Bleeding Communities Dry 1
Executive Summary & Key Findings____
No group of Minnesotans are more qualied to comment on the challenges of delivering public servicesduring a period of diminishing resources than our state’s city mayors. Minnesota 2020, in partnership with theCoalion of Greater Minnesota Cies, and Macalester College, surveyed 43 greater Minnesota mayors aboutthe crical issues facing Minnesota cies.As a result of large reducons in state aid, Minnesota cies have been compelled to increase property taxesat the same me that they must cut essenal services. From 2002 to 2008, real (i.e., inaon adjusted) percapita state aid to Minnesota cies declined by 47 percent. Because of their relavely low per capita tax base,greater Minnesota cies are more dependent on state aid than cies in general.The Minnesota 2020 mayors’ survey highlights the harm done to greater Minnesota cies from past aid cutsand the damage of future aid cuts from the perspecve of the greater Minnesota mayors. The responses,which clearly show the strain many of the cies are under to provide crical services with less and less, donot include the impact of the $66 million cut to city local government aid (LGA) and market value homesteadcredits in December 2008 resulng from the Governor’s unallotments. Those cuts occurred aer the surveywas conducted.
Ongoing State Cuts are “Devastang” to Minnesota Cies
•Given that the state of Minnesota greatly restricts the abilies of cies to generate revenue from localtax bases, it is not surprising to learn that 81.4 percent of the mayors surveyed agreed that the state hasan obligaon to assist in funding city services.
Add a Comment