 76-77).
143
, . . V.
60
.
, , .
Tarrant : Apart from special instances of their use in
argument, his (sc. Platos) quotations appear frequently as passing analogies
*<+145 .
Ford, , Quotations suggest that for readers of
Platos time Hesiods Works and Days was usually encountered in pre-selected,
often pre-interpreted excerpts146. , ,
, , ,
:
,
147
/. ,
. ,
.
145
146
61
VII
. ,
,
.148 ,
. ,
,
. ,
, , .
, ,
persona ,
.
149,
,
, , 162c 1-3.
, ,
.
:
162d 2-3, , ,
,
148
, ,
, ,
(. Taylor, , 75).
149
. Taylor, , 76.
62
. , , ad locum
. , (163b
2)
,
, .
.150 , ,
leitmotiv .
(161b 4),
(161c 8), .
, *<+
(162a 8-10)
, *<+ (162b 3-4).
, , ,
, , (164e 5). ,
( [174b 10+)
, ,
(174b-c).
persona . 151
150
. 164d 165a.
151
166c ..,
, , ,
.
63
. , ,
(.. ,
) , ,
,
. ,
311.
1.
,
( )
,152
. :
163b-c
, (sc. ), ;
, (sc. ) .
, *] . ,
, ,
;
, ,
, ,
,
,
152
(162b 2) , , ,
:
(162b 8-9).
64
. ,
.
, ,
; , .
, . ,
, ,
; ,
, , ,
,
, ,
.
,
. , ,
,
. ,
.
.
153
. :
311
153
. , , , 56-7. Graziosi
.
4
. , ,
,
(. Graziosi, Hesiod in classical Athens, 120-5).
65
, .
154
155
. G. Nussbaum, Labour and Status in the Works and Days, The Classical Quarterly 10 (1960):
217.
66
156
.157 ,
,
340b-c.
,
.
,
.
341d-e
, 158
.
159 , ,
,160
.161
(169b-c),
(169c 5).
156
. : , ,
(163d 1).
157
(163d 3).
158
. , , 74.
159
. (163b 2) . . VII.
160
. . VI.
161
67
, ,
. ,
,
Graziosi:
Critias
162
68
VII
.
163 ,
- .164
.
(, ..) 5 4 ..
(.. 391c 4),
(384b 3) 165 (.. 396d 5),
.
.
. ,
, ,
,
.
, ,
, ,
.
163
. :
, ( 400b 4-5).
164
. Taylor, , 109.
165
Taylor
69
166
397b 410e
(397b 8).
,
,
.
.
.
1.
(391a 8),
,
, o
.
(391b-c)
. ,
166
70
.
163b 3.
,
.
,
, , , . 395e-396c, ,
.
/, ,167
, ,
:
396b-c
(sc. ) ,
, , , ,
, ,
,
,
, ,
, .
, . , ,
, . ,
167
, ,
( 3-4) . M. Regali, Hesiod in the Timaeus: The
Demiurge Addresses the Gods, Plato & Hesiod, . G. R. Boys-Stones J. H. Haubold (
: Oxford University Press, 2010), 266-7.
71
, ,
, .
,
,
, ,
,
.
, , 168
, .169 ,
, , .
,
.
116-22:
, , ,
. 119.
.170 ,
/ 410b 8 - 410c 3, 419a 9 - b 4
. :
()
168
(396b 7) , ,
. . ( 322a
1) , .
169
: (sic) ,
(. . . ,
*: , 1971+, 85, . 6).
170
72
,
(, , ) .171
.
, ,
,
. ,
,
,
,
.
2.
2. .
,
,
172.
. To
171
El Murr
. /
, . D. El Murr,
Hesiod, Plato, and the Golden Age: Hesiodic Motifs in the Myth of the Politicus, Plato & Hesiod,
. G. R. Boys-Stones J. H. Haubold ( : Oxford University Press, 2010), 279, . 7.
172
. 396d 3. .
, .
