Living with Torah
David Jay DerovanJerusalem 5760It is a tale with a sad ending. It begins with sunshine and light but it ends with darknessand despair. It begins with clarity of vision but it ends in muddy confusion. The original tale istold in
Baba Metzi’a
, on
Daf
84,
Amud Alef
. Here is my version.On a warm, clear day, Rabbi Yochanan went swimming in the Jordan River. “And justwho was this Rabbi Yochanan?” you ask. Rabbi Yochanan was a pre-eminent Rabbinic scholarfrom the Galilee town of Tzippori. He was on his way to becoming the greatest sage of his time.He was responsible for the
Talmud Yerushalmi
. And he was a most handsome fellow!So, where were we? Oh, yes, Rabbi Yochanan was swimming in the river. All of asudden, in jumps a striking fellow named Shimon. Rabbi Yochanan immediately recognizedthis second bather for what he was, namely a Jewish bandit. Recognizing a strong, muscularfellow when he sees one, Rabbi Yochanan called out to him, “Your strength was meant forTorah!”“And your beauty was meant for women!” replied the robber.“Do
Teshuva
, return to the Torah of your youth and you can marry my sister, who is evenmore beautiful than me!” countered Rabbi Yochanan.To make a short story even shorter, the bandit agreed. Funny, though, after acceptingRabbi Yochanan’s challenge to study Torah seriously and to become a
Ba’al Teshuva
, Shimonthe bandit could not manage to jump back onto the riverbank. My
Chavruta
, Rashi¸ explainsthat after placing the yoke to Torah and
Mitzvot
on his shoulders, Shimon lacked the strength forhis usual acrobatics.Thus began a lifelong friendship and partnership between two outstanding personalities.The
Gemara
reports that Rabbi Yochanan taught his new disciple, Shimon ben Lakish, Bibleand
Mishnah
and made out of him a great man. Rabbi Yochanan lived to be almost 100 yearsold. Rabbi Shimon ben Lakish – fondly known as Raish Lakish – was about 10 years his junior.The first half of our tale must have taken place when both men were relatively young. Thus, wecan safely assume that they studied together for close to seventy years! Is it any wonder that attimes Rabbi Yochanan calls Raish Lakish, “my right hand”? Aside from being brothers-in-law –yes, Raish Lakish did marry Rabbi Yochanan’s beautiful sister – they were inseparable, likebrothers. To the untrained eye, it would seem that they were formidable adversaries, for theyseem to argue with each other on almost every page of the Talmud and Midrash. Yes, theyargued vehemently about every major halachic and aggadic issue. However, it was a true laborof love between two scholars, between a life-long mentor and a life long disciple. Step into any
Bayt Midrash
and you can hear the Rabbi Yochanan’s and Raish Lakish’s of today arguing atthe top of their lungs, but you can see in their eyes, in their gestures that they are also the best of friends.For almost seventy years Rabbi Yochanan and Raish Lakish were a successful
Chavruta
,learning pair. Until one day, when the discussion in the
Bayt Midrash
was turned to swords andknives. When can a sword or a knife or a long knife or a spear or a hand sickle or a sickle forharvesting become ritually unclean,
Tamay
? Everyone agreed that these items can becomeritually unclean,
Tamay
when the smithy is finished making them. So when is themanufacturing process complete? For an authoritative answer, all eyes and ears were turned tothe two elder rabbinic statesmen who were present. Sure enough, an argument ensued. RabbiYochanan said, “They can become ritually unclean,
Tamay
, from the time they are shaped byfire in the furnace.”Raish Lakish disagreed. “They can become ritually unclean,
Tamay
, only after they havebeen polished with water.”Let’s take a moment to reflect. My other
Chavruta
, Tosafot, raised an interestingquestion. Here, we have two of the greatest, if not the greatest sages of their time making afundamental error. The
Mishnah
in
Kaylim
, which deals with these issues, states exactly whenthe manufacturing process is considered completed for each kind of knife or bladed object. Theonly problem is that neither Rabbi Yochanan’s nor Raish Lakish’s answers agree with the
Leave a Comment