Embed Doc
Copy Link
Readcast
Collections

CommentGo Back

Download

Final Project Rubric for MIT2412GUniversity of Western Ontario, Spring 2009

Criteria Distinguished Proficient Basic Unacceptable

Organization

-- Extremely wellorganized.--Introduces the



purpose of thepresentation clearlyand creatively.

--Effectively includessmooth, clever transitions which aresuccinct but notchoppy in order toconnect key points

-- Student presents



information inlogical, interestingsequence whichaudience can follow.--Ends with an



accurate conclusionshowing thoughtful,strong evaluation of the evidencepresented.-- Generally wellorganized.--Introduces the



purpose of thepresentation clearly.--Include transitions



to connectkey points but bettertransitions from ideato idea are noted.--



Most informationpresented in logicalsequence; A fewminor points may beconfusing--Ends with an



summary of mainpoints showing someevaluation of theevidence presented.-- Somewhatorganized.--Introduces the



purpose of thepresentation--Includes some



transitions toconnect key pointsbut there is difficultyin followingpresentation.-- Student jumps



around topics.Several points areconfusing.--Ends with a



summary orconclusion; littleevidence of evaluating contentbased onEvidence.-- Poor or nonexistent organization.--Does not clearly



introduce thepurpose of thepresentation--Uses ineffective



transitions thatrarely connect points;cannot understandpresentation becausethere is no sequencefor information.

--Presentation ischoppy anddisjointed; noapparent logical order of presentation--Ends without asummary or conclusion.

Final Project Rubric for MIT2412GUniversity of Western Ontario, Spring 2009

Criteria Distinguished Proficient Basic Unacceptable

Content: Depthand AccuracyContent

--Speaker provides anaccurate andcomplete explanationof key concepts andtheories, drawingupon relevantliterature.Applications of theory are included toilluminate issues.--Provides evidence



of extensiveand valid researchwith multiple (youprovide number)and varied sources.--Combines and



evaluates existingideas to form newinsights.

--Informationcompletely accurate;all names and factswere precise andexplicit--For the most part,explanations of concepts and theoriesare accurate andcomplete. Somehelpful applicationsof theory areincluded.

--Presents evidence



of validresearch withmultiple sources.--Combines existing



ideas to formnew insights.

-- No significanterrors are made; afew inconsistenciesor errors ininformation.--Level of presentation is--Explanations of concepts and/or theories areinaccurate or incomplete. Littleattempt is made to tiein theory. There is agreat deal of information that isnot connected to the presentation thesis.

--Presents evidence



of researchwith sources.--Combines existing



ideas.

--Enough errors aremade to distract aknowledgeablelistener, but someinformation isaccurate.--Portions of --No reference ismade to literature or theory. Thesis notclear; informationincluded that does notsupport thesis in anyway.

-Presents little or no



evidence of valid research.

--Shows littleevidence of thecombination of ideas.--Informationincluded issufficiently inaccuratethat the listener cannotdepend on the presentation as asource of accurateinformation.--Presentationconsistently is tooelementary or toosophisticated for the



Level of presentation isappropriate for theaudience.

generally appropriate.presentation are tooelementary or toosophisticated for audience.audience.

of 00

Rubric Final Project

Download or Print

1,951 Reads

Info and Rating

Category:	School Work
Rating:	(4 Ratings)
Upload Date:	03/26/2009
Copyright:	Attribution Non-commercial
Tags:	rubric Presentations hanan kamal eldahry grading guidelines rubric Presentations hanan kamal eldahry grading guidelines (fewer)