• Embed Doc
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • 1
    CommentGo Back
Download
 
A. Women are facing many barriers to access reproductive healthcareFiner LB,
Henshaw
SK. Abortion
incidence and services in the United States
in 2000.
Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
, 2003
NAF 2006
The U.S. Supreme Court confirmed a woman's right to choose abortion in 1973, and thecourts have upheld the core of that finding in subsequent cases. In 1988, the SupremeCourt of Canada struck down laws prohibiting abortion. But access to abortion has beenseverely eroded. The most recent survey found that 87% of all U.S. counties have noidentifiable abortion provider. In non-metropolitan areas, the figure rises to 97%. 
1
 As aresult, many women must travel long distances to reach the nearest abortion provider.But distance is not the only barrier women face. In the U.S., many other factors havecontributed to the current state of abortion access, including a shortage of trainedabortion providers; state laws that make getting an abortion more complicated than ismedically necessary; state and federal Medicaid restrictions; and fewer hospitalsproviding abortion services.
In Canada, even though there is no law restricting abortion, access to abortion care remains a problem for many women. There is a shortage of trained abortion providers; abortions are not fully funded in all provinces and territories; funded abortions are unavailable in some areas, thereis no inter-provincial billing for abortions; and in some provinces there are limits on the number of abortions allowed in facilities in a given year
In addition, women from diverse backgrounds face unique cultural and informationbarriers to obtaining information about pregnancy options and safe, high quality abortioncare. Many also lack knowledge about navigating the health care system or areunaccustomed to and anxious about interacting with health care professionals.
 
A. Abortion is constantly condemned through rhetoric and language destroying feminismTrish
Wilson of The womens network is the editor at large for feminista
. Works for the Coalition for Parents and Families which is an organization which focused on pending welfare reform legislation. She is also part of the National Writer's Union
"WOMAN'S RIGHT TO CHOOSE FOLLOWING NOW v. SCHEIDLER" 2006
 The use of language to condemn both feminism and abortion itself was employed andencouraged. Dawn Stover, an activist with Advocates for Life Ministries, while speakingat a group fund-raiser, had advised parents who had brought their children to the fund-raiser to tell their children that abortion rights protesters were "sodomites" and the"mouths of Satan."
In a means identical to what I described in my earlier piece about anti-feminist propaganda ["Not The 'F' Word,"Feminista!, Feb. 8, 1998.], PLAN's Joseph Schiedler, who was called the "Green Beret of the pro-life movement" by
Pat Buchanan,resorted to both name-calling and euphemism in his book "Closed: 99 Ways To StopAbortion." He emphasized the use of specific language. As reported by Faludi, "... whenspeaking to the press, his manual instructed, Rarely use the word 'fetus.' Use 'baby' or 'unborn child.' ... You don't have to surrender to their vocabulary ... They will start usingyour terms if you use them. Schiedler also prefers the use of other "inflammatoryrhetoric" that pro-lifers (a name that is a bit of propaganda itself, since anyone whodisagrees with their stance is automatically rendered "pro-death.") must use "... atappropriate times to counter pro-abortion jargon are; 'holocaust,' for America's abortionculture, 'abortuary' or 'death camp,' to describe the abortion clinic, 'abortifacient,' for pillsand IUDs, 'fornication,' for sex outside of marriage, 'adultery,' for 'having an affair.”How about "hypocrites" and "woman-haters" for the anti-abortionists? Oh, my mistake.The technique is supposed to mask the truth, not bring it out.B.
Being Pro-Life destroys the Feminist MovementKate
Michelman, Former head of the NARAL Pro-choice of America
, January 8,20
06
; in an interview with Tim Russert, Meet the Press, NBC; page lexis.You can’t be a feminist and oppose the act of abortion on moral and ethical, religiousand personal grounds on face value; absolutely cannot be. Many people who are pro-life should respect the diversity of views on these issues related to pregnancy andchildbearing, abortion, and reproductive matters, that there is a diversity of viewsand they are informed by one's values, as they are mine. My personal valuesinformed my decision about abortion. But you can be absolutely anti-abortion, if youwill, and pro-choice; believing that women ultimately, not the government, notDennis Hastert and Tom DeLay and Bill Frist, but women themselves must determinethe course of their lives, and central to that determining the course of their lives isdetermining when and under what circumstances they will become mothers. Because
 
the thing that most women want is to be successful at mothering. And the firstingredient is being able to determine when that time is right and not being forced bythe government and by politicians or by judges to bear a child under circumstancesof one--not of one's choosing. 
C. Upholding Roe v. Wade is the only way to access feminism
Rajesh
Jain, Cavalier Daily
; SOURCE: U. Virginia
2006
 http://web.lexis-nexis.com/universe/document?_m=f3461c93c417bcba9884b445f8534012&_docnum=18&wchp=dGLbVlz-zSkVA&_md5=eb477233f3c5d38bc458b25152b413fcBefore Roe v. Wade, money was a woman's surest way to an abortion. Doctors whoperformed abortion illegally charged considerable amounts because of the risk thedoctors were taking if caught. Others received an abortion through a loophole inmany state laws.
If it was deemed by a psychiatric evaluation that the woman in question was in danger of causing damage to herself, an abortion could be completed. Again
, this loophole was only available tothe wealthy who could afford psychiatric consultations. Those without this wealthwere forced into finding other options. In addition, a study done by Mark Graber of Princeton University shows discrimination against minorities in Pre-Roe v. Wadetimes.
For example in New York City, pregnant white women were five times more likely to have illegal hospitalabortions than black women and 26 times more likely to have illegal hospital abortions than pregnant PuertoRican women. Granted
, both minorities have made significant strides since Roe v. Wadethat would curb these disparities, but disparities in health care for minorities stillexists. Likely, these disparities would increase if abortion is made illegal, but by howmuch is not clear. Overall, overturning Roe v. Wade would make illegal, sometimesdangerous abortions prevalent among American women. They would discriminateagainst lower economic classes and minorities who would not receive equalhealthcare. Pro-life protesters would feel cheated by those seeking abortions in otherstates, pro-choice protesters would be outraged, and desperate, confused womenwould suffer with infection, sterility, and death. Nobody wins.
A.
NAF provides availability to reproductive health careFiner LB,
Henshaw SK. Abortion incidence and services in the United States
in 2000.
Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
, 2003
NAF 2006
 Ensuring that every woman has access to the full range of reproductive health careoptions, including abortion, is an integral part of NAF's work. Increasing access beginswith training more clinicians to provide abortion services and extends to fightingrestrictions in legislatures throughout the country.The National Abortion Federation's Access Initiative Project was created specifically toaddress the escalating problem of limited access to abortion in the U.S. The AccessInitiative Project works with medical residency programs, educational institutions, healthcare professionals, legal experts, public policy organizations, and organizations for
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
11 / 27 / 2010<span class="translation_missing">en_US, this_document_made_it_onto_the</span>Rising List!
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...