Pakistan in America's War against Terrorism: Strategic Ally or Unreliable Client

 
 
 
 
 
Value This
Doc
Scribd
Average
     
Pages: 22 43
Words: 13382 13640
Characters: 86989 81678
Lines: 203 623
     
     
Letters per word: 6.5 5.99
Words per line: 65.92 21.89
Words per page: 608.27 317.21

Add to your reading list

Flag_red Flag this document

Document Information

573 Reads | 2 Comments

Description

Executive Summary

The September 11 attacks on New York and

Washington and the ensuing U.S.-led war on terrorism

have given Pakistan's military dictator,

Gen. Pervez Musharraf, an opportunity to

improve the relationship between Washington

and Islamabad. That relationship had experienced

a steep decline in the 1990s, as the end of both the

Cold War and the common struggle against the

Soviet occupation of Afghanistan eroded the perception

of shared strategic interests. Moreover,

while it was losing its strategic significance to the

United States, Pakistan was coming under the

control of an assertive military-religious nexus

that promoted anti-American radical Islamic

forces at home and abroad.



Since September 11, General Musharraf,

whose regime had been the main source of diplomatic

and military support for the terrorist

Taliban ruling neighboring Afghanistan, has portrayed

his regime as an ally of Washington in its

counterterrorism campaign. Musharraf, though,

headed a military clique that brought an end to

his nation's short democratic experience, assisted

radical Islamic terrorist groups in Afghanistan

and Kashmir, pressed for a war with India,

advanced Pakistan's nuclear weapons program,

and presided over a corrupt and mismanaged

economy. Despite that record, he is being hailed

by the Bush administration as a "courageous" and

"visionary" leader who is ready to reorient his

country toward a pro-American position and

adopt major political and economic reforms. In

exchange for his belated support, Musharraf has

been rewarded with U.S. diplomatic backing and

substantial economic aid.



Musharraf's decision to join the U.S. war on terrorism

didn't reflect a structural transformation in

Pakistan's policy. It was a result of tactical considerations

aimed at limiting the losses that Islamabad

would suffer because of the collapse of the friendly

Taliban regime in Kabul. Rejecting cooperation

with Washington would have provoked American

wrath and placed at risk Pakistan's strategic and

economic interests in South Asia.



Some cooperation between the United States

and Pakistan is necessary to wage the war against

terrorism, but that cooperation must not evolve

into a new long-term strategic alliance.

Washington should view Pakistan, with its dictatorship,

failed economy, and insecure nuclear arsenal,

as a reluctant supporter of U.S. goals at best

and as a potential long-term problem at worst.

Pdf_16x16 22 Pages


Date Added

03/26/2009

Category

Uncategorized.

Tags
Groups
Copyright

Attribution Non-commercial

More info »

 

or use Facebook Connect

usmanehmad

Unreliable client? Bastards! Show the world you can win in Afghanistan without us. *******! You can NEVER!

11 / 18 / 2009