• Embed Doc
  • Copy Link
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
STATE OF FLORIDA34th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT
10|DEADPOOLCase No.: 07-97435-CVJudge: Charles T. WellsPlaintiff,v.OLD FARTS OF AMERICA, INCOFOA FIREDOCDefendants. ______________________________/
COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
Plaintiff, 10|DEADPOOL, by and through his undersigned counsel, file thisComplaint against OLD FARTS OF AMERICA, INC. and OFOA FIREDOC (hereinafter collectively the “Defendants”), states as follows:JURISDICTION and VENUE1.Plaintiff 10|DEAPOOL (hereinafter “Deadpool”) is a resident of the city of Jacksonville, Duval County, Florida.2. Defendant OLD FARTS OF AMERICA, INC (hereinafter “OFOA”) is acorporation incorporated in OFOA, Server.3. Defendant OFOA FIREDOC (hereinafter the “Firedoc”), is a resident of OFOA,Server.4. The events giving rise to this cause of action occurred in OFOA Server.5. The amount in controversy exceeds $25,000.00.6.Subject Matter Jurisdiction and Venue are proper in this court.VIOLATION OF RECOGNTION OF COD4 SKILLS OF PLAINTIFF1
 
7. On the evening of March 26, 2009, Plaintiff was enjoying a game of COD4 onOFOA server.8.Plaintiff was pwning Defendant and other players on OFOA server.9.Plaintiff notified Defendant that his skills were superior to the other players.10.Defendant Firedoc replied that he would recognize Plaintiff’s skills if he couldreproduce his number one finish in two more rounds.11.The next map that loaded was Wet Works.12.Plaintiff continued to own Defendant Firedoc and other players.13.Plaintiff was using the P90 SMG and was patrolling / roaming the map.14.During the latter portion of the round Defendant Firedoc shot and killed Plaintiff.15.Plaintiff spawned and knifed Defendant Firedoc where he remained.16.Plaintiff then ran around a truck and found Defendant Firedoc standing and killedhim again.17.Defendant Firedoc alleged that Plaintiff was spawn killing18.Plaintiff questioned why Defendant Firedoc would defame Plaintiff in such amanner 19.Defendant Firedoc replied “You killed me twice in a row.”20.Plaintiff was threatened with removal from the server.21.Plaintiff then disparaged Defendants and removed himself from the server.22. Plaintiff’s enjoyment of the OFOA server has been diminished.23.Plaintiff’s reputation has been diminished amongst OFOA players and members.22.Plaintiff demands restitution in the form of (a) judgment against Defendant for theamount in excess of $25,000, together with interests and costs, or (b) an apology messagestreamed in OFOA server at a frequency not fewer than 5 times per 10 minutes2
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...