73
, ,
.
, .
( 106-201). ,
,
. :
397d-398c
. ; . *
+ . . , ,
; . . . .
; . . .
; . .
.
,
,
, , .
. ; .
.
. . . .
; . . .
; . . .
, , ,
. ,
,
. *
+ ,
, . . ,
, .
74
. , , ; .
, *
+. . , ,
;
. . , . .
; . . .
; . . . , ,
: ( *sc. +)
,
, , . .
; . ,
, .
. .
. . , , ,
, ; . . .
; . . . ,
,
(),
.
. , ,
, ,
, . ,
, . .
, .
121-3.
:
121-3
,
, , *<+.
75
V,
469a.173 , ,
. Howes
.174
, El
Murr
,
398b-c,
, , ,
.175 ,
( 122)
.176
, , :
173
174
. . X.
. Howes, Homeric Quotations in Plato and Aristotle, 163-5. .
176
76
,
, .177
, ,
.178 ,
.
, ,
,
.
. ,
,
( 202d-e).
202e-203a.
. , 617d-e 620d,
, ,
, .
corpus, ,
, ,
. 179
177
. V, 468d-369b.
178
. . .
179
77
,
:180 1216,
, . 181
, , ,
.182
( 252-5),
.183
,
, ,
.
,
ad locum.
,
340d,
180
. W. Burkert, , . . . . (:
, 1993), 381-2.
181
Howes
. M. L. West, . Hesiod: Works & Days (: Oxford University Press, 1996), 183.
183
78
, .
, ,
,
( 398a
5) .
184, ,
. ,
, III, 415a 4-5,
,
:
.
.
, ,
,
.185
,
,
, .186
184
. J.-P. Vernant, , , . .
2
(: . , 1989), 33.
185
.
186
El Murr
79
2. II.
,
: *<+ ,
( 400d 7-8).
, ,
, .
402b-c, , .
396c
. ,
, , , ,
,
.187 :
402b-c
;
;
;
.
,
.
.
187
, ad locum
( 402c 6 - d 2).
80
;
;
;
, , ,
. , , .
, ,
, .
.
Howes ,
,
337).188
, 201,
.
,
.
,
(
)
. , ,
, .
188
81
,
.
,
( )
.
,
,
: 189.
2. III.
406b 7,
,
:
406b 8 406c 1
, , .
.
, .
.
189
. . , ., , (: , 2008), 79.
82
, ,
,
. ,
197-8.
406c 7 - 406d 2
,
<> .
,
.
Levin,
,
.190 , ,
191
,
.
ad locum
,
.192
,
190
. 400d 7-8.
83
,
.193
,
,
. , ,
(391c-421c),
,
5 .194
,
.195
3.
.
( 121-3)
. ,
,
,
.
, 427d-e
193
194
, . Taylor, , 109-10.
195
. D. Sedley, The Etymologies in Platos Cratylus, The Journal of Hellenic Studies 118 (1998):
passim.
84
.
:
427e-428a
. , ;
, , *+ ;
. , . ,
, .
,
.
. , ,
()
; . ,
! , :
. , ,
, ,
, .
361:
.
, Howes.196
,
,
,
.
.
196
85
197
.
,
. ,
,
,
. ,
,
:
,
, .
, ,
,
.
197
86
IX
corpus:
. , ,
,
verbatim et litteratim .198
( 172b 3)
, .
116-7 120
, ,
. 199
, .
,
:
,
,
, ,
198
Graziosi, ,
,
, ,
. Graziosi, Hesiod in classical Athens, 130-1.
199
. . . , ., , (: , 2004), 196.
87
,
, . ,
.
1.
1. I.
.
( 178a 8),
(178a 10).
178b 1 - c 2
, ,
,
, ,
,
.
.
.
, ,
,
, ,
, .
88
,
. , ,
.
(sc. ) .
,
118-9,
,
,
, .
,
.
,
.200
, ,
, .
