Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
5Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Forced Circumcision is Countered by First Exposing the Falseness of Its Supposed Connection to Legality - Amen

Forced Circumcision is Countered by First Exposing the Falseness of Its Supposed Connection to Legality - Amen

Ratings: (0)|Views: 13|Likes:
Forced Circumcision is countered by first exposing the falseness of its supposed connection to legality. Amen
Forced Circumcision is countered by first exposing the falseness of its supposed connection to legality. Amen

More info:

Categories:Types, School Work
Published by: Amen Ronald Oberhollenzer on Apr 18, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

05/16/2013

pdf

text

original

 
 
“Forced Circumcisthe falseness of it
This is“Nulla e„There is no gr
 Ame
ENDORSE
the Universal De
http://www.intacth
 
From the state of N
 
ion is countered by fisupposed connectio
hild Abuse, thus already Outlawed!
 
st maior probatio quam evidentia reieater proof than the evidence of the
Ronald Oberhollenzer, Jerusalem 1976
laration of Demand for Law Enforcement on Fo
umanity.org/declaration-of-RMALITY to the state of 
AB
 
 
st exposingto
legality 
 
thing“
 
rced Circumcision!
emand.html
The CAPTA-DefinitiononChild Abuse
NORMALITY
 
 
We know whatChild Abuseis in psychological, physical, emotional and legal terms.
 
 
We know:Child Abuseis classified as the general mishandling and wrongdoing with regard to a child or an individualconsidered being a minor.Child Abusecan range from neglect to aggravated assault of a child.Child Abusecan be psychological, physical, emotional, and sexual in nature. It can mirror any type of abuse directed at an adult, yet due to thenature of the age(s) of the victim(s), punishment for convicted child abusers are typically severe.
 
We know:
 
infliction of non-accidental injury to a child
 
of any age and gender
 
=
 
Physical
 
Child Abuse
.
We know:
 
Forced Child Circumcision
 
=
 
infliction of non-accidental injury to a child =Physical
 
Child Abuse
.
C
HILD
A
BUSE
= is a
C
RIMINAL
O
FFENSE
that involves the
PHYSICAL
, emotional, or sexual
MISTREATMENT
 
OF
or
I
NFLICTION
 
OF
N
ON
-A
CCIDENTAL
 
INJURY TO A CHILD
committed by a parent or another party if responsible for the child’s welfare or not, eitherpurposefully, or due to neglect.
C
HILD ABUSE
is defined byLiberal Democratic Right State Lawsand is also defined in theUniversal Declaration of Human Rights; in particular in theUniversal Declaration of the Rights of the Child.
 
E.g.: In the USA:
Although State laws vary, the
Federal
 
C
HILD
A
BUSE PREVENTION AND
T
REATMENT
A
CT
(
CAPTA
) requires that Statesincorporate a minimum set of acts or behaviors into their
JURISTIC DEFINITIONS
 
of 
 
CHILD ABUSE
 
and
 
NEGLECT
.
The CAPTA
DEFINITION OF
"
CHILD ABUSE
and
NEGLECT
" refers to: "Any recent act or failure to act on the part of a parent orcaretaker or any other person, which results in death,
SERIOUS PHYSICAL 
or
EMOTIONALHARM
, sexual abuse, or exploitation, or
ANACT OR FAILURE TO ACT WHICH PRESENTS AN IMMINENT RISK OF SERIOUS HARM
".
 
We know
every adult citizen in any democratic right state law society has the legal obligation to report any form of Child Abuseupon knowledge or suspicion of such an act to the state-authority.
We know
it is a violation of law to not report Child Abuse to the state-authority.
We know
the Child Mutilators and the General Public and even the State-Authority is acting as if this >Infliction of Non-Accidental Injury to the Male-Child’s Genital< were a state secured right.
We know
if we report >Forced Male Child Circumcision< to the authority, that the authority - due to the dire fact that also theauthority sees this act as “legal-act” - refuses to enforce the current law which has also this >infliction of preventable injurydone to any child of any age and gender< outlawed.
We know
not to be impressed by the child-mutilators claim and the public´s and authority´s Complicity in this FALLACY inthinking that what is done to the child were a state guaranteed right to >inflict non-therapeutic foreskinectomy<, and in this to>violate the state guaranteed right of the child of equal protection< from any >infliction of non-accidental injury and otherharm<.
We know
the Principle of Liberal Democracy and the Concept of The Rule of Law obligates the Authority to act upon knowledgeor suspicion of any form of Child Abuse no matter of the Abusers Motive.
We DEMAND from STATE-AUTHORITY to ENFORCE the LAW on FORCED CIRCUMCISION.
 
 
The CAPTA
DEFINITION OF
"
CHILD ABUSE
and
NEGLECT
" refers to:
"Any recent act or failure to act on the part of a parentor caretaker or any other person, which results in death,
SERIOUS PHYSICAL 
or
EMOTIONAL HARM
,sexual abuse, or exploitation, or
AN ACT OR FAILURE TO ACTWHICH PRESENTS AN IMMINENT RISK OF SERIOUS HARM
".
 

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->