• Embed Doc
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
612
CHAPTER
18
TRIZ
James E. McMunigal
MCM AssociatesLong Beach, California
Steven Ungvari
Strategic Product Innovations, Inc.Columbus, Ohio
Michael Slocum
Breakthrough Management GroupLongmont, Colorado
Ruth E. McMunigal
MCM AssociatesLong Beach, California1 WHAT IS TRIZ? 6132 ORIGINS OF TRIZ 613
2.1 Altshullers First Discovery 6132.2 Altshuller’s Second Discovery 6132.3 Altshullers Third Discovery 6142.4 Altshuller’s Levels of Inventiveness 614
3 BASIC FOUNDATIONALPRINCIPLES 615
3.1 Ideality 6153.2 Contradictions 6163.3 Technical Contradictions 6173.4 Physical Contradictions 6173.5 Maximal Use of Resources 617
4 A SCIENTIFIC APPROACH 618
4.1 How TRIZ Works 6194.2 Five Requirementsfor a Solutionto be Inventive 622
5 CLASSICAL AND MODERNTRIZ TOOLS 622
5.1 Contradiction Matrix 6225.2 Physical Contradictions 6245.3 Formulating and SolvingPhysical Contradictions 6245.4 An Example 6245.5 Laws of Systems Evolution 6255.6 Analytical Tools 6265.7 Su-Field 626
6 PROBLEMS WITHOUTCONTRADICTIONS 6287 RULES FOR THE INVENTOR:SU-FIELD SYNTHESIS 6298 CLASS 4: MEASUREMENT ANDDETECTION STANDARDS 6309 ALGORITHM FOR INVENTIVEPROBLEM SOLVING 635
9.1 Steps in ARIZ 635
10 CAVEAT 63911 CONCLUSION 639BIBLIOGRAPHY 641
 Mechanical Engineers’ Handbook: Materials and Mechanical Design, Volume 1, Third Edition.
EditedbyMyerKutzCopyright
2006 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
 
2 Origins of TRIZ
6131 WHAT IS TRIZ?
TRIZ is the acronym for the Russian words
Teoriya Resheniya Izobretatelskikh Zadatch
(Theory of the Solution of Inventive Problems). TRIZ’s development, evolution, and refine-ment covers over 50 years of rigorous, empirically based analysis.The creativity and innovation mentioned within the context of science are rare. Typically,creativity and innovation are considered spontaneous phenomena occurring in a capriciousand unpredictable way. Individuals such as Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci, and ThomasEdison appear to have possessed innate, natural ability for creative thought and inventiveness.What characteristics enabled them, or anyone, to perform as a highly creative thinker?The term
theory to the solution of inventive problems
implies there is an innovation and/ or creative thought process (supported by an underlying construct and architecture) that canbe deployed on an as-needed basis. The implications of such a theory, if true, are enormous,suggesting that technicians can elevate their creative thinking abilities by orders of magnitudewhen the need arises.
2 ORIGINS OF TRIZ
The catalyst for TRIZ was a Russian named Genrich Altshuller (1926–1998). His interestin inventions began at an early age, patenting a device for generating oxygen from hydrogenperoxide by age 14. Altshuller’s fascination with inventions and innovation continued throughStalin’s regime and World War II. After the war, he was assigned as a patent examiner forthe Department of the Navy. He found himself helping would-be inventors solve variousproblems with their inventions. Over time, Altshuller became fascinated with the study of inventions and understanding how their inventors’ minds worked. His initial attempts werepsychologically based; however, these probes provided little if any insight on how creativitycould be ‘‘engineered.’’Altshuller turned his attention to studying inventions and reverse engineering them tounderstand the essential engineering problem being solved and the elegance of the solutionas described in the patent application. Patent applications, called Author Certificates (ACs)in the former Soviet Union, were concise documents of three to four pages. The AC consistedof a descriptive title of the invention, a schematic of the new invention, a rendering of thecurrent design, the purpose of the invention, and a description of the solution.
2.1 Altshuller’s First Discovery
The brevity of the ACs facilitated analysis, cataloguing, and mapping of solutions to theproblems. As the number of inventors applying for an AC increased, Altshuller uncoveredsimilar patterns of solutions for similar problems. He developed a scientific, standardizedapproach to a problem and incorporated a latent knowledge base as an integral element of the solution process when he recognized that similar technological problems gave rise tosimilar patents. This phenomenon was repeated in widely disparate engineering disciplines,in various geographical areas, during different time frames.Altshuller postulated the possibility of creating a mechanism for describing ‘‘types’’ of problems and mapping them to types of solutions. This led to a mechanism naming the 39typical engineering parameters, the contradiction matrix, and 40 inventive principles.
2.2 Altshuller’s Second Discovery
As Altshuller assembled chronological technology maps, he uncovered regularity in the ev-olution of engineered systems. He described these time-based phenomena as ‘‘laws’’ and
 
614
TRIZ
LevelNature ofsolutionNumber oftrials to findthe solutionOrigin ofthe solution% of patentsat this level1ParametricNone to fewThe designer’sfield of specialty32%2Significantimprovement inparadigm10–50Within a branchof technology45%3Inventivesolution inparadigmHundredsSeveral branchesof technology18%4Inventivesolution outof paradigmThousands totens ofthousandsFrom science—physical/chemicaleffects4%5True discoveryMillionsBeyondcontemporaryscience1%
Figure 1
Altshuller’s levels of inventiveness.
called them the
eight laws of engineered systems evolution
. The term laws does not implythat they conform to a strict scientific construction as one would describe in the field of physics or chemistry. The laws, though general in nature, are recognizable, and predictableand provide a road map to future derivatives. Today, these eight laws have been expandedinto more than 400 ‘‘sublines’’ of evolution and are useful in technology development, prod-uct planning, and the establishment of defensible patent fences.
2.3 Altshuller’s Third Discovery
The third truism that emerged was the realization that inventions are vastly different in theirdegree of ‘‘inventiveness.’’ Indeed, many of the patents he studied were filed to describe asystem and provide some degree of protection. These patents were useless to Altshuller’sdetermination for discovering the secret of how an inventor reaches the highest order. Todifferentiate inventiveness, he devised a scale of 1–5 for categorizing the elegance of thesolution. See Fig. 1.Only levels 3 and 4 solutions are deemed ‘‘inventive.’’ Within the body of TRIZ knowl-edge, ‘‘inventive’’ states that the solution was one that did not compromise conflicting re-quirements. For example, strength versus weight is an example of conflicting parameters. Toincrease strength, the engineer will typically make something thicker or heavier. An inventivesolution would increase strength with no additional weight or even a reduction in weight.
2.4 Altshuller’s Levels of Inventiveness
 Level 1: Parametric Solution
A solution utilizing well-known methods and parameters within an engineering field of spe-cialty is the lowest level solution and is not an inventive solution. For example, a problemwith roads and bridges icing over can be solved with the application of salt or sand.
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...