fern :<)

Published March 30th, 2009 RIAA , american jury , berkmania , family , lessig , rhetorical space 0 Comments

you may be wrong but you are dug inhere’s the audio of fern twittering into my lifePage 1 of 28eon3/30/2009http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/nesson/

Forwarded conversationSubject: xox————————From: Charles NessonDate: Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 6:32 AMTo: Fern Nessonmarch 29, 2009sub base mixfern is scared for meshe sees me confronted once again seemingly by the wall of authoritylessig dismisses meterry fisher duking it out with methe master of advanced ipand wendy selter weighing in with her discomfortat the idea that fair use should be something kids can understandshould be a principle that parents can teachthe argument for fair use from joel’s point of viewfrom the point of view of kid s growing up trying to figure out how the world works, how thedigital world works, how the real world works, both, a principle they can understandor do we only need to teach them that power counts, lw power, lobbying power, litigating powerthe best of the army of advocates that argues for fair use admit they can find no principle a kidcould understandit seems to be in the nature of expertize to take an adult point of view but on this issue inparticular it is the viewpoint of the kids that should count, unless we think the lesson that theymost need to learn is response to threat, response to power.locked in the bars of a copyright prison andforced by a three strike rule administered by your isp or by your universitysony is our biblethe burden of proof on the copyright holderthe burden of proof terry fisher says i’m not crazythank you terrythis does seem to be a question on many peoples mindsso yes, one can see in the battle of credibility terry take a step back now larryhe said a thousand timesso if he said this he must know the answerunless he’s saying that what he says is true across the boardPage 2 of 28eon3/30/2009http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/nesson/

no case in which the downloading of music for personal enjoyment would be considered fairfair in what contextfair in the balance between the power of copyright and the power of peoplelittle peopleall the way down to sasha and max, nico and charlieokay, think along in lawwe are asking law to take the user’s point of viewwe are asserting that the leaders of the law in the opinions of the supreme court as opposed to , inopposition to many opinions coming up from belowand yes, it comes directly together with nullification. the premise of fair use as an instrument inlaw is that you can speak directly to the jurywhat is the fairness of imposing copyright on children from the child’s point of viewzittrain is to describe the future of an extended copyright worldbrian message to extend the vision of a future for music in the digital world with a differentassumption about sharingi would like to share our debate with the court and the existing world. it is a debate we should behaving. so far the folks who speak for children have not adequately represented themfeel myself move into dangerous territory in playing with the form of communication with thecourt and with my opponents. feel the wisdom of consulting closely with matt.fear knot my love:<)———-From: Fern NessonDate: Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 8:18 AMTo: nesson at law.harvard.edusounds great. i like where you’re going.–——when appropriate (in my judgment) to an open project and not sensitive (in my judgment) in termsof privacy, i may post email to my blog. all privacy requests respected.Forwarded conversationSubject: Re: expert reports+————————From: Charles NessonDate: Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 7:45 AMTo: Lawrence Lessig , Jonathan Zittrain , John Perry Barlow , Wendy Seltzer , John Palfrey ,William Fisher , Johan Pouwelse , Barton BeebePage 3 of 28eon3/30/2009http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/nesson/