Read without ads and support Scribd by becoming a Scribd Premium Reader.
See Premium Plans
 
Affidavit Aaron James – Aaron’s Draft (Adam’s Draft Amended)The Queen’s BenchWinnipeg Centre
IN THE MATTER OF:
The Criminal Code of Canada
BETWEEN:
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,-And-
AARON JAMES,
AFFIDAVIT OF AARON JAMESAffirmed the day of March, 2009
I, AARON JAMES, of to City of Winnipeg, in the province of Manitoba,
AFFIRM :
1. THAT I am the Applicant here and as such have personal knowledge of the factsand natters hereinafter deposed to by me, except where same are stated to be basedon information and belief, in which case I verily believe same to be true.2. THAT on October 27, 2007,1 was at my residence at 2 – 390 Stradbrook Ave, Winnipeg,Manitoba. I heard a knock at my door and when I went to the door to ask who it was I wasinformed that the Winnipeg Police service were at the door. The police officers instructed meto open the door and I asked them why. They responded that they had a warrant for my arrest.I called through the door that I did not believe them and they responded that they could easilygo back to their station and write a fake warrant. I informed them that I had no intention of opening the door for them.That officers effected
coercion and uttering of threats
to kick the door down in the event thatI did not open the door, and as such I was coerced into opening the door.3. THAT when I opened my door, I saw many officers, present without warrant or charges, withtheir guns pointed at me ordering me to get down on the ground, constituting
armed assault with a weapon
. I was placed in handcuffs and was seated in the rear of a police cruiser car outside my apartment block, taken out in plain view, without legal grounds, constitutinghumiliation and
defamation of character 
.
 
4.That
 sexual assault with a weapon
was committed upon my person, via a female officer placing her hands inside my pockets while I remained at gun point, to search my pants pockets.
5
. THAT I am advised by counsel for the Applicant and do verily believe that nowa
rrant of arrest existed for the Applicant in relation to a March 8, 2007, incident at theUniversity of Winnipeg nor did a Search Warrant exist for his residence on October 27, 2007.
That I verily believe, the incident referenced March 8/2007 inherently did not substantiate an infractionthat would allow for a warrant to be procured nor for an arrest to be made at one’s home.
That I verily believe, Crown attorney Desaultes denied their application for a charge and that no chargewhat so ever was informationed by police in justifying any of said actions taken by police.
6. THAT on March 8, 2007, police were investigating an incident at the University of Winnipeg wherein I was assaulted by security without grounds. That police inquired aboutlaying a charge upon my person and were instructed by the crown not to do so by Crown MikeDesaultes, as there were no grounds. That police later approached a second Crown attorneyin capacity Dan Angus, who gave authorization to lay a charge of causedisturbance against me. I am advised by my counsel and do verily believe that the charge of cause disturbance pursuant to the Criminal Code is purely a summary offense.7. THAT I am advised by my counsel and do verily believe that police must lay anInformation within six months of the incident date in order to lawfully have thatcharge before the Courts
and that this prerequisite was not satisfied or informationed beforethe court during this period nor at any time, rendering any such charge, invalid.
8. T
hat it is my belief that the police knew or ought to have known that when they attendedmy residence, they had no outstanding charges, nor warrant, nor legal grounds what so ever on which to trespass and commit arrest of my person. That the police entered my suite andsearched in on October 27,07
under these illegal pretexts.
 9. THAT I am advised by my counsel and do verily believe that in fact the police hadno warrant to arrest me nor issue or information of charge with which to act upon my personand no warrant to search my residence.)I asked the police officers to put my wallet back inside my suite and lock the door. I am advisedby my counsel and do verily believe that instead of simply putting the wallet in my suite as Ihad asked them to do, the police searched and photographed my residence and seizedphysical property documents and photos.10. That police committed an illegal warrant-less search and seizure without my consent as aviolation of my rights under the Charter of Right and Freedoms to be free from unreasonablesearch and seizure.
 
11. I am informed and verily believe that police claimed they did not have time to apply for awarrant to search my residence because of ‘
exigent circumstances’
 
,
a term and conditioninconsistent with the conditions under which they claim to have been present at my suite.
12:“That it is my belief that the police’s actions in seizing the saidproperty during an illegal search constitutes a criminal offense and that thepolice committed theft and break, enter commit theft, *assault with aweapon/armed assault, criminal trespass and forcible confinement* on October27,07, in violation of section 8 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms
whichclearly states “Everyone has the right to be secure againstunreasonable search and seizure”. Violation Section 7 of theCharter which “ guarantees every person’s right to life, libertyand the security of the person.”
13.“ That I am advised by counsel and do verily believe that one of the officers, Cnst. Sushnyk who was present on October 27,2007, subsequently was charged with the offense of beingunlawfully in a dwelling house in relation to another unrelated incident lending further evidencetowards misdeed.”
14.
 
That during said illegal confinement, I received repeated threats that police wished of myextradition to the United States in Minneapolis
,
however given extradition has a requisite of felonylevel charges against an individual and since there are no such felony charges against me, Icannot be legally extradited.That threats of continued illegal activity and police harassment were made by Officer Ogwalrepeatedly throughout the course of the day, Oct 27/07.Threats in Winnipeg Police Notes pertaining to my abduction referencing FBI and U.S.Marshals as per “U.S. Marshals handling case…fan out to all U.S. Marshals,…James subject to possible extradition…”That Police referenced their Boss’s directive regarding my extradition amidst taunts therein,while referencing further their affiliation with Minneapolis law enforcement, whom theyclaimed frequented Winnipeg to come in for training, from the U.S.It should be noted and I do verily believe the background of the Winnipeg police chief as per his bio, reads that he is affiliated with Minneapolis law enforcement as president of the NorthwestChapter of Associates FBI, and that consistent with this, threats regarding both FBI and MN based U.S. Marshals are referenced in Winnipeg Police notes.http://winnipeg.ca/police/AboutTheService/chiefmessage.stm 15. That I was held in Illegal confinement by Winnipeg Police acting without charges or awarrant on Oct 27/07 – and that this illegal confinement continued for a period of 8 hours after  police acknowledging that there was no valid charge, for sum total of 12 hours of illegalconfinement concurrent with threats and taunts concerning abduction, while denied food and
Search
Search History:
Searching...
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
  • p.
    • Notes
    Load more