, ,
, ,
(178c 1).201
200
, :
, : , . . .
. . (: , 2006), 426-7.
201
Ford : Triads are of course inherently shapely in Greek, but they also carry a certain
logical force: one witness proves only that a poet held the view in question; two may be a case of
89
, ,
. Taylor, ,
,
.202
,
, ,
,
,
.203
, , Taylor,
,
, .204 ,
,
.
, ,
,
116-22
common error; a debater cultivated enough to muster three witnesses and so much the better if one
can find poets in agreement with prose writers can then conclude with Phaedrus, on all sides it is
agreed . Ford, Platos Two Hesiods, 141.
202
. Taylor, , 254.
203
, , 199.
204
. Taylor, , 254.
90
, .
1. .
. , ,
(
180d 7 - e 1).
188-92,
205 ,
( 11-26),206
. (
, )
.
205
, . , , 468.
206
The distinction between two kinds of love may well remind us of Socrates habit of dividing all
pursuits into the real and the mock activities. *+ But the two kinds of Eros also remind us inevitably
of the two kinds of Eris, or Strife, in Hesiod. As a matter of fact we can almost equate the two
distinctions: the good Eros in Pausanias speech is the good Eris in Hesiod and the bad Eros, the bad
Eris (. T. Gould, Platonic Love [: Routledge & Kegan, 1963], 126-7).
91
.207
,
,208
. ,
/,
.
,
, ( 570
.. 47 ..), (
190e-191a) (192d-e) -
.209 , 190c 3-4
,
183-6.
1. I.
/
,
.
(
207
. . VI.
208
( 186a 3-4).
209
320d 2-4 ()
, . . V. .
Yagamata, Hesiod in Plato, 78, . 35.
92
195b-c
,
, ,
, ,
,
, ,
, , .
, ,
, ,
. ,
,
, .
,
,
, , .
, ,
: .
, .
,
!
210
. , , 333, . 10.
93
(
), ( 178-82)
( 501-2 719)
.
6a-c:
,
.
(6b 5) ,
.
,
.
,
211 ,
. , ,
, 212
, .
/
.
211
. : (6c 7-8).
212
(sc. )
( 195c 6).
94
. 213
: (sc. ), ,
(195d 1).
, ,
: , .
,
, ,214
.
,
215, .216
, ,
:
,
.
.
2.
213
, , , , .
214
, ,
, .
215
. Taylor, , 265.
216
95
,
. , ,
,
.217
,
, *<+
.
(209a 1-6).
.
:
209c-d
217
. . VIII. Clay
(. D. Clay,
Platonic Questions: Dialogues with the Silent Philosopher [: The Pennsylvania State
University Press, 2000], 52),
,
, //
( ).
, ,
, .
96
,
, ,
.
,
,
, .
, ad locum ,
,
. 218
,
.
,
, ,
.
Janaway, Poetry is fine here because it gives rise to
wisdom and excellence a highly conventional thought which has been
challenged by the Socrates of earlier dialogues, and which the Socrates of the
Republic will deny outright219.
.220 , ,
218
209c-d, ,
41a.
219
Koning: The two poets (sc, Homer and Hesiod), when mentioned together, are often
referred to in discourse concerned with their all-embracing influence on Greek thought, that is, their
prominent place in education and the collective mind of the Greeks (. Koning, Platos Hesiod, 93).
97
.221
222
,
.223 ,
, ,
,
.
, .
,
,
.
,
, .
, , ()
.
,
221
222
(209d-e).
223
98
.
, ,
,
.
99
.225
, Janaway
.226
,
II, III X .
,
:
III, 402b 1 - d 3,
, , ,
.227
224
: ,
, , ,
(. N. Pappas, : , . .
*: , 2006+, 15).
226
227
, . . (: , 2006),
124-5.
100
,
II III,
228
229,
. , ,
,
(X, 602c 1-2).
(X,
595a 5 607b-c). ,
/ .
