Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Doubling time The shorter the D.T. the higher degree of malignancy
Table 1. Mean volume doubling time in weeks. In Tannock IF and Hill R. The Basic Science of Oncology. 2nd ed. Mac Grow Hill Inc. Health Professionals Division. New York 1992, p. 155 NO TUMOR TYPE MEAN DOUBLING TIME
( in weeks )
1 Primary Lung Cancer - Adenocarcinoma 21
12
11
- Primary
- Lung metastasis - Soft tissue metastasis
14
11 3
- Lung metastasis
4 Lymphoma - Lymph node lesion 5 Lung Metastasis of - Testis carcinoma - Childhood tumours - Adult sarcoma
14
4 4 7
Grade of cell differentiation ( Pleomorphism, Mitotic Index, Necrotic Cell ) The higher grade of differentiation, the lower degrees of malignancy, and the better prognosis Lymphoid infiltration ( Medullary Ca, Invasive Ductal Ca. )
I. Clinical Manifestation
A. As Primary Tumor
B. As Metastasis
Bleeding from the ulcer or abnormal bleeding or discharged from the body orifice. Obstruction of the body canal Malfunction or disfunction of the organ ( Organ Failure ) Infection
B. Pathological
Procedures in
Diagnosis
Taking
Biopsi Cytology material Operative specimen
Process for microscopic slide Evaluating Histological slide is only small sample of tissue
in sampling / processing error interprestation The pathologist have be informed the clinical presentation and corelate to microscopic finding.
Error
Report of Operative
Form Size Angioinvasi Radically of Operation Involvement of Lymph Node
A lesion ( plaque, tumor, ulcer which grows progressively Sign of infiltration The presence of sign of metastasis to regional lymph nodes or to remote organs
Clinical Presentation and Histologic Type 2. Clinical Diagnosis and Pathological Diagnosis
1.
Benign tumor Tumor of uncertain behaviour In situ cancer Invasive cancer
3. Degree of Malignancy
Clinical Degree of
BENIGN TUMOR
Regular
MALIGNANT TUMOR
Irregular
Sharply demarcated No or demarcated Present Normal Normal No or pseudo-capsule Hyper & neo-vascular Hyperaemia
6 Necrotic
7 Ulceration 8 Recurrent
Seldom
Seldom Seldom
Often
Often Often
9 Growth
10 Metastasis
11 Organs Function Seldom disturb 12 Systemic effect 13 Fatal Outcome Seldom Seldom
2 In situ neoplasma
D00 to D09
C00/2 to C80/2
It is important to keep in mind when to think about early cancer. We have to think about cancer when discover : 1. One or more of the 7-danger signal of cancer CAUTION :
C = Change in bowel or bladder habit A = A sore that does not heal U = Unusual bleeding or discharge T = Thickening or lump in the breast or else where I = Indigestion or difficulty in swallowing N = Nagging cough or hoarseness
ICD X
C00 to D48
C00 to C97 C00 to C75 C76 C77 to C79 C80 C81 to C90 C91 to C96 C97
ICD - 0
C00 to C80
C00/. to C80/. C00/3 to C77/3 C76/3 C00/6 to C80/6 C80/9 C77/3 C42/3 -
1 Neoplasm
2.
3.
Tumor in a high risk group : old age, family history, post radiation, immune compromised. The present of small lesion ( plaque, tumor, erossion ) fit no to the clinical criteria of benign lession.
4 Cancer cells
-
Mitosis
Rare No
- Anaplastic
Normal Regular
Loss Irregular
No
Present
Present No or present of pseudocapsule Normal Often irregular Normal Sometime aberrant Normal Present of free RNA particles
Golgy apparatus
10 Metastasis
Table 5. Grade of differentiation of squamous cell carcinoma according to Broder. The present of pearl formation indicate well differentiated
Grade I II III IV
Differentiation
Well
Moderately
Poorly
Undifferentiated
Mature Cell ( % )
> 75
50- 75
25 - 50
< 25
Table 6. Grade of differentiation of adeno carcinoma of the breast according to Bloom and Richardson. Mitotic index per 10 HPF = High Power Field
Grade Differentiation Tubular Formation ( % ) Nuclear pleomorphism Mitotic index ( % ) I Well > 75 min < 10 II Moderately 50 - 75 moderate 10 - 20 III Poorly 25 - 50 high 20 - 25 IV Undifferentiated <25 High >25
Pleomorphism
Mitotic index Tubular formation ( % )
> min
0-5 > 75
moderate
6 - 10 10 - 75
High
> 10 PPF < 10
no
0-9
< 50
10 - 19
> 50
> 20
NO
The higher the degree diagnostic methods employed, the more valid is the diagnosis C Factor The higher the degree of C-Factor the more certain is the diagnosis
Evidence from standard diagnostic means (e.g. physical C1 examination, standard radiography, endoscopy for tumours of certain organs ) Evidence obtained by special diagnostics means (e.g. radiographic imaging in special projections, C2 tomography, CT-scan, USG, lymphography, angiography, scintigraphy, MRI, endoscopy with biopsy or cytology )
Evidence from surgical exploration, including biopsy C3 and cytology Evidence of the extent of disease following definitive C4 surgery and pathological examination of rescted specimen
No
Clinical Presentation
Pathological Findings
Infiltration of cancer cells to the ligament of Cooper
1 Skin retraction
2 Skin fixation
3 Peau d orange 4 Ulceration
6 Mastitis carcinomatosa Widespread of skin and subcutaneous infiltration Restriction the of 7 tumor mobility to the pectoral muscle Infiltration of cancer cells to the pectoral fascia
Restriction of the
shoulder joint mobility
Well defined Smooth surface Without sign of infiltration Located superficial in an organs
Small tumor Look like benign tumor Does not located in well known organs for benign tumor Does not necessary benign tumor
Clinical manifestation of malignant tumor in early stage practically the same of benign tumor The probability of the malignant always keep in mind Consider : Epidemiologic data, the age, risk, site of tumor
Clinical and pathological examination benign Treated as benign Recurrent Malignant Granulosa, Leydig, Sertoli, Thymoma. Of boderline malignancy
3. Insitu Cancer
No in soft tissue sarcoma Clinically : Plaque or erosion Final diagnoses based on pathological examination < 5% of the clinically diagnosis is right
Tumour of the Path exam Discover diagnosis < 10% clinical diagnosis is right Correlation clinical diagnosis and early cancer is poor
B. Advanced Cancer
Sign of infiltration and metastaes Clinical diagnosis is not difficult > 70% clinical diagnosis is right Correlation between clinical diagnosis and
pathological diagnosis is good Recurrent tumor where the former diagnosis was benign, the current diagnosis is a big problem Epidemiological data for certain degree may help to solve the problem
Some problems (no correlation between the clinical and the pathological diagnosis) :
Clinically manifestation as benign neoplasm, but pathological as malignant, such as : Juvenile Melanoma Clinically manifest as malignant tumor, but pathologically as benign : Papillary Adenoma of Thyroid
Tumor of the first or second presentation clinically and pathologically look like as benign but if treated as benign usually after a periode of TME will recur : Deep seated fibroma and lipoma Clinical and pathological presentation as benign tumor, but demonstrate metastases to regional node or even remote organ : Thyroid Adenoma
No primary tumor can be discovered, but presents with pathologically proven metastases to one or more organs MUO (Metastases of Unknown Origin)
Terima Kasih