3
But because a moderate percentage of children have developmental or behavioral problems, aphysician requires solid strategies for determining if a child has an important lag or problem indevelopment. The majority of children with developmental problems are not detected withoutstandardized screening tests. Informal "eyeballing" of children and informal questioning of parents do not work well. There is a good chance of missing problems because of the need of looking at multiple domains in development. A physician asking about walking and other motorskills may miss language and other cognitive deficits. Research from Great Britain where clinicalimpression is used rather than screening tests is revealing. It has been found that only about half the children who need to be identified are found using physician clinical impression without adevelopmental screening instrument (5). Also, asking questions about developmental milestoneswithout a screening tool finds less than 30% of children with developmental conditions (6).Therefore several instruments have been developed to increase identifying children withproblems. These tools should be used on whole populations of children as to not miss childrenwith subtle (and sometimes not so subtle) problems. Children need to be identified early so thatproblems can be managed properly. Goals of early management include optimizing the child'sdevelopment, and supporting families with these children well.The Denver II is a very popular screening tool used in the United States and worldwide. It wasdeveloped by Dr. William Frankenburg at the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center inDenver. It is an example of a "hands on" screening tool that also allows for parental report forselected items. However, most of the items require direct observation of the child trying to docertain tasks. There are 125 tasks arranged in four domains: personal-social, fine motor-adaptive,language and gross motor. However, only a few items in each domain are required to screen aparticular child at a selected age. It has several advantages including ease of administration,coverage of a good range of age groups to screen (from birth to about 6 years of age), and anormative sample that includes diversification of race, place of residence (urban, suburban, rural)and the mother's educational level (7). There are also very few screening tests that take less time(although clinicians still balk at the 20 minute administration time).One type of screening that is growing in popularity, and bolstered by recent research findings is astandardized parent questionnaire. Parents' concerns about children are important. Someconcerns, particularly with parental worries regarding speech-language, emotional, behavioral,fine motor and global problems were highly predictive of true problems (5). Concerns about theaccuracy and bias of parent reporting, parent reading level, and their understanding of conceptsregarding the standardized parent screening tools have not been shown to be major problemsafter research has been done regarding these tools. (6).The PEDS (Parents' Evaluation of Developmental Status) is a recently developed and wellresearched example of a standardized parental questionnaire. Parents complete the 10 itemquestionnaire in the waiting room. It takes about two minutes for the clinician to interpret thequestionnaire. The PEDS can guide the clinician in getting particular history from the parentsand guide what elements to include on the exam. The interpretation also helps guide the clinicianin whether to use a hands-on screening tool, give parental reassurance, monitor the child, ormake specific referrals to other specialists (6).
Leave a Comment