More From This User
Related Docuements
Seattle Streetcar Network - Report - May Rev
Seattle Streetcar Network - Report - May Rev
From trellis
C.3. Indicators of Relative Credit AvailabilityPercent____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Refused orNumber of farm loan referrals to:Average reduced a Activelyloan-to- Loan-to-deposit ratio farm loan seekingCorrespondent banks Nonbank agenciesdeposit because of newratio, Lower At Higher a shortage farmCompared with Compared withend of than desired than of loanable loanyear earlier year earlierQuarter quarter desired level desired funds accountsNone Lower Same Higher None Lower Same Higher____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Seventh (Chicago) Federal Reserve District (IL*,IN*, IA, MI*, WI*)____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________2001: Q2... | 75 46 34 20 n.a. n.a.n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.Q3... | 75 48 33 19 n.a. n.a.n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.Q4... | 73 52 34 14 n.a. n.a.n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 2002: Q1... | 73 54 30 16 n.a. n.a.n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.Q2... | 75 50 33 17 n.a. n.a.n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.Q3... | 76 50 30 20 n.a. n.a.n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.Q4... | 73 56 27 17 n.a. n.a.n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 2003: Q1... | 72 59 27 14 n.a. n.a.n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.Q2... | 73 62 27 11 n.a. n.a.n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Tenth (Kansas City) Federal Reserve District (CO, KS,MO*, NE, NM*, OK, WY)____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________2001: Q2... | 70 58 7 33 1 72
85 7 89 4 77 9 84 7Q3... | 71 56 9 34 1 7183 7 89 4 78 6 86 8Q4... | 69 59 8 32 0 7485 6 90 4 77 8 86 6 2002: Q1... | 71 56 11 33 0 7183 5 90 5 73 6 77 17Q2... | n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 5 n.a.n.a. 6 92 2 n.a. 5 85 9Q3... | n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 2 n.a.n.a. 4 94 2 n.a. 3 85 11Q4... | n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 1 n.a.n.a. 4 92 4 n.a. 4 85 11 2003: Q1... | n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 2 n.a.n.a. 4 94 2 n.a. 4 79 16Q2... | n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 1 n.a.n.a. 3 95 1 n.a. 3 88 9____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Eleventh (Dallas) Federal Reserve District(LA*, NM*, TX)____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________2001: Q2... | 58 n.a. n.a. n.a. 2 n.a.n.a. 12 79 9 n.a. 10 72 18Q3... | 60 n.a. n.a. n.a. 1 n.a.n.a. 11 83 6 n.a. 11 78 11Q4... | 56 n.a. n.a. n.a. 3 n.a.n.a. 9 85 6 n.a. 8 81 112002: Q1... | 58 n.a. n.a. n.a. 0 n.a.n.a. 10 85 5 n.a. 11 76 13Q2... | 59 n.a. n.a. n.a. 0 n.a.n.a. 11 81 9 n.a. 13 78 9Q3... | 60 n.a. n.a. n.a. 0 n.a.n.a. 10 81 9 n.a. 9 82 9Q4... | 60 n.a. n.a. n.a. 0 n.a.n.a. 9 83 8 n.a. 10 79 112003: Q1... | 59 n.a. n.a. n.a. 0 n.a.n.a. 7 87 6 n.a. 4 87 9Q2... | 60 n.a. n.a. n.a. 0 n.a.n.a. 9 83 8 n.a. 7 83 10____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________35
C.3. Indicators of Relative Credit Availability (continued)Percent____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Refused orNumber of farm loan referrals to:Average reduced a Activelyloan-to- Loan-to-deposit ratio farm loan seekingCorrespondent banks Nonbank agenciesdeposit because of newratio, Lower At Higher a shortage farmCompared with Compared withend of than desired than of loanable loanyear earlier year earlierQuarter quarter desired level desired funds accountsNone Lower Same Higher None Lower Same Higher____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Ninth (Minneapolis) Federal Reserve District (MI*,MN, MT, ND, SD, WI*)____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________2001: Q2... | 71 64 12 23 1 n.a.n.a. 9 85 6 n.a. 12 82 6Q3... | 76 55 11 35 6 n.a.n.a. 11 84 4 n.a. 7 86 7Q4... | 73 70 8 23 1 n.a.n.a. 10 86 4 n.a. 10 81 102002: Q1... | n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 3 n.a.n.a. 4 92 4 n.a. 16 80 4Q2... | n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 2 n.a.n.a. 8 86 7 n.a. 7 84 9Q3... | n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 1 n.a.n.a. 7 91 2 n.a. 6 90 4Q4... | n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 3 n.a.n.a. 5 91 4 n.a. 5 88 72003: Q1... | n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 2 n.a.n.a. 11 83 6 n.a. 9 80 11Q2... | n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 0 n.a.n.a. 8 88 4 n.a. 8 88 5____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Fifth (Richmond) Federal Reserve District (MD,NC, SC, VA, WV*)____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________2001: Q2... | 78 61 32 6 0 7283 3 13 0 77 3 17 3Q3... | 74 68 28 4 0 7278 0 22 0 74 0 22 4Q4... | 74 56 37 7 0 71
of 00
US Federal Reserve: afdr c3
120 Reads
Info and Rating
| Category: | Uncategorized. |
| Rating: | |
| Upload Date: | 01/23/2008 |
| Copyright: | Attribution Non-commercial |
| Tags: |
Leave a Comment