• Embed Doc
  • Copy Link
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
 Mind Travelers
Will we be able to travel the universe with our mind in the future?
In this article I am going to write about a topic that relates to an issue that might not at allseem rational to most people, mind traveling. This is a topic that explores the mind to a muchfurther degree to what most people are accustomed to. My writing as an author and explorer of life relates to the study of the mind and how we come to perceive life and reality. I reallyhave only just touched the surface in explaining how I obtain information and experiencesrelating to these topics, so far only really isolating topics that fall within the materialisticapproach, showing the formation of the dimensions in material space in relation to the mindand the core of creation in articles such as:Spatial Dynamics and Multidimensional PerceptionStrung up on String TheoryWhat is the mind?Do past and future really exist?And other articles…And also in my books I go into much more depth about the formation of space in relation tothe mind, in ‘Creation Theory Revised’and‘The Mind and Matter’. In my first book, Creation Theory Revised, I highlighted on a topic about Time Travel andhow I perceive the working of this cannot be achieved within our material space. In thisarticle I will write more about this topic, showing why I do not really have an affiliation withTime Travel, but perceive more within Mind Travel, an approach that is not as well regardedas the materialistic approach.When we look at the fundamentals of Time Travel we immediately think of a person steppinginto a machine and he or she is transported to another time line of our past or future. We look at life so far in our perception as having a beginning and an end, and that time does have astrict line of vision. Time travel is a concept invented on a materialistic approach, viewinglife only through physical means and in my opinion it fails to identify the soul of anindividual and their mind within the equation.When we think of time travel, we look to such movies as ‘Back to the Future’ and ‘TimeMachine’, and we consider the effects we would have on time if it were to be seen in a strictline of vision. That if we were to go into the past we would ultimately change and affect thefuture for the whole of our reality. This illogical approach does not really have any strong
 
footing to stand on when viewing life from the core of reality and the construction of thedimensions of space. It is to me just an approach seen from a purely materialistic visionarywho wants or hopes to change parts of their life that they do not agree with. The conceptwould have originally been created out of a desire to want to change the past of an experiencethat a person wishes had never occurred. Basically it is linear thought that develops suchconcepts, saying that time is a foundational construct of reality itself. Time is notfoundational, it is subjective and a result of creation itself, not the reason for it forming in theway that it does.Our mind so far within our world as human sees life through a direct vision of time, in a verymaterialistic way. We can only so far relate to the space around us through material laws andthrough our physical experiences, and we are only now starting to explore the bigger picturesand question where thought and consciousness actually comes from. We know that we physically perceive our world, but we so far wonder at the magnificence of thought and whereit comes from and find it hard to rationalize the space to where we exist. One cannot think athought into creation, when thought is the creation itself, and this is the confused state of our conscious perception at this point in time in our studies of consciousness and reality.Where does thought come from? This is the reality we are now just touching the surface,when researching consciousness and the mind. The mind in my opinion is another totallyseparate component of reality than material matter itself. It is force defined on a vacuum thatis not linking at all to consciousness or awareness in its true foundation and original form, justas material matter itself when it is broken down into the purest state of light. It is thecombination of these two elements that defines consciousness, not one or the other singularly.The foundations (or creator elements) of creation are not defined on the laws of consciousness, but are what ‘create’ the conscious state to which we now exist within. Theydefine consciousness but are not consciousness when seen in their separated nature. It is thenin consciousness that we then look to define the laws of creation from a point of view that isalready in creation. This is where it becomes complex for us to comprehend the formation of reality in a logical way and we find that we cannot avoid the barriers of material limitationwhen taking into consideration the reason for why we are here.How can a person define creation, within creation, from a standpoint that can view throughthe eyes of all that is, from the standpoint of where they perceive God to hold the reins? Tomost this would seem a lunacy to even think that such a thing is possible. People then attemptto try and do this and only end up thinking that the mind is all that is and that it creates thewhole of their reality, which is not fundamentally true. The reason this is not true is that themind itself is not thought or consciousness, it is the motivation of material space with the useof the mind that creates thought, defined on force. This means that the mind is not the only parameter that we are working with within creation itself creating our consciousness, and thatthere are material parameters also involved, that form from light. Consciousness itself has amaterial component also within its makeup in order to be seen as physically interactive.When creation is understood perfectly from the core of its formation it then can be understood by all foundationally through the eyes of all that is possible. This is achievable and every being within creation can become aware and understand the fundamental laws of life andreality. In fact the evidence is all around us now, the byproduct of the union of mind andmatter is very clear to see, but it is only that we are not yet aware of the link between the mindand matter itself in order to piece everything into place. Creation is systematic and can belogically approached but only when we can reason illogical circumstances to be possible.
 
Such illogical circumstances as non-matter and zero point. Only then can we understand thefull thrust and flow of creation itself and determine how we can utilize our space to a muchgreater degree than we are now, only viewing reality through a materialistic approach.Force is an underlying invisible component of reality that stands within matter itself. It is thecomponent of reality that does not have a defined point to where it is perceived to come from,only that it is the core balancing point of all matter at its essence. It seems to just appear outof thin air to be forming the space to which we see and that when we focus on reality it all of a sudden materializes matter into existence. No, reality does not at all work in this way, onlyin our three dimensional perception do we see it this way. All formation already exists and itis just that within our own point of perception within reality we become aware of certainthings that we did not before. I wrote an article about this relating to what we find relevant inour world:RelevanceThings become relevant to our perception when we finally notice that they exist. That is therestrictive component of reality itself that all points in space that are materialized can onlyvisualize in this singular approach. We can only truly focus on one thing at a time, and to usthings seem linear. This is produced within fourth dimension to which we call time. Thefourth dimension is like a blanket on consciousness forcing it into structure and coherency, bringing matter to a more solid state of viewing. A lot of people when they become aware of forth dimension they experience this level of space as being seen as the astral world, or structural worlds. They are when seen through the mind as being darker than our world in perception, almost like walking in the night. Things are accentuated in this area of space of fourth dimensional reality. What ever is concentrated on is visualized as greater than the restof what is seen around it. People come into this world when they go into dreams and oftenthey interact with other worlds within these areas of space to which they are not at allaccustomed to in their material third dimensional world that they see in the physical.Fourth dimension becomes the veil on life making us think that there is nothing more than physical existence itself and that we are only body and not at all linked into the core of creation and the mind. Time and thought still has structure in these worlds and mostimportantly it is a place where we are able to communicate with other forms of life internally.I know for some what I have just been writing about might not at all make sense when itcomes to viewing reality as they now see it. It might all seem quite complex and mystical.But really it is fundamental and in the coming years people will become more and more awareof other worlds to which they are a part of all of the time through consciousness. They haveknown about these worlds for centuries, various people who see themselves as visionaries,who understand some of the components of the mind and physical existence from their ownstandpoint in reality, have been exploring levels of consciousness and the reasons for whythey exist. A lot do not essentially understand the reason behind some of their visions and bizarre thoughts and reasoning, but it is the core fundamental concepts that become importantto consider. These concepts become to be called psychic visions, psychological reasoning andsomething that totally steps outside of outward material constructive reality. It is the corecomponents of information that are bought back that help us to reason and define the space towhich we exist, not the way in which the information is presented. Information then getsinterpreted as mystical and supernatural when in all reality it is fundamental and normal, only
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...