,
230 ,
. ,
,
, 231
228
: , , ,
; (601d 1-2).
230
231
106-201 (
106).
101
.
Pappas,
,
.232
,
,
. ,
Capra
, .233
/ ,
.
1. :
, II, 362e-367e.234
,
232
. Pappas, , 12-4.
233
. Koning: Here (sc. in the Republic), Hesiod in one and the same dialogue goes
from the blasphemous enemy of the state to the spiritual father of Platos eugenics *+ (Koning,
Platos Hesiod, 90).
234
102
,
, .
,
.
,
, ,
,
.
, II, 363a ..:
, 363a 6 - c 2
,
,
, , ,
, .
,
, ,
, .
, (sc.
) ,
. ,
,
103
235,
. ,
,
, '
, , 236.
233-4 ,
*<+
.237 ,
, corpus
.
,
, 402b-c.238
,
,
239
, ,
,
. , ,
235
. (. , ., :
, , *: , 2001+).
236
. . .
237
225-37,
.
238
239
104
.240
,
,
.
, , ,
.
,
. ,
,
( II, 363a 2),
,
(II, 364a ..). (,
364b 5),
, .
, 364c 5 - d 3
,
,
240
105
,
,
,
, .
.
,
. . ,
, .
,
, ,
,
, .
241
106
,
.
/
(
)
5 ..
, corpus,
.
.
2.
, ,
(
)
( II, 366e 5-9).
, ,
,
.242 ,
,
.
242
107
,
, ,
:
X, 600d 5 - e 2
, ,
,
, ,
,
, ,
,
, ,
,
;
X, 612a 8 - b 5
, , ,
,
, ,
, , ,
;
, , ,
,
. A,
,
, , , .
X, 600d-e
,
108
/ ,
,
. ,
, ,
, ,
(X, 600a ..).243
, , ,
, ,
(X, 600e 4 - 601a 2),
.
Murray, X, 600d 5-6
X, 600e 4-5.244
,
243
Murray,
, . Yagama, Hesiod in Plato, passim.
109
. ,
287-9 II, 364c-d,
. , ,
,
.
, X 612a-b,
, 363ac.
,
.
,
.
, ,
.
,
,
. ,
,
, ,
.
3. :
110
,
, .
, ,
.
Koning
,
, .245 ,
,
,
.
, II, 376d 9-10
.
,
,
.246
, ,
, ,
245
246
, , ;
111
.247
. ,
.
II, 377c-378a
, (sc. ), .
. ;
, .
, , .
.
, , ;
, , ,
.
;
*+ , ,
.
, , .
;
, ,
,
. ,
, , ,
, ,
.
, , .
. .
, ()
. ; . ,
247
112
. .
, , .
. . , ,
; . , ,
, . . ; .
, , ,
,
. . , ,
. , ;
. , , ,
,
,
. ,
,
,
, ,
, ,
. . , .
,
.248 X, 600d 5-6
,
ad locum
, .
. Adam : A
distinction is drawn between mere lies and the lie which is in itself ,
unbeautiful and immoral in tendency, e.g. the story of Uranus and Cronus
248
113
[...]. Such legends not merely misrepresent the gods, but also corrupt
mankind249.
( 154-82)
:
,
( 453-506).
,
( II,
379b 1). , ,
:
,
. ,
, (II, 377a 12 - b 3).
.250
, magnum opus
.
,
()
,
.
, , ,
.
.
249
250
114
,
/ ,
, II, 378d 5-7,
,
.251 ,
, :
,
.
,
.252
4. ,
II, 382c-d
:
,
. ,
, .
251
115
,
.
(III, 414b-415d):
,
, , ,
, ,
.
. , , ,
,
, . . ; .
. , , ,
, ,
,
(), .
*<+ ,
( ), , ,
, ,
116
. ,
.
( )
,
.
: ,
, ,
(414d ..). ,
(III, 414e 2), ,
.
,
( ) (III, 415a).
, ,
() ,
,
(III, 415c 5-7).
