• Embed Doc
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
588
IRRIGATION IN THE UNITED STATES
Table 1. Top 15 States with Increases in Irrigated
Surfaces, 1974\u20132000 and 1992\u20132000
1974 \u2013 2000
%/year
South Carolina
11.78
Georgia
10.60
Vermont
9.19
Missouri
8.74
Mississippi
8.72
Indiana
8.05
Minnesota
7.98
Illinois
7.64
Tennessee
7.23
Kentucky
7.20
Maine
6.99
Alabama
6.41
Arkansas
6.18
Michigan
5.76
Delaware
5.59
North Carolina
5.29
1992 \u2013 2000
%/year
Connecticut
17.20
Maine
17.07
New Hampshire
17.07
South Carolina
11.91
Vermont
11.45
Kentucky
11.44
Georgia
9.87
Ohio
9.51
Missouri
8.18
North Carolina
7.13
New York
7.09
Arkansas
6.61
Rhode Island
6.59
Tennessee
6.34
Mississippi
6.12
New Jersey
5.98
WATER WITHDRAWALS

The geography of water withdrawals for irrigation (Fig. 6) con\ufb01rms the dominant role of irrigation in agriculture in the West: large withdrawals take place in this part of the country in every state but a few of them and reaches levels as high as 70.1 billion m3/year in California (see Table 3).

But the geography of water withdrawals also shows that eastern states withdraw appreciable volumes of water for irrigation: Florida, of course (9.1 billion m3/year), largely because of the fruit and sugar indus- tries; but also Georgia (2.2 Bm3/year); North and South Carolina (cotton, peanuts, corn, tobacco); New Jer- sey; Massachusetts (0.33 Bm3/year); and Michigan. In the three latter states, large water withdrawals are largely accounted for by the redevelopment of fruit and vegetable cultures for nearby urban markets. Central States in the Missouri/Mississippi basin also use sig- ni\ufb01cant water for irrigation: Nebraska (14.4 Bm3/year), Arkansas (13.3 Bm3/year), Kansas (5.7 Bm3/year), Missis- sippi (2.1 Bm3/year), Missouri (2.1 Bm3/year), Louisiana (1.8 Bm3/year), and Oklahoma (1.2 Bm3/year).

Some states rely heavily on groundwater for irrigation.
In the lower 48 states, 19 states rely on groundwater for
Table 2. Fifteen States Experiencing the Lowest Increase
in Irrigated Surfaces, 1974\u20132000 and 1992\u20132000
1974 \u2013 2000
%/year
New Jersey
1.39
Oregon
1.27
Louisiana
1.13
Florida
1.08
Idaho
1.05
California
1.02
Washington
0.70
Colorado
0.65
New Mexico
0.54
Oklahoma
\u22120.06
Texas
\u22120.06
Montana
\u22120.09
Arizona
\u22120.64
Nevada
\u22120.70
Wyoming
\u22120.88
1992 \u2013 2000
%/year
Illinois
1.33
Wisconsin
0.89
Colorado
0.88
Maryland
0.77
Louisiana
0.57
Indiana
0.46
Arizona
0.26
West Virginia
0.00
Oklahoma
\u22120.12
Washington
\u22120.55
South Dakota
\u22120.58
Montana
\u22121.73
Alabama
\u22121.96
Wyoming
\u22122.88
Iowa
\u22123.85

more than 40% of irrigation withdrawals; levels are as high as 49.7% for Montana and 49.1% for Kentucky. On the other hand, 17 states pump less than 30% of their irrigation water from aquifers. Reliance on groundwater is not connected to the size of the withdrawals; states along the lower Mississippi and Missouri basins and around the Great Lakes tend to pump a larger proportion of their irrigation water from surface water.

As a result of the huge withdrawals taking place in the West for irrigation, shares of irrigation water in total freshwater withdrawals (Fig. 7) are nearly always above 60%, except for Kansas (56.3%), Oklahoma (40.7%), Texas (34.8%), and North Dakota (12.7%) (Table 4).

In the eastern United States, the share of irrigation is consistently below 15%, except for Arkansas, Florida, Mississippi, Georgia (17.8%) and Missouri (17.4%), and is less than 1% in 12 states (Indiana, Vermont, Kentucky, Iowa, Virginia, New York, Alabama, Ohio, Tennessee, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, and the District of Columbia). Thus, although it is developing fast in the eastern part of the country and may at times in speci\ufb01c places, represent a problem for water supply in the summertime, irrigation remains by far the major demand sector only in the West. This explains the pressure exerted on ground or surface waterbodies by environmental problems such as the overexploitation (Colorado River)

FREEDOM PALESTINE
http://arab2000.forumpro.fr
Canada
Mexico
0
250 500 km
Irrigated surfaces, in ha
3200 000
45 000
60 000
Figure 3.Irrigated surface per state, 1974.
Canada
Mexico
0
250 500 km
Irrigated surfaces, in ha
4100 000
570 000
90 000
Figure 4.Irrigated surface per state, 2000.
589
FREEDOM PALESTINE
http://arab2000.forumpro.fr
Canada
Mexico
0
250 500 km
Average annual
precipitation (po.= 2.34 cm)
0 \u201310 po.
10\u201320 po.
20\u201330 po.
30\u201340 po.
40+
Figure 5.The dry western United States (1,2).
Canada
Mexico
0
250 500 km
Water withdrawals for
irrigation, 2000 (million
cubic meters (m3) per year)
70 200
43 000
14 400
5 100
1 200
200
40+
Water origin :
Ground
Surface
Figure 6.Water withdrawals for irrigation, 2000.
590
FREEDOM PALESTINE
http://arab2000.forumpro.fr
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...