Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Marcelo Alejandro Cao, A089 207 044 (BIA Jan. 31, 2012)

Marcelo Alejandro Cao, A089 207 044 (BIA Jan. 31, 2012)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 45 |Likes:
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) found the Form I-213 introduced by the DHS failed to establish the respondent's alienage because it was based on information taken from a denied I-140 petition in the respondent's A-file that was not in the record. The decision was written by Member Linda Wendtland.
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) found the Form I-213 introduced by the DHS failed to establish the respondent's alienage because it was based on information taken from a denied I-140 petition in the respondent's A-file that was not in the record. The decision was written by Member Linda Wendtland.

More info:

Published by: Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center on Apr 12, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

10/12/2013

pdf

text

original

 
Weber, Matthew B.Mattew B. Webe, Aorney
4
Bickell Avenue Suite 300Miami, FL 33131Name: CA, MARCL ALEJANDR
   
xective Oce r mmiion Review
Board of mmigration ppealsOce of he Clek
5107eesbu Pike, Site 2000Fal C/rc/, Vgina 2 204
OHS/ICE ce of Cef Counsel
MIA 333 South Miami Ave., Sute 200Miam, L 33130 A089-207 04Date of this notce 1/31/2012
nclosed is  copy o e Bods decision nd ode in te bovereenced csenclosePnel Members:Cole Ptrici APey, Roe endtnd ind inceely,onn CrCie Clek
Cite as: Marcelo Alejandro Cao, A089 207 044 (BIA Jan. 31, 2012)
 
US D  J
Executiv Oe  Imgraton ReewDeson of he Boad of mgaton AppealFal Chh,
Virgna
2204 
FileA089 207 044
-
Miami, FL e MARCELO ALEANDRO CAO RMOVA ROCDGSAALO BHALF OF SPONDETaew B. Weber, EsquireON BEHALF OF DHSCHARTimoy M CoeAssisan Cie ConseDae: Noice Sec212(a)(6)(A)(i), & Ac[8U.SC§ 1182(a)(6){A)(i)]resen wio being admited or paroedAPLICAION Removabiliy
JAN 3120
On Sepember 23, 2009, an Immigraion Jdge nd e responden removable as carged eresponden, a naive and ciizen o Argenina, now appeals. Te responden's reqes r oraagmen is denied prsan o 8 CF.R. § 1003 (e)(7) (2011) e record wi be emandedWe review an Imigraion Judge's ndings o c nder a "cleary eoneous sndard8 C.F.R. § 1003.(d)(3)(i). We review a oer isses, inclding weer e paries ave me erelevan burden o proo, and isses o discreion, under a
 de novo
sandard 8 C.FR.§1003.(d)(3)(ii);
Matter of
-S-B-,
24 & Dec. 493 (BIA 2008).Te responden denied e alegaions se r in e oice o Appear and cose no o esa e maser calendar earing on Sepember 23 209 regarding is aieage (J a 2; r a 12-13)On appeal, e responden arges a e Deparen o omeland Secriy ("DS) did no meeis burden o sow by cear, unequivoca, and convincing evidence a e responden is an aiensjec o remova (Respondens Br a 2, 4)
See Woodby v.
S
385 S 276 (1966). Heargues a e Form -213 (Record o Deportabe/nadmissile Aien), wic was e only evidenceoered by HS o sow aienage, was inscen proo o aienage Responden's Br. a 4us e argues a e Imigraion udge erred in nding im o be removae as cargedWe conclude a a remnd is warraned in is case n
Matter of Ponce-Hernandez,
22 I&NDec 784 (BIA 1999)weeld a nowisnding is lack o deaied inrmaion i is nraivepoion, or inrmaion as o ow i was compleed, e Fo -213 was scen o sow alienagebecase i conained deailed inrmaion in is nonnarraive porion regarding e names andnaionaiy o e alien's parens e reign own were e aien resided bere e enered e
Cite as: Marcelo Alejandro Cao, A089 207 044 (BIA Jan. 31, 2012)
 
A089 20 0Unted Sates llegally, as ell as he alen's se, eye color, and har color
Id
at 78 787 Alhoughthe o 21 n the nsant case ndcates that the respondent as bo n Buenos Ares, Argentna, d a fregn bth creates a rebttable presmpton o aenage, te frm lacks the other detas thatled us to conclude n
aer ofPonceHeandez supra
that he or 21 suced to esablshaenagee aso note tha there s reason to beleve that the nfaton provded on the nsant o-2as obtaned om a source oter than he respondent Speccay, the f epressly statesn the naatve poron that "A nfaton as taken om the A-le That A-le nfraton,n
,
appears o have come om a om -140 (Peon fr Alen orker, hch s no n therecord befre
u
Hence, e canot assess the relablty o the oaton provded on the orm21 n ths respec the nsant case s her dstngshabe om
aer ofPonceHernandezsupra
n hch e concluded tha here as nothng to ndcate tha the nfrmaton contaned onthe o 21 came om anyone other than the alen
Id
at 785or these reasons e conclde that he o 2 n ts case s no sucent evdence to provethe respondent's alenagee er conclude that a remand s aanted fr te mmatonudgeto make rter ndngs o ct regrdng the respondent's alenage and reovably Onremand, the pates shall be gven an opportnty to provde her nfrmaton regardng erespondent's alenage and removablyAccordngly, the fllong order ll be enteredORDER e appeal s susaned and the record s remanded fr rther poceedngs consstentth ths opnon and fr te entry o a ne decson
Board Member Roger
A.
Pauley respectfuy dissents wthoutopnon.
1
Te transcrpt reects tat te HS had addtonal puported evdence o alenage that t asllng to oer, speccally the denal o the orm -0 (Tr at 141) The mmgraon Judge,hoever, led tat the om 2 as sucent, and the S dd not have he oppou tosubm he addtonal evdence (Tr at
I
6)2
Cite as: Marcelo Alejandro Cao, A089 207 044 (BIA Jan. 31, 2012)

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->