,
. Adam,
,
.253
: , ,
253
, . Vernant, . A, 40-3.
117
,
(, 414e 3-6).
, ,
,
.
.254
(
),
. ,
,
, ( 106-201).
,
.
,
, ,
,255
.
,
.
254
. Vernant, . A, 42-3.
255
118
, Vernant
. 256
, ,
(),
, ,
.257
, .
( 179)
,
( 180 ..).
,
. O Connor,
: )
, )
VIII IX, )
.258
,
,
256
. Vernant, , A, 54.
257
258
119
.
III, 415c 5 VIII IX,
,
.
, , ,
,
.
, , ,
, .
,
, ,
, .
X, 546a-547a,
.
, ,
.
III, 415 a259
259
120
.
ad locum
,
.
.
VIII IX
.
, ,
.260
,
.261
,
. 397d-398c,
(
121-6).262 :
V, 468e 4 - 469a 3
;
.
, ,
260
( 109 ..), ,
.
.
261
. . VIII.
121
,
, , ;
.
. ,
; .
,
, , ,
, ; .
. 121.
El Murr,
.263
,
, ,
:
.
( 122) .264
,
,
.265 ,
.
: ,
121-3
263
264
265
122
, . ,
,
.
.
5.
,
(390d 7-8):
, , ,
.
Most,
, .266
,
,
.
.
266
123
V, 466b-c
, , ,
, ,
,
,
.
, ,
,
, ,
, ,
,
,
.
( 40)
, West.267
. , ,
.
,
ad locum
. ,
( 361),
(
,
(, , ).
267
. M. L. West, ., Hesiod: Works and Days (: Oxford University Press, 1996), 152.
124
, , ,
.
210d,
,
.
,
, ,
.268
corpus
,
,
, ,
.
268
, 152a 1 ,
152e,
201 (. . VIII),
( 152e 7) 173e,
,
(fr. 292 Maehler).
125
1.
,
.
,
[ 155c 9+) (
) (155a-c).
:
155d
. , , .
,
,
.
. , ,
. , , ,
,
,
.
Koning, ad locum
()
().269
269
126
: ,
( 408b 4-5). , , 265-6270
sine qua non
, .
, ,
(172c-176c). , 173c-174a
, ,
,
.
, (
.271
155d, ,
.
,
, , ,
(177b),
.
270
( 265-6).
271
: (sc. )
127
,
,
,
,
.
,
,
. ,
,
, .
,
.
,
.
175e 5 - 176a 2,
.
2.
(201d 1).
,
128
, ,
.
,
.
206e-207a
.
. ,
.
. , ;
. .
,
, , , , , .
. .
. , , ,
.
,
. . , ; .
. , ,
.
, , ,
. . .
456. West,
.272 ad
272
129
locum
(207c 2-3)
.273
,
,
(207c-208b).274
.275
.
,
276.
273
274
. Taylor, , 397.
275
276
130
XII
,
. , ,
,
,
. ,
, .
R. Graves, , , . .
()
. ,
,
,
.
.
, ,
. ,
131
.277
. :
. .278
. ,
.279
.
.280
.
.281
. .282
.
.283
277
Lamberton (. Lamberton,
, 179-92).
278
377e-378a 155d.
280
600d X, 612b.
281
282
178b.
283
III, 390e.
132
.
,
.
,
, .
, ,
,
.
( 428a), ( V, 466c)
( 207a).
,
.
,
.
,
.
, ,
,
.
,
, .
133
, ,
, , leitmotiv
. , ,
, .
, , ,
.
. , ,
,
,
.
verbatim ,
. , ,
.
corpus
.
,
.
,
.
.
,
.
134
.
,
,
.
. ,
,
,
.
.
135
Adam, J. A., . The Republic of Plato Vol. I. : Cambridge University
Press, 21905.
_____, . The Republic of Plato Vol. II. : Cambridge University Press,
2
1907.
136
1888.
Guthrie, W. K. C. . . . .
: - . , 2000 [1952].
137
Halliwell, S. The Subjection of Muthos to Logos: Platos Citations of the Poets. The
Classical Quarterly 50 (2000): 94-112.
Havelock, E. A. Preface to Plato. Harvard University Press, 71994.
Howes, G. E. Homeric Quotations in Plato and Aristotle. Harvard Studies in
Classical Philology 6 (1895): 153-237.
Hornblower, S. A. Spawforth., . The Oxford Classical Dictionary.
: Oxford University Press, 32003.
Janaway, C. Images of Excellence: Platos Critique of the Arts. : Oxford
University Press, 1995.
, . ., . . , . . :
, 1998.
Irwin, T. H. The Platonic Corpus. . 63-87 The Oxford Handbook of Plato,
. G. Fine. : Oxford University Press, 2008.
Kato, S. The Apology: The Beginning of Platos Own Philosophy. The Classical
Quarterly 41 (1991): 356-64.
, ., . . , . . :
, 2002.
, ., . , . : , 22005.
Koning, H. Platos Hesiod: not Platos alone. . 89-110 Plato & Hesiod, .
G. R. Boys-Stones J. H. Haubold. : Oxford University Press, 2010.
Kroh, P. . . .
. . : University Studio Press, 1996 [1972].
, . ., . . . . :
, 2010.
Lamberton, R. : . . . . :
, 2005 [1988].
_____. Homer in Antiquity. . 33-54 A New Companion to Homer, . I.
Morris B. Powell. - - : Brill, 1997.
Levin, S. B. The Ancient Quarrel between Philosophy and Poetry Revisited.
: Oxford University Press, 2001.
, . . . , 1967.
Morgan M. L. Platonic Piety: Philosophy and Ritual in Fourth-Century Athens. New
Haven: Yale University Press, 1990.
138
M.
Hesiod
in
the
Timaeus:
The
Demiurge
Addresses
the
139
Richardson, N. J. The Contest of Homer and Hesiod and Alcidamas Mouseion. The
Classical Quarterly 31 (1981): 1-10.
Sedley, D. The Etymologies in Platos Cratylus. The Journal of Hellenic Studies
118 (1998): 140-54.
Segvic, H. Homer in Platos Protagoras. Classical Philology 101 (2006): 247-62.
, . . 2. : , 21999.
, . ., . : .
: , 21991.
_____, . , . : , 142008.
Solmsen, F. Hesiodic Motifs in Plato. . 173-211 Hsiode et son influence
(Entretiens sur lantiquit classique 7), . K. von Fritz. : Fondation
Hardt, 1962.
, . ., . , . : ,
2004.
Stewart, J. A. The Myths of Plato. : Macmillan and Co., 1905.
Szlezak, T. A. . . . . :
, 2004 [1993].
Tarrant, D. Platos Use of Quotations and Other Illustrative Material. The Classical
Quarterly 1 (1951): 59-67.
Tate, J. Plato and Allegorical Interpretation. The Classical Quarterly 23 (1929):
142-54.
Taylor, A. E. : . . . . :
, 42009 [1978].
Taylor, C. C. W., . Plato: Protagoras. : Oxford University Press,
3
2001.
2009.
140
Vernant, J.-P. . 2 . . . .
: . , 21989 [1985].
, . : . . . .
: , 52008.
West, M. L. The Contest of Homer and Hesiod. The Classical Quarterly 17 (1967):
433-50.
_____, . Hesiod: Theogony. : Clarendon Press, 31997.
_____, . Hesiod: Works and Days. : Oxford University Press, 21996.
_____, . Homeric Hymns, Homeric Apocrypha, Lives of Homer. ,
: Harvard University Press, 2003.
Yagamata, N. Hesiod in Plato: Second fiddle to Homer?. . 68-88 Plato &
Hesiod, . G. R. Boys-Stones J. H. Haubold. : Oxford
University Press, 2